10-16-2015, 01:39 PM
I've seen Dalton play this well before, just not for this long. Still waiting for the playoffs. I'll take this though, its fun, but I'm still guarded.
(10-16-2015, 12:39 PM)Johnny Cupcakes Wrote: [ -> ]You can't have your cake and eat it too...(I don't really understand that saying)
If you're going to say that he "was never a bottom 10 guy", then don't say that he's a "top 5 guy" now. He's certainly performing like one, and that's exactly what I'd call it, but if we can't call last year for what it was, then why would we do so for these last 5 games.
(10-16-2015, 10:41 AM)WhoDeyWho Wrote: [ -> ]Less "genius" and more a Johnny come lately.
(10-16-2015, 01:41 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: [ -> ]This. Just because a guy finally admits something that is blatantly obvious, doesn't mean he's not still an idiot.
(10-16-2015, 01:32 PM)WhoDeyWho Wrote: [ -> ]If Dalton was as "average" as people said he was, why did it only take him playing great in 5 games to move him into the top 10 of active QBs in terms of QB rating for his career?
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/pass_rating_active.htm
Why would there even be a discussion about replacing a guy like that?
(10-16-2015, 01:59 PM)MrRager Wrote: [ -> ]Because if you go year by year a 87.3 passer rating is average.
2014 he was 25th
2013 (the big year every talks about) he was 15th
2012 he was 13th
2011 he was 20th
Does that seem average to you?
(10-16-2015, 01:41 PM)WhoDeyWho Wrote: [ -> ]There are 32 starting QBs in the league. I've never thought Dalton was in the bottom half of them.
(10-16-2015, 02:05 PM)Johnny Cupcakes Wrote: [ -> ]You should probably take a gander at his 2014 season if you didn't happen to catch it. Definitely a "bottom 10" performance.
(10-16-2015, 02:10 PM)WhoDeyWho Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not judging my view of Dalton on one season.
(10-16-2015, 01:59 PM)MrRager Wrote: [ -> ]Because if you go year by year a 87.3 passer rating is average.
2014 he was 25th
2013 (the big year every talks about) he was 15th
2012 he was 13th
2011 he was 20th
Does that seem average to you?
(10-16-2015, 01:59 PM)MrRager Wrote: [ -> ]Because if you go year by year a 87.3 passer rating is average.
2014 he was 25th
2013 (the big year every talks about) he was 15th
2012 he was 13th
2011 he was 20th
Does that seem average to you?
(10-16-2015, 02:05 PM)Johnny Cupcakes Wrote: [ -> ]You should probably take a gander at his 2014 season if you didn't happen to catch it. Definitely a "bottom 10" performance.
(10-16-2015, 02:16 PM)Brownshoe Wrote: [ -> ]Seems pretty good considering the weapons he has had.
2011 - excuses
2012 - excuses
2013 - excuses
2014 - excuses
2015 - Dalton is looking great! I attribute all of the team's success to one guy even though if the other guys weren't there, we'd be left with more excuses.
(10-16-2015, 02:19 PM)XenoMorph Wrote: [ -> ]had his best compeition % dispite not having anyone to throw too..
(10-16-2015, 02:21 PM)Johnny Cupcakes Wrote: [ -> ]Cool. A completion percentage is great and all, but when you still end up with the 25th ranked passer rating, 19 TDs and 17 INTs, you've had what sane people call a "bottom 10 guy year".
(10-16-2015, 02:05 PM)Johnny Cupcakes Wrote: [ -> ]You should probably take a gander at his 2014 season if you didn't happen to catch it. Definitely a "bottom 10" performance.
(10-16-2015, 02:22 PM)Brownshoe Wrote: [ -> ]Unless you look at the reason why he had that kind of performance, but you just want to ignore the facts.
(10-16-2015, 02:16 PM)Johnny Cupcakes Wrote: [ -> ]I don't think anyone has done this. You just made this conversation pointless.
(10-16-2015, 02:22 PM)Brownshoe Wrote: [ -> ]Unless you look at the reason why he had that kind of performance, but you just want to ignore the facts.