01-03-2016, 02:42 AM
(01-03-2016, 02:24 AM)bfine32 Wrote: [ -> ]Player B seems like a better player from the given stats.
Player B has 12 more games to get the slightly better stats.
(01-03-2016, 02:24 AM)bfine32 Wrote: [ -> ]Player B seems like a better player from the given stats.
(01-03-2016, 02:42 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: [ -> ]Player B has 12 more games to get the slightly better stats....or you could say Player B has done it in one less season in the NFL.
(01-03-2016, 01:40 AM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: [ -> ](Wait, are wins only a Dalton statistic?)
(01-03-2016, 01:54 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: [ -> ]If you could have the optimal QB and be guaranteed the health of the QB and WR for the entire season, what order would you take these receivers?
A.J. Green
Julio Jones
Antonio Brown
(01-03-2016, 09:01 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: [ -> ]Actually... yes. The only people who get records attached to them are HC, QB, and sometimes Owners (but generally only if they're really good or really bad). Pretty established fact.
Go do a search for "Andy Dalton win loss record" and your first result should be profootballreference where on the advanced passing stats it'll show you his record of 50-26-1.
Now do a search for "Jeremy Hill win loss record" and the first thing that should show will be a Wikipedia page for "Jeremy Hill (baseball)".
(01-03-2016, 08:56 PM)bfine32 Wrote: [ -> ]....or you could say Player B has done it in one less season in the NFL.
But why would anybody do that?
(01-03-2016, 09:17 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: [ -> ]No, you actually couldn't. One more, maybe, but certainly not one less. They were in the same draft, 2 picks apart.
(01-03-2016, 09:07 PM)Johnny Cupcakes Wrote: [ -> ]It's unfortunate that in a game in which 90 players can play in any given game, 2 of them get credited with the outcome. It's such an insanely silly idea.