I wouldn't mind the Bengals looking into Alonzo. He's 29, likely still got some tread on the tires, so to speak. His contract is significant, but not outrageous.
Alonso is pretty good.
The question becomes, IF we only play 2 LB's most of the time...does he replace Brown or Vigil?
(08-30-2019, 11:47 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: [ -> ]Alonso is pretty good.
The question becomes, IF we only play 2 LB's most of the time...does he replace Brown or Vigil?
Or... With a trio of athletes like Pratt, Brown, and Alonzo, they can just cover the underneath in base..
(08-30-2019, 11:47 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: [ -> ]Alonso is pretty good.
The question becomes, IF we only play 2 LB's most of the time...does he replace Brown or Vigil?
Or... With a trio of athletes like Pratt, Brown, and Alonzo, they can just cover the underneath in base..
He's not good in coverage that's his biggest issue.
(08-31-2019, 01:35 AM)Jakeypoo Wrote: [ -> ]He's not good in coverage that's his biggest issue.
He's also a bit of a dirty player.
(08-31-2019, 02:29 PM)hollodero Wrote: [ -> ]He's also a bit of a dirty player.
He's a good player, but there are legitimate character concerns from what I understand.