09-20-2019, 11:22 PM
I've thought that he was going to be out longer than that since the injury first happened. Just basing it off of Eiferts injury, which was basically the same injury Green has.
(09-20-2019, 12:54 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: [ -> ]He's 31 now. I doubt he's still in his prime at 34/34.
He doesn't rely on speed though so that part should age well. But he does rely on jumping which will go sooner rather than later.
I'd say Randy Moss is a good comparison and age 32 was his last 1000 yard year. Then he fell off a cliff at age 33. No absolutes though. Jerry Rice put up 1000 yards at age 40.
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Taylor: Still no update on WR AJ Green ‘’he will not play this weekend’’ #SeizeTheDEY #Bengals @Local12
— Chris Renkel (@Chris_Renkel) September 23, 2019
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Zac Taylor said A.J. Green will not play against Pittsburgh Monday Night and doesn’t expect him to practice this week. Taylor did say Green is turning in the right direction and progressing. #Bengals
— Marisa Contipelli (@BengalsMarisa) September 23, 2019
(09-23-2019, 04:49 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: [ -> ]Zac Taylor said A.J. Green will not play against Pittsburgh Monday Night and doesn’t expect him to practice this week. Taylor did say Green is turning in the right direction and progressing. #Bengals
— Marisa Contipelli (@BengalsMarisa) September 23, 2019
(09-23-2019, 04:54 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: [ -> ]This is why I said they just needed to IR the guy before the season started. He's not even going to practice this week. That means even if he practices next week, he likely won't play since he won't be up to speed/condition. That's likely 5 weeks missed.
I would much rather have had him just miss the extra time and come back Week 10 after the Week 9 bye at 100% in both health and conditioning.
8 weeks of 100% AJ is better than 10-11 weeks of 75% AJ (with a greater chance of him getting reinjured).
(09-23-2019, 04:54 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: [ -> ]This is why I said they just needed to IR the guy before the season started. He's not even going to practice this week. That means even if he practices next week, he likely won't play since he won't be up to speed/condition. That's likely 5 weeks missed.
I would much rather have had him just miss the extra time and come back Week 10 after the Week 9 bye at 100% in both health and conditioning.
8 weeks of 100% AJ is better than 10-11 weeks of 75% AJ (with a greater chance of him getting reinjured).
(PS Pistons, when embedding a Tweet, you can remove the <script> bits at the end and it won't look all janky.)
(09-23-2019, 04:56 PM)KillerGoose Wrote: [ -> ]Agreed, especially with how the season is going. Just keep the man healthy. Him coming back is going to save the season, an IR would have been fine. AT this point, I would imagine they make sure he is 100% and okay before putting him out there. No point in rushing him back.
(09-23-2019, 04:59 PM)bfine32 Wrote: [ -> ]There is a possibility the player is the one fighting this; as it is a contract year.
(09-23-2019, 04:59 PM)bfine32 Wrote: [ -> ]There is a possibility the player is the one fighting this; as it is a contract year.
(09-23-2019, 04:59 PM)bfine32 Wrote: [ -> ]There is a possibility the player is the one fighting this; as it is a contract year.
(09-23-2019, 06:01 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: [ -> ]Fighting what?
(09-23-2019, 06:04 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: [ -> ]Keeping him out longer.
(09-23-2019, 06:07 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: [ -> ]Meaning the team is trying to keep him out longer than necessary?
(09-23-2019, 04:54 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: [ -> ]This is why I said they just needed to IR the guy before the season started. He's not even going to practice this week. That means even if he practices next week, he likely won't play since he won't be up to speed/condition. That's likely 5 weeks missed.
I would much rather have had him just miss the extra time and come back Week 10 after the Week 9 bye at 100% in both health and conditioning.
8 weeks of 100% AJ is better than 10-11 weeks of 75% AJ (with a greater chance of him getting reinjured).
(PS Pistons, when embedding a Tweet, you can remove the <script> bits at the end and it won't look all janky.)
(09-23-2019, 06:09 PM)psychdoctor Wrote: [ -> ]I think you are correct. The Bengals could have kept someone else on the 53 until he came back. However, I think Jonah Williams feels he can make it back and if I am not mistaken, the team can only bring one player back after 8 weeks. Not sure though.
A.J. Green just jogged by me and told me I should write about it, so there’s that. #Bengals
— Tyler Dragon (@TheTylerDragon) September 28, 2019
(09-23-2019, 06:01 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: [ -> ]Fighting what?
(09-23-2019, 09:56 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: [ -> ]Dennard is on Reserve. Assuming he's who they bring back.
Jonah won't be able to come back. No way will he have strength enough to play.
(09-23-2019, 06:01 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: [ -> ]Fighting what?
(09-20-2019, 11:22 PM)Brownshoe Wrote: [ -> ]I've thought that he was going to be out longer than that since the injury first happened. Just basing it off of Eiferts injury, which was basically the same injury Green has.