10-04-2015, 02:22 AM
(10-04-2015, 02:13 AM)Ricky Spanish Wrote: [ -> ]As a huge Dalton "doubter" I can honestly say that I have seen a huge difference in the quality of his game.
Dalton has improved in many aspects of his game so far.
![[Image: bb52bc2bdace37200c4014ce4ab25a32.jpg]](https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/bb/52/bc/bb52bc2bdace37200c4014ce4ab25a32.jpg)
(10-04-2015, 02:13 AM)Ricky Spanish Wrote: [ -> ]As a huge Dalton "doubter" I can honestly say that I have seen a huge difference in the quality of his game.
Dalton has improved in many aspects of his game so far.
(10-03-2015, 12:58 PM)GreenCornBengal Wrote: [ -> ]So far, no high balls.
Throwing the ball high was his worst issue if you ask me.
He corrected that, and the rest comes with it.
Keep it up Andy.
(10-04-2015, 01:25 AM)Utts Wrote: [ -> ]How is an injury cover up more plausible than him losing confidence, and WHY WHY WHY would they let him play in the Pro Bowl if he were injured? Rubbish.
(10-03-2015, 10:02 PM)jowczarski Wrote: [ -> ]Hm.
I don't know if they were "in his ear" too much. The thing I've heard the most re: on field play is that a bad stretch, or bad plays, would linger - and perhaps lead to more issues. They point to some incompletions in the red zone vs. SD that led to a field goal. In the past, perhaps he forces the issue. Instead, an incompletion is a win. Then you look at combination of the Eifert non-TD / sack-fumble / INT - never lost confidence, never let it continue on. Now, this isn't saying he's not going to have a bad game or games or the Bengals won't lose games. But they feel they've seen the foundation of what could prevent the 2.0 performance, or the stretch of 3-4 games. That's kind of the point of this though - we don't really know what will happen - but that something is "different."