01-03-2023, 03:45 PM
(01-03-2023, 03:37 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: [ -> ]If they just skip the game, I will be angry. Don't get that at all, this game is huge in Playoff implications.
At the end of the day, the show must go on.
(01-03-2023, 03:37 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: [ -> ]If they just skip the game, I will be angry. Don't get that at all, this game is huge in Playoff implications.
(01-03-2023, 03:45 PM)bengaloo Wrote: [ -> ]At the end of the day, the show must go on.
(01-03-2023, 03:36 PM)Mickeypoo Wrote: [ -> ]Oh I completely agree and if the game were reversed I wouldn't want the win. That would feel icky.
You could reference the Colts/Vikings game also.
I honestly think my OCD mind can process someone getting a win and someone getting a loss much easier than a tie or a no contest. Even it it means an *. It keeps everything "normal" and I am a creature of regiment and habit. lol.
(01-03-2023, 03:39 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: [ -> ]Nah, couldn't call it either way but you definitely don't call it a tie and you definitely don't just skip the game entirely like it
looks like they are going to do. This is bogus if that is what they are doing, this was the biggest game of the season so far.
(01-03-2023, 03:47 PM)Vas Deferens Wrote: [ -> ]Sounds like they are going to kick the can down the road and see what happens after the outcome of Sunday's games.
(01-03-2023, 03:50 PM)TheCincinnatiKid Wrote: [ -> ]They may have to if they can't fit it in. I think we're all aligned in preferring the game is replayed, but I think calling it a Bengals win would be more ridiculous than writing the game off, if it can't be replayed. The 7-3 lead in a game like this one, was not close to meaningful in determining a result.
I personally think you move the playoffs to allow for this game to be played. Nothing's ideal here though.
(01-03-2023, 03:33 PM)KillerGoose Wrote: [ -> ]NFL announces that the Bills-Bengals game will not be resumed this week. No further updates as of now, no changes to Week 18 schedule as of now.
— Dan Graziano (@DanGrazianoESPN) January 3, 2023
(01-03-2023, 03:45 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: [ -> ]Yeah, but you don't just skip the show lol
(01-03-2023, 03:53 PM)leonardfan40 Wrote: [ -> ]Saying it won’t be played this week while giving us no other info leads me to believe they are hoping the week 18 games resolve the seeding issues on their own and then they could call week 17 a tie or forfeit or no contest without it really meaning anything. Hoping they get lucky and get let off the hook from having to make an unpopular decision.
On one hand, I get it. On the other hand it probably won’t work out that way and it’s a sad tactic vs just making a plan and announcing it.
I guess if they did announce it now they’d probably be bashed for being insensitive though so maybe it’s just a PR delay.
(01-03-2023, 03:53 PM)leonardfan40 Wrote: [ -> ]Saying it won’t be played this week while giving us no other info leads me to believe they are hoping the week 18 games resolve the seeding issues on their own and then they could call week 17 a tie or forfeit or no contest without it really meaning anything. Hoping they get lucky and get let off the hook from having to make an unpopular decision.
On one hand, I get it. On the other hand it probably won’t work out that way and it’s a sad tactic vs just making a plan and announcing it.
I guess if they did announce it now they’d probably be bashed for being insensitive though so maybe it’s just a PR delay.
(01-03-2023, 03:51 PM)Bengalbug Wrote: [ -> ]So do you think we need to beat the ravens to win the AFCN?
If we beat the ravens, we can’t claim the number one seed.
This is really kind of crazy… (obviously)
I felt like they would make a decision on this (even rescheduling it after week 18) before moving on to week 18.
They can’t just leave this game in la la land.
(01-03-2023, 03:52 PM)Bengalbug Wrote: [ -> ]I’d prefer to play the game. But they need to make a decision one way or the other. If we are locked in as the 3 seed (which would happen if the game was cancelled), let’s rest our starters this week. If we still have a chance at the one or two seed, we play to win the game. If we are playing to win the AFCN… that is another scenario.
(01-03-2023, 03:53 PM)leonardfan40 Wrote: [ -> ]Saying it won’t be played this week while giving us no other info leads me to believe they are hoping the week 18 games resolve the seeding issues on their own and then they could call week 17 a tie or forfeit or no contest without it really meaning anything. Hoping they get lucky and get let off the hook from having to make an unpopular decision.
On one hand, I get it. On the other hand it probably won’t work out that way and it’s a sad tactic vs just making a plan and announcing it.
I guess if they did announce it now they’d probably be bashed for being insensitive though so maybe it’s just a PR delay.
(01-03-2023, 03:50 PM)TheCincinnatiKid Wrote: [ -> ]They may have to if they can't fit it in. I think we're all aligned in preferring the game is replayed, but I think calling it a Bengals win would be more ridiculous than writing the game off, if it can't be replayed. The 7-3 lead in a game like this one, was not close to meaningful in determining a result.
I personally think you move the playoffs to allow for this game to be played. Nothing's ideal here though.
(01-03-2023, 04:02 PM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: [ -> ]This decision feels like a cop out and also is more harmful than just determining a result. Basically, the Ravens now have to consider "will this game ever be played? If not, then we can't win the division, so we may as well rest Jackson for the playoffs." But if they do that, and then the Bengals are later told that they'll play the Bills in "week 19" and the playoffs are pushed back a week, imagine how the Ravens would feel if the Bengals end up losing.
The NFL is intentionally not making the hard decision and are instead doing nothing and just hoping no one has a problem with it. That rarely works out.
Anyone who's ever worked for a bad manager is familiar with this situation.
(01-03-2023, 03:50 PM)TheCincinnatiKid Wrote: [ -> ]They may have to if they can't fit it in. I think we're all aligned in preferring the game is replayed, but I think calling it a Bengals win would be more ridiculous than writing the game off, if it can't be replayed. The 7-3 lead in a game like this one, was not close to meaningful in determining a result.
I personally think you move the playoffs to allow for this game to be played. Nothing's ideal here though.