Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise - Another postseason of buttcheek offense?

(01-16-2023, 01:05 PM)packerbacker Wrote: [ -> ]You guys think Jacksonville can upset KC next week?

No.

(01-16-2023, 01:41 PM)packerbacker Wrote: [ -> ]I think you guys could beat anyone especially KC but I want to see a better performance than last night. It could be cause it was a division game why it was so tough for you guys last night. The same for Buffalo yesterday.

3 oline injuries is a major concern. Major.

(01-16-2023, 08:49 AM)Rubekahn29 Wrote: [ -> ]All true, but also massive drops by his receivers for huge gains. Waddle had at least 3 that would have been 20+ on each. Nevertheless, I get your point.

That's a good point, also the QB missed Hill on several routes that would have huge.

(01-16-2023, 02:07 PM)packerbacker Wrote: [ -> ]Hey Wyche! Congratulations last night buddy!

Thanks man!

The Bengals just overcame the best defense in the NFL.This Ravens team came into this game with a very good game plan,and executed it well.
The Bengals survived.Moving forward,I think this game is going to make the Bengals even better.They were tested on both sides of the ball,and still found a way to win.That’s what championship teams do.

(01-16-2023, 02:20 PM)casear2727 Wrote: [ -> ]That's a good point, also the QB missed Hill on several routes that would have huge.

If the Bengals were going in with a healthy o-line, I'd be extremely confident about this game. If the Bills can't generate pressure, they are in big trouble. Burrow isn't going to miss all the throws that Thompson did yesterday.

(01-16-2023, 02:34 PM)samhain Wrote: [ -> ]If the Bengals were going in with a healthy o-line, I'd be extremely confident about this game. If the Bills can't generate pressure, they are in big trouble. Burrow isn't going to miss all the throws that Thompson did yesterday.

A healthy oline, we are probably favorites and should be. This oline may once again restrict the playbook like last year except no one will give us the go routes this season. It will be tough.

(01-16-2023, 04:14 PM)casear2727 Wrote: [ -> ]A healthy oline, we are probably favorites and should be. This oline may once again restrict the playbook like last year except no one will give us the go routes this season. It will be tough.

Nah. It probably would have still been the standard 3 point favorite for the home team. So basically a draw. Think it’s only at 3.5 right now though.

How fast I made it through the offensive film for the Bengals just hammered home how very little drives they actually got.

They had 5 possessions in the first 3 quarters of the game and scored 17, one fumble, one punt.
— Goodberry (@JoeGoodberry) January 16, 2023

This will be one heck of a game.

(01-16-2023, 12:59 PM)sandwedge Wrote: [ -> ]Why wasnt then sack on Burrow called a horse collar?

I think it is incredibly stupid, but it is legal when a QB is in the pocket.

(01-16-2023, 01:12 PM)samhain Wrote: [ -> ]I might be more nervous about the Jags defense than KC's or Buffalo's.

I will take the Jags every day of the week and twice on Sunday over KC or Buffalo, though.

(01-17-2023, 10:05 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: [ -> ]I think it is incredibly stupid, but it is legal when a QB is in the pocket.

I would guess that's because when the QB is in the pocket, he isn't running, so a horse collar is not as dangerous.

I am ecstatic we won!!!

It's also true that we can be critical of the offense at the same time. They are not mutually exclusive.

It was 24-17 in the 4th with a chance to put the game away and then the last 2 offensive possessions were:

Punt - 6 play for 13 yards (15 yards of that on a roughing the kicker so in reality it was -2 yards), 2:40 time
Punt - 3 plays for -1 yards, 1:20 time

After going up 24-17, we had 2 possessions to ice away the game with either points or at least time and proceeded to go 9 plays for -3 yards. This doesn't count the possession prior when they went 3 plays for 8 yards, 1:19 time.

How exactly is pointing this out "complaining"?

(01-16-2023, 01:57 AM)Nately120 Wrote: [ -> ]Not to knock Burrow and ZT, but this does remind me of the bad ol' days when their predecessors had to face two elite defenses 4+ times per year in the division alone.

ML ~~owned,~~ um rented the Ravens. Wink

(01-16-2023, 01:58 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: [ -> ]Come on man! Get on the complain train!!! The Bengals didn't win a playoff game in 31 years and now they've won 4 out of the last 5.

Complaints, complaints! choooo choooooooooooooooooooo

lulz

[Image: FmpGW3_XEAExIX6?format=jpg&name=medium]

(01-16-2023, 02:38 AM)THE PISTONS Wrote: [ -> ]The Dolphins backup qb scored 31 points against them.

There are no teams the Bengals don't have a shot against. The Bills have the same question marks.

c/att yds TD Int
Skylar 18/45 220 1 2

Whatever

(01-16-2023, 04:10 AM)samhain Wrote: [ -> ]Baltimore was the toughest defense the Bengals will face until they potentially meet SF in the Super Bowl.

If they go into Buffalo and don't drop 30 on the Bills, I'll be more concerned. The secondary up there should be a relatively easy mark for Burrow and the fellas.

Nope.

https://www.covers.com/sport/football/nfl/statistics/team-defense/2022-2023

NFL Team Defense
4. [Image: nyj.png]

6.

8.

9.

16.

(01-17-2023, 01:39 PM)BengalYankee Wrote: [ -> ]Nope.

https://www.covers.com/sport/football/nfl/statistics/team-defense/2022-2023

NFL Team Defense
4.

6.
8.

9.

16.

that's not taking the Roquan Smith transaction into play.

We're 16th? Jeez I thought we were top 10 on defense.

Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise

THE PISTONS

THE PISTONS

casear2727

Wyche'sWarrior

ezekiel23

samhain

casear2727

Nicomo Cosca

Nicomo Cosca

packerbacker

SHRacerX

SHRacerX

Sled21

BleedNOrange

BengalYankee

BengalYankee

BengalYankee

BengalYankee

Frank Booth

Big Boss