09-25-2023, 01:11 PM
(09-25-2023, 01:10 PM)pally Wrote: [ -> ]I still would not be surprised to see Sinnett activated from the PS to act as the emergency QB
Wouldn't we need to cut somebody to do so? Who would it be?
(09-25-2023, 01:10 PM)pally Wrote: [ -> ]I still would not be surprised to see Sinnett activated from the PS to act as the emergency QB
(09-25-2023, 12:24 PM)Clark W Griswold Wrote: [ -> ]I now believe that if he says he can play then play him.
They are 0-2 so sitting him = season over. If he re-injures it and has to miss multiple games it won’t matter because you get the same result (wait ‘til next year)
Only reason to sit him would be if this could cause a more serious injury. If not then play him for as long as you can.
Either way I’m not feeling like this is their year regardless of what happens tonight.
(09-25-2023, 12:29 PM)PhilHos Wrote: [ -> ]Are you kidding me, Clark? This only cements my feeling that we're winning the Super Bowl this year. You can't make up this kind of drama. If you have a movie start out the way we've started out, no way are people buying that same team wins the Super Bowl. Just relax, Joe's gonna continue to play, he'll probably have a setback (the mid-way point of the movie, naturally) and things will look even more dire (direr?), but then just like Bobby Boucher in the Bourbon bowl, Burrow will just dominate at the end culminating in him hoisting up the Lombardi.
WHO FRICKIN' DEY!
(09-25-2023, 12:12 PM)WeezyBengal Wrote: [ -> ]Update from this morning:
[url= url]
(09-25-2023, 12:18 PM)WeezyBengal Wrote: [ -> ]My question is this...
If he continues tweaking his calf every other week...does it set back the actual time it takes for him to get to 100%?
I know that may be a dumb question, but I don't know the answer to it and I feel like it's a pretty important question. If the calf takes the same amount of time to get to 100% tweaking or no tweaking, then I'd say continue to play him.
(09-25-2023, 12:23 PM)KillerGoose Wrote: [ -> ]As far as I know, the recommendation for calf strains is RICE - Rest, Ice, Compress, and Elevate. Without extended rest, it is possible it may not get back to 100%. One of the bigger concerns is that a calf injury can maybe lead to a worse injury, such as a torn Achilles. I was discussing this with my physical therapist last week. The Bengals training staff is going to know all of this. If Burrow continues playing, this injury could linger all season. How big of a deal that is, we aren't sure. If he plays tonight, we will have a little more information to answer that question with.
From The Insiders on #NFLPlus: All three of us are in agreement, with optimism that #Bengals QB Joe Burrow somehow plays tonight... pic.twitter.com/DAbG9afWdd
— Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) September 25, 2023
(09-25-2023, 01:11 PM)PhilHos Wrote: [ -> ]Wouldn't we need to cut somebody to do so? Who would it be?
(09-25-2023, 02:07 PM)Nepa Wrote: [ -> ]"During the NFL's spring meetings [2023], owners approved a rule change to allow a third quarterback to dress on game days, which won't count toward the team's active roster limit. That means teams may not have to burn an active roster spot on a third quarterback on gamedays, which may help alleviate some other roster construction problems for the league."
https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/news/nfl-emergency-qb-rule-3rd-quarterback-2023/pcbxurweiswxq4o1ns2ubbqh
Quote:
- Teams who are carrying two quarterbacks on their active roster on game day may carry a third, emergency quarterback (from the 53-man roster) who does not count against the team's game day roster;
(09-25-2023, 12:15 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: [ -> ]I feel like Burrow campaigning with coaching staff and trainers to play before he was ready is why we are in this situation in the first place, 0-2, him having played like dogshit, and then reinjuring himself.
(09-25-2023, 12:29 PM)PhilHos Wrote: [ -> ]Are you kidding me, Clark? This only cements my feeling that we're winning the Super Bowl this year. You can't make up this kind of drama. If you have a movie start out the way we've started out, no way are people buying that same team wins the Super Bowl. Just relax, Joe's gonna continue to play, he'll probably have a setback (the mid-way point of the movie, naturally) and things will look even more dire (direr?), but then just like Bobby Boucher in the Bourbon bowl, Burrow will just dominate at the end culminating in him hoisting up the Lombardi.
WHO FRICKIN' DEY!
(09-25-2023, 12:51 PM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: [ -> ]2020
And regardless of how mid Volson is, MJ was worse.
(09-25-2023, 02:12 PM)PhilHos Wrote: [ -> ]They dont' have to make him active on GameDays, but he still needs to be on the 53 man roster, though.
From the article you posted:
(09-25-2023, 02:13 PM)Wyche Wrote: [ -> ]Probably so.....and in all likelihood was what the golf cart ride with Mikey was about. I feel like it was a "we're protecting you from yourself" conversation.
(09-25-2023, 02:22 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: [ -> ]It is also on the coaches not preparing for a banged up Burrow. Should of had the Playbook expanded and went to more of a run first
Offense with quick Slants, Screen passes and alike where Burrow just gets the ball out fast out of the pocket without having to run
himself. Mixon and the run game haven't been the problem this season which is wild why we haven't ran the ball more than we have.
Of course Burrow is going to want to play no matter what. I would be more concerned if he was happy to just rest up honestly.
(09-25-2023, 02:31 PM)Wyche Wrote: [ -> ]I agree with the part about Mixon and the run game, but go back and watch that Cleveland game if you can stomach it. There were SEVERAL open slants and routes across the middle that were open that Joe didn't even attempt for some reason or another.
(09-25-2023, 12:18 PM)WeezyBengal Wrote: [ -> ]My question is this...
If he continues tweaking his calf every other week...does it set back the actual time it takes for him to get to 100%?
I know that may be a dumb question, but I don't know the answer to it and I feel like it's a pretty important question. If the calf takes the same amount of time to get to 100% tweaking or no tweaking, then I'd say continue to play him.
(09-25-2023, 02:36 PM)TheFan Wrote: [ -> ]From what the doctors on some podcasts have shared, yes. But we'll never know if he's at 100% even if he sits 3 weeks. I think the bigger concern is that it could lead to an achilles injury.
(09-25-2023, 02:31 PM)Wyche Wrote: [ -> ]I agree with the part about Mixon and the run game, but go back and watch that Cleveland game if you can stomach it. There were SEVERAL open slants and routes across the middle that were open that Joe didn't even attempt for some reason or another.
(09-25-2023, 02:39 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: [ -> ]He likely wouldn't be. He rested a month during camp and still re-injured it.
(09-25-2023, 02:33 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: [ -> ]Zac will just run about 24 0-5 yard passes to protect him.
(09-25-2023, 02:49 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: [ -> ]Not going to go back and watch that game as I cannot stomach it, but yeah, Burrow wasn't right mentally or physically in that game.
He missed about 3 possible TD passes and like you said several open Slants across the middle.
He will find his nitch here soon, hopefully it is tonight where we desperately need to get a win and get our Offense turned around.
Even with Burrow's injury we could be 2-0 if he played like his normal self passing the ball out of the pocket.
We started to see it in the 2nd half vs the Rats. We will see, it will be really telling tonight if he is on or not.
(09-25-2023, 04:21 PM)Wyche Wrote: [ -> ]Absolutely. Even with the int in the second half against Baltimore, it looked like it finally clicked for Joe. It's gotta be rough getting up to game speed after weeks of being pretty much idle. This offense is built around and for Joey B, if he's struggling, it's going to struggle. Still should've ran more before it got to the point we had to throw. That's definitely on on the staff.