(09-28-2023, 10:32 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: [ -> ]A 40yd net on punts is absolutely atrocious.
His net is only 38.9 so far. From last year's stats that would make him 4th worst, just ahead of Kevin Huber. So they drafted a replacement with the same net.
Mark my words: this isn't the last you will hear from Chuck Sizzle this year.
He's got at least another touchdown in him, folks. You can bank on it! How many weeks?, is the question.
Soon as we get a reliable guy who can get yards out of nothing he gets hurt
Life in the NFL SMH
Is it too much to ask, with Charlie Jones back on PR and WR, that the red-hot Bengals, really start to sizzle?
I mean, that's what we really want. We, the fans, we really want it - to sizzle. It's best when it's either sizzling, or has been sizzled, is what I can confidently report. as a hardcore fan.
Bengals just got to get Chuck some touches is all I'm saying. Chuck up a flea flicker...
That would make it sizzle loud and proud. So make it happen, Taylor, ya figgin bum!
This Tanner Hudson roster addition means I'll have to wait at least a week to get my Charlie Jones fix. Disappointing, but there's always college highlights. It's always sizzling on Youtube.
I see the Bengals logic here. TE was the priority.
(11-01-2023, 05:22 PM)Doin the Shuffle Wrote: [ -> ]This Tanner Hudson roster addition means I'll have to wait at least a week to get my Charlie Jones fix. Disappointing, but there's always college highlights. It's always sizzling on Youtube.
I see the Bengals logic here. TE was the priority.
I guess Chuck is a week away with the thumb, so not too long to wait for your Chuck Sizzle fix lol
As good as TI has been, Chuck can be electric as we saw on the Ravens Punt Return TD.
I'm curious as to who's going to get waived when we activate Jones.
(11-01-2023, 05:22 PM)Doin the Shuffle Wrote: [ -> ]This Tanner Hudson roster addition means I'll have to wait at least a week to get my Charlie Jones fix. Disappointing, but there's always college highlights. It's always sizzling on Youtube.
I see the Bengals logic here. TE was the priority.
I agree w you.
Was so disappointed w that injury and timing. I loved him @ PR, but was really hoping to see him get some snaps and progress in the offense as well. I was a pretty big fan of his value in this year’s draft even before we selected him.
(11-02-2023, 01:01 AM)Bengal Dude Wrote: [ -> ]I'm curious as to who's going to get waived when we activate Jones.
I'd like to throw Irv Smith Jrs name into that pot....
(11-02-2023, 09:20 AM)Sled21 Wrote: [ -> ]I'd like to throw Irv Smith Jrs name into that pot....
Definitely not happening.
Devin Harper is my guess.
(11-02-2023, 01:01 AM)Bengal Dude Wrote: [ -> ]I'm curious as to who's going to get waived when we activate Jones.
Part of me feels (hopes?) they are promoting Hudson to give some more competition and pressure on the TE group.
Whoever performs worst out of Hudson, Smith, Wilcox, and Sample gets the boot when Jones returns.
(11-02-2023, 01:01 AM)Bengal Dude Wrote: [ -> ]I'm curious as to who's going to get waived when we activate Jones.
If I had to guess, I would say Devin Harper considering they signed Clay Johnston to the PS.
(11-02-2023, 09:41 AM)ochocincos Wrote: [ -> ]Part of me feels (hopes?) they are promoting Hudson to give some more competition and pressure on the TE group.
Whoever performs worst out of Hudson, Smith, Wilcox, and Sample gets the boot when Jones returns.
I’d bet that Irv Smith is going to get some chances to keep his spot as the starter. It’s coming to a head.
(11-02-2023, 09:40 AM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: [ -> ]Definitely not happening.
Devin Harper is my guess.
I wouldn't be shocked if it is Irv.
He doesn't provide any value on special teams and if Tanner Hudson is going to be the "pass catching" tight end on this team (he was just called up), then what is Irv's roll on this team exactly?
(11-02-2023, 10:28 AM)WeezyBengal Wrote: [ -> ]I wouldn't be shocked if it is Irv.
He doesn't provide any value on special teams and if Tanner Hudson is going to be the "pass catching" tight end on this team (he was just called up), then what is Irv's roll on this team exactly?
I wouldn't be either, but I don't think it'll be him.
Wilcox is gone before him, IMO.
(11-02-2023, 09:55 AM)Soonerpeace Wrote: [ -> ]I’d bet that Irv Smith is going to get some chances to keep his spot as the starter. It’s coming to a head.
Oh I'm sure he'll get chances, I just don't think he'll do very well.
(11-02-2023, 09:40 AM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: [ -> ]Definitely not happening.
Devin Harper is my guess.
I don't think so either, he would just be my pick. I just don't see where he adds any value. Both Hudson and Wilcox have shown me more. I am severely disappointed in Irv. That said, I think Burrow has had enough of him too. Notice in the Oz the mentalist clip, he threw the ball to Tanner and not to Irv. And in his interview where they asked him about Hudson being elevated, Burrow mentioned he was a reliable pass catcher. Then he mentioned they have to "do a better job of taking care of the football." None of that looks good for Irv
(11-02-2023, 09:40 AM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: [ -> ]Definitely not happening.
Devin Harper is my guess.
Doubtful on Harper the Bengals have currently only 2 LBers on the roster next season if they release him.
(11-02-2023, 09:20 AM)Sled21 Wrote: [ -> ]I'd like to throw Irv Smith Jrs name into that pot....
Just throw him anywhere, but on the field.
(11-02-2023, 11:19 AM)ochocincos Wrote: [ -> ]Oh I'm sure he'll get chances, I just don't think he'll do very well.
No idea.