04-23-2024, 02:13 PM
(04-23-2024, 01:40 PM)Sled21 Wrote: [ -> ]
they should 100% use this one. It has the modern white tiger feel while paying homage to the originals.
(04-23-2024, 01:40 PM)Sled21 Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-23-2024, 02:13 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: [ -> ]they should 100% use this one. It has the modern white tiger feel while paying homage to the originals.
(04-23-2024, 03:14 PM)Clark W Griswold Wrote: [ -> ]I guess this is what makes these discussions interesting with all of the different opinions because I think that helmet is the definition of generic.
This makes the original helmets even worse. Not sure they could do worse than plain white with the Bengals across the side.
Compare it to the inverted stripes and tell me what looks better/cooler/will get fans more excited.
(04-22-2024, 09:28 PM)Clark W Griswold Wrote: [ -> ]That top pic of Burrow should give everyone nightmares. Cover up the Bengals on the side of the helmet and it’s a picture of him as the Browns QB
Black with orange stripes is the way to go. Bengals are now known for the stripes/best helmets so the next great helmet is the inverted one.
Also, most of the truly great players listed who wore the original Browns style helmet had their finest hour with the stripes on their heads (Bengals 1st SB appearance)
(04-23-2024, 11:14 AM)The Clapp Wrote: [ -> ]Do you get it? Obviously not. Paul Brown took the Browns uniforms as a FU to THAT team.. hence the same colors.. He changed the helmet design radically, to distance the team from Cleveland. What sense does it make to have a throw back uniform (not just helmet) that would basically honor the Browns?
Edit: I have nothing against using the orange helmet with Bengals on the side as long as you can show me a tiger in the wild with Bengals written across the side of it.. I mean if we are going by the logic that there is no such thing as a black tiger with orange stripes. All joking aside.. i dont mind the orange helmet..its the damn uniforms i dont want..
(04-23-2024, 03:18 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: [ -> ]I dont like the inverted tiger stripes, personally
A new look in Houston ?#HTownMade pic.twitter.com/3dnAUl60YX
— Houston Texans (@HoustonTexans) April 23, 2024
An ode to the past with a focus on the future.
— Denver Broncos (@Broncos) April 22, 2024
This is the Mile High Collection. pic.twitter.com/U4dY9jL1iZ
(04-23-2024, 08:35 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: [ -> ]texans uniforms look horrid.
(04-24-2024, 03:40 PM)Big Boss Wrote: [ -> ]How about this?That tiger is tweaked alright... Looks like it's been up for 3 days and running off to the scrap yard with some stolen copper.
-1970s uniforms
-White helmet w/ a tweaked version of this logo on the sides:
I'd do a mockup if I had any sort of photoshop skills lol.
(04-23-2024, 08:56 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: [ -> ]Says the guy that loves those Jr high looking white Bengals helmets.
(04-24-2024, 04:46 PM)jason Wrote: [ -> ]That tiger is tweaked alright... Looks like it's been up for 3 days and running off to the scrap yard with some stolen copper.
(04-12-2024, 03:02 PM)jason Wrote: [ -> ]Google "1970s Bengals uniforms" and check out the pics of Burrow and Ja'Marr in them that'll pop up. They look pretty slick, and it'd be a nice homage to Riley, Anderson, Curtis, Parish, and the guys that played most of their careers in them.
(04-24-2024, 07:30 PM)Hammerstripes Wrote: [ -> ]Riley, Anderson, Curtis, Parish played in stripes didn't they? It's not just a no on the first helmets, it's a HELL NO. Worst helmet I've seen.
(04-25-2024, 08:52 AM)Sled21 Wrote: [ -> ]Anderson was there for the transition to stripes. Not sure Riley, Curtis or Parrish were.
(04-25-2024, 11:05 AM)Hammerstripes Wrote: [ -> ]I'm pretty sure Riley played in the first Super Bowl. Not sure about the others.
I get the sentiment and it's always interesting to see the different "eras" of fans and their preferences.
(04-25-2024, 12:13 PM)sandwedge Wrote: [ -> ]Just checked, Parrish was the only one in that group who wasn't on the roster for our 1st SB
(05-05-2024, 08:30 PM)Sled21 Wrote: [ -> ]Munoz and Kenny Anderson are all in on the throwbacks. It's only a matter or time... https://fanrecap.com/bengals-legends-excited-over-possible-retro-uniform-comeback/?utm_source=cincinnati-begnals&utm_medium=nfl-facebook-comment&utm_campaign=nfl-mk&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR143sZzb3wJ15DjMB-eGk5oG8gkAW5d4V4zJyIADZbrbxm46hNHpkc4G9Y_aem_AT7T8J6zfl9rQ0YxNJwcaEBfS3ZBo5Ddz9noIaETRju6cfw70Q4ICI2y_u6EbYkLw8aYCSZvdlo4Iw7hhxpoHDeX
(05-05-2024, 10:02 PM)Clark W Griswold Wrote: [ -> ]I love Munoz but they didnt pick his choice for a 1st round OT in the draft when they could have and they shouldn’t pick his choice for a third helmet either. The original, Brownies rip-offs are plain, boring and, worst of all, look like Cleveland’s horrible helmets.
The Bengals striped helmets are the signature logo of the franchise. The white stripes are awesome and there is still 1 more awesome look left to complete the striped helmet trilogy. Black with orange stripes is the way to go.
If they ever allow a 4th helmet then they can bring those ugly-ass “Cincinnati Browns” helmets back for a preseason game or something ?
(05-06-2024, 08:52 AM)jason Wrote: [ -> ]I think an alternate helmet is lower on the priority list than a first round pick. So of course Munoz won't be consulted for the pick. The same way they're not gonna ring of honor style ask the fans who they should draft either.
Heads are literally gonna explode around here should they choose the throwbacks (they will), and wear them against Cleveland.