12-20-2015, 10:16 PM
(12-20-2015, 10:15 PM)BritishBengal Wrote: [ -> ]Does that mean strength of victory? If so that would be a horrible way to lose the North, yikes.
Yes.
(12-20-2015, 10:15 PM)BritishBengal Wrote: [ -> ]Does that mean strength of victory? If so that would be a horrible way to lose the North, yikes.
(12-20-2015, 10:09 PM)bengalsfan182 Wrote: [ -> ]Playoff machine says we have... someone coreect me if im wrong please
(12-20-2015, 10:12 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: [ -> ]Because both teams have the potential to be 1-1 head to head, 4-2 in the division and 8-4 in the conference and Pittsburgh would have the better SOV%.
(12-20-2015, 10:22 PM)jfkbengals Wrote: [ -> ]Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think they are getting it on the strength of schedule. They have the first place schedule, and no one can predict what the strength of victory will be for the final two games, but I can say that our net points are much more than theirs, so I would surmise that we have a greater strength of victory.
(12-20-2015, 10:05 PM)barkerja Wrote: [ -> ]Not sure if today is a good benchmark for really taking a deep look at AJ. He showed some bright moments: a couple long balls that were on point and made no "rookie mistakes" (aka turnovers).
The OL was terrible, both in pass protection and the run game. Thankfully our D showed up and gave the offense plenty of opportunities. If the OL corrects itself going into MNF, we're going to have a fun game on our hands.
(12-20-2015, 10:06 PM)PApinhead Wrote: [ -> ]I don't know, did you see the Bronco's last couple of series? Osweiler looked like crap. Terrible decisions and terrible throws. If we can get some pressure on him, we should be alright.
(12-20-2015, 10:30 PM)Whacked Wrote: [ -> ]Agreed BUT currently, as of "today"....who would you prefer to have in the playoffs as your QB?
No brainer for me. Brock.
(12-20-2015, 10:22 PM)jfkbengals Wrote: [ -> ]Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think they are getting it on the strength of schedule. They have the first place schedule, and no one can predict what the strength of victory will be for the final two games, but I can say that our net points are much more than theirs, so I would surmise that we have a greater strength of victory.
(12-20-2015, 10:25 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: [ -> ]SOS and SOV, Pitt has a higher percentage. I've not looked at tie breakers to see which it is, but it wouldn't matter either way. Too much of a headache. Just win damn football games.
(12-20-2015, 10:28 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: [ -> ]Freaking headaches...
1. Head to Head
2. Division
3. Common games
4. Conference
5. Strength of Victory
6. Strength of Schedule
(12-20-2015, 10:25 PM)Big Boss Wrote: [ -> ]Eh. I wouldn't sleep on Baltimore just yet. A divisional game is a divisional game.
(12-20-2015, 10:35 PM)Awful Llama Wrote: [ -> ]It will be their Super Bowl, and an opportunity (provided we'd lost eariler to Denver) to rob us of the division. Yeah, Harbaugh will have them up for that and we'll get their best shot. Whether that will be enough is debatable.
(12-20-2015, 10:30 PM)Whacked Wrote: [ -> ]Agreed BUT currently, as of "today"....who would you prefer to have in the playoffs as your QB?
No brainer for me. Brock.
(12-20-2015, 10:02 PM)Whacked Wrote: [ -> ]???
Denver played AT CRAPSburgh, put up 27 points, and lost in the final seconds.
We got humiliated at home against DICKSburgh.
Let's keep it real - Osweiler > AJ big time. AJ looks like a back up. Osweiler does not.
(12-20-2015, 10:35 PM)Awful Llama Wrote: [ -> ]It will be their Super Bowl, and an opportunity (provided we'd lost eariler to Denver) to rob us of the division. Yeah, Harbaugh will have them up for that and we'll get their best shot. Whether that will be enough is debatable.