(07-25-2025, 01:29 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: [ -> ]Did I miss we made Fant a contract offer or you just attempting to bash the FO on a myth?
I'm making a prediction that the Bengals FO doesn't offer him the contract/dollars he wants.
(07-25-2025, 01:35 PM)TecmoBengals Wrote: [ -> ]I'm making a prediction that the Bengals FO doesn't offer him the contract/dollars he wants.
I say if no contract is no contract is offered, they did not think he could help this team. Why jump to Bengals are a problem unless you have an agenda?
(07-25-2025, 10:09 AM)Sled21 Wrote: [ -> ]I realize All is not healthy...
I think that Zac really liked what he saw from the offense during that stretch of games that All was able to play. The offense definitely had a different vibe to it when they were able to effectively run 12 personnel. The passing game didn't lose anything and rushing attack actually had some teeth to it.
(07-25-2025, 01:29 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: [ -> ]Did I miss we made Fant a contract offer or you just attempting to bash the FO on a myth?
It's not a myth. Why do you refuse to see the truth?
(07-25-2025, 01:43 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: [ -> ]It's not a myth. Why do you refuse to see the truth?
He needs some of those They Live sunglasses.
(07-25-2025, 01:41 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: [ -> ]I say if no contract is no contract is offered, they did not think he could help this team. Why jump to Bengals are a problem unless you have an agenda?
Agreed, they might not offer a contract under the premise they do not value him enough to help the team.
You have a strange thought process about my post.
My post (a simple sentence): Bengals might not pay him what he wants.
You: What's your agenda you teller of myths?!?!
Your post: Bengals might not offer him a contract.
Your own thoughts about your similarly constructed, simple sentence: Who the **** knows?
You said, "unless I have an agenda..."
![[Image: laugh-jack-nicholson.gif]](https://media1.tenor.com/m/-m_qukJ-VwYAAAAC/laugh-jack-nicholson.gif)
Bengals most probably discussed a one year deal with him - similar to Hurst and Gesicki's first contract.
Since Bengals can walk away next year from Gesicki's contract, it makes sense to test out Fant this year and make a decision next year on which to keep.
With All hopefully back next year, Bengals won't need both Gesicki and Fant.
(07-25-2025, 01:29 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: [ -> ]Did I miss we made Fant a contract offer or you just attempting to bash the FO on a myth?
(07-25-2025, 01:43 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: [ -> ]It's not a myth. Why do you refuse to see the truth?
There's a room right over there -->>>>
Go there and get it over with and stop bringing this shyt into every friggin thread.
(07-25-2025, 01:43 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: [ -> ]I think that Zac really liked what he saw from the offense during that stretch of games that All was able to play. The offense definitely had a different vibe to it when they were able to effectively run 12 personnel. The passing game didn't lose anything and rushing attack actually had some teeth to it.
Actually 3.7ypc with ALlL eith snap count, he made some nice blocks but did not alter our running game from when he was not in. Right now he is a after thought to Bengals thinking I would sau
(07-25-2025, 01:43 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: [ -> ]It's not a myth. Why do you refuse to see the truth?
It is a myth. How do you know with 100% certainty Fant (not others) was offered a contract and it was not more than another team offered?
By all means, prove Fant was offere a deal, otherwise it is a myth.
(07-25-2025, 02:00 PM)TecmoBengals Wrote: [ -> ]Agreed, they might not offer a contract under the premise they do not value him enough to help the team.
You have a strange thought process about my post.
My post (a simple sentence): Bengals might not pay him what he wants.
You: What's your agenda you teller of myths?!?!
Your post: Bengals might not offer him a contract.
Your own thoughts about your similarly constructed, simple sentence: Who the **** knows?
You said, "unless I have an agenda..."
I read between the line, your agenda is to to post proganda to attack the FO. Stick to actual facts and I have no issue.
You were the one who jumped to a conclusion Bengals were the issue and would be out bid, out bid on what? No contract was offferd, yet you felt they need to thow it out like it was a fact versus an opinion.
It’s like you’re their attorney.
(07-25-2025, 02:16 PM)Stewy Wrote: [ -> ]There's a room right over there -->>>>
Go there and get it over with and stop bringing this shyt into every friggin thread.
Be my guest to leave.
I will never back down from pointing out lies.
Have a great day and weekend
(07-25-2025, 02:36 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: [ -> ]It is a myth. How do you know with 100% certainty Fant (not others) was offered a contract and it was not more than another team offered?
By all means, prove Fant was offere a deal, otherwise it is a myth.
I'd say if they liked him, they probably offered him a deal and he's checking to see if he can get a better one elsewhere. Just like buying a car.
(07-25-2025, 02:53 PM)Sled21 Wrote: [ -> ]
I'd say if they liked him, they probably offered him a deal and he's checking to see if he can get a better one elsewhere. Just like buying a car.
They may have liked him, but if they loved him he would be a Bengal.
Again, I have seen nothing saying we offered him anything making such speculation a myth.
(07-25-2025, 02:16 PM)Stewy Wrote: [ -> ]There's a room right over there -->>>>
Go there and get it over with and stop bringing this shyt into every friggin thread.
You already posted this. Mind your ***** business or ignore it. Your choice.
(07-25-2025, 02:41 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: [ -> ]Be my guest to leave.
I will never back down from pointing out lies.
Have a great day and weekend
You didn't point out any lies. You ignore the truth and make up your own.
(07-25-2025, 02:57 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: [ -> ]They may have liked him, but if they loved him he would be a Bengal.
Again, I have seen nothing saying we offered him anything making such speculation a myth.
Well, that's kind of what I meant. If they loved him, they wouldn't have let him leave the building. If they liked him, they may have said "here's your offer, we like you this much," and go see if someone else likes you more because this is our offer. If not, call us and the offer is still on the table. Or maybe they didn't make an offer, who knows.
(07-25-2025, 03:01 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: [ -> ]You didn't point out any lies. You ignore the truth and make up your own.
I stand by my posts Fant was not offered a contract. I have seen nothing stating we offered Fant anything. I have seen he had a nice visit and will stay in touch.
So, the truth is saying otherwise is a myth (lie). I know you want the FO tarred and feathered, but it is disappointing you perpetuate propaganda to do it.