(01-10-2016, 01:05 AM)jfkbengals Wrote: [ -> ]I am.
I've never celebrated an injury in my life, until now.
Mitchell and others stated on Twitter that they were out to hurt guys prior to the first game, and succeded with a cheap shot to Eifert.
They went after Eifert's head again, and then that shit from Shazier.
I'm a Buckeye fan, and I can promise you he didn't make those plays there. He was taught that in Pittsburgh.
I'm delighted Ben's injured, and I'll celebrate even more if it ends his career. **** THOSE DIRTY ASS BITCHES!!!!
At least you're at peace with you're scummy nature. Congrats.
LOL!!!!! They're spending more time trying to figure out whether or not Burficts was legal than they did Bernards. So sad........
AJM finally learned how to check down to the RB
Looks lile the announcer lost someone of his family ...
(01-10-2016, 01:06 AM)Shake n Blake Wrote: [ -> ]If it were any player other than Burfict, they wouldn't be talking about it.
It wouldn't have been as bad if they we're so adamant about the hit on Bernard being clean.
"Was Burfict's hit legal?"
We're moving but a bit too slow.
Hill better get his ass out there
So far we've lost Nelson, Kirkpatrick, and Bernard. Have I missed anyone?
(01-10-2016, 01:07 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: [ -> ]Why do they keep asking if it was a legal tackle? It was the most legal tackle in this entire game, both sides.
Because they have to try to create controversy.
(01-10-2016, 01:07 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: [ -> ]Why do they keep asking if it was a legal tackle? It was the most legal tackle in this entire game, both sides.
Yep. You didn't hear them keep asking about the hit on Gio.
Eiferrrrrrrrrrrrrrrt. need to catch that man...ahh
(01-10-2016, 01:08 AM)PApinhead Wrote: [ -> ]Yep. You didn't hear them keep asking about the hit on Gio.
They did, actually.
I think they were distracted by Burfict and Hill going full prison mode on the field.
damn high ball.