03-09-2016, 06:18 PM
03-09-2016, 06:19 PM
(03-09-2016, 06:18 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: [ -> ]So much for that. Not that it was realistic.
Doesn't mean we didn't try right? Bears have lots of money to spend, I'm sure they paid Trevathan a hefty amount.
03-09-2016, 06:20 PM
Wonder if the Barron deal made him a crap ton richer.
03-09-2016, 06:20 PM
(03-09-2016, 06:20 PM)Stormborn Wrote: [ -> ]Wonder if the Barron deal made him a crap ton richer.
It better have.
03-09-2016, 06:23 PM
(03-09-2016, 06:20 PM)RoyleRedlegs Wrote: [ -> ]It better have.
The list of the nice things we just can't have increases daily.
03-09-2016, 06:33 PM
(03-09-2016, 06:23 PM)Stormborn Wrote: [ -> ]The list of the nice things we just can't have increases daily.
At potentially 9+ per year I don't want it
03-09-2016, 06:42 PM
(03-09-2016, 06:33 PM)RoyleRedlegs Wrote: [ -> ]At potentially 9+ per year I don't want it
Yikes. Teams are overpaying more than usual this year.
03-09-2016, 06:43 PM
(03-09-2016, 06:42 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: [ -> ]Yikes. Teams are overpaying more than usual this year.
Im just going off of Barron's carwreck of a deal. Trevathan is so much better.
03-09-2016, 06:47 PM
(03-09-2016, 06:43 PM)RoyleRedlegs Wrote: [ -> ]Im just going off of Barron's carwreck of a deal. Trevathan is so much better.
The converted safety that was a bust for the Bucs?
I wasn't aware that he was doing that well in St Louis.
03-09-2016, 06:48 PM
(03-09-2016, 06:47 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: [ -> ]The converted safety that was a bust for the Bucs?
I wasn't aware that he was doing that well in St Louis.
as far as I know he wasn't. Good not great.