What exactly goes into the "top poster" rankings? As it stands right now, the top 3 posters on this entire board are StLucieBengal, fredtoast and a Steelers fans. "Most" posts and "top" posts don't mean the same thing.
Seriously though, it's a nice update.
Meh, you know the rule. They obviously go with quantity over quality. So, I guess that makes you a loser, either way.
(03-20-2016, 03:30 PM)6andcounting Wrote: [ -> ]What exactly goes into the "top poster" rankings? As it stands right now, the top 3 posters on this entire board are StLucieBengal, fredtoast and a Steelers fans. "Most" posts and "top" posts don't mean the same thing.
Seriously though, it's a nice update.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media.giphy.com/media/xFtnEUno0bvS8/giphy.gif)
(03-20-2016, 06:29 PM)GMDino Wrote: [ -> ]
Just you wait, I'll get the recognition I deserve and you will still just be "that Steelers fan on a bengals board".
(03-20-2016, 06:56 PM)6andcounting Wrote: [ -> ]Just you wait, I'll get the recognition I deserve and you will still just be "that Steelers fan on a bengals board".
Jokes on you! That's all I ever wanted to be.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media.giphy.com/media/Z4la7mxhim0Le/giphy.gif)
We need a forum award show. settle this once and for good.
(03-20-2016, 10:39 PM)RoyleRedlegs Wrote: [ -> ]We need a forum award show. settle this once and for good.
I second the motion.
Sounds like fun.
To pad their post count, some people routinely don't hit the multi-quote tab, but just rather post a few separate posts with a different post quoted.
It's a flawed system in those instances, but I guess the post count matters to some people.
(03-21-2016, 03:09 AM)BFritz21 Wrote: [ -> ]To pad their post count, some people routinely don't hit the multi-quote tab, but just rather post a few separate posts with a different post quoted.
Well sometimes you need to differentiate from poster to poster how you will respond to them.
(03-21-2016, 03:09 AM)BFritz21 Wrote: [ -> ]It's a flawed system in those instances, but I guess the post count matters to some people.
I agree. Some people take it too seriously.
(03-20-2016, 11:35 PM)Rotobeast Wrote: [ -> ]I second the motion.
Sounds like fun.
Thirded
I wanna see a total list of rankings.
A rep per post avg would be a cool stat.
Why's this in Smack Talk anyways? Sup Smack Talk people.
(03-21-2016, 06:44 AM)GMDino Wrote: [ -> ]Well sometimes you need to differentiate from poster to poster how you will respond to them.
That's why it separates them in the reply.
(03-21-2016, 11:00 AM)CageTheBengal Wrote: [ -> ]I wanna see a total list of rankings.
A rep per post avg would be a cool stat.
Why's this in Smack Talk anyways? Sup Smack Talk people.
I feel this would be the closest metric.
Board stats lol.
I wasn't aware we needed to metric for anything related to this board. It's just peeps talking.
(03-21-2016, 02:33 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: [ -> ]Board stats lol.
I wasn't aware we needed to metric for anything related to this board. It's just peeps talking.
And yet there is rep...a metric...that you fully utilize.
(03-21-2016, 02:45 PM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: [ -> ]And yet there is rep...a metric...that you fully utilize.
How many times banned/suspended and whether it's from the whole board is just a specific forum should be a metric. The winner gets a 3 days suspension as a prize.
(03-21-2016, 02:45 PM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: [ -> ]And yet there is rep...a metric...that you fully utilize.
Ofc I rep people. It's fun. Exactly what the board should be.....
(03-21-2016, 07:39 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: [ -> ]What I do like when they suspend you they actually tell you why. Which is nice because I can screen shot all the ridiculous reasons. Here is a nice sample.
You're gonna' get in trouble for this, too.
