04-01-2016, 07:13 PM
(04-01-2016, 06:16 PM)Beaker Wrote: [ -> ]Repeat that to yourself over and over as you try to get to sleep after watching the Bengals manhandle your team with a backup QB.
I agree.
(04-01-2016, 06:16 PM)Beaker Wrote: [ -> ]Repeat that to yourself over and over as you try to get to sleep after watching the Bengals manhandle your team with a backup QB.
(04-01-2016, 06:16 PM)Beaker Wrote: [ -> ]Repeat that to yourself over and over as you try to get to sleep after watching the Bengals manhandle your team.
(04-01-2016, 07:13 PM)TRsome Wrote: [ -> ]I agree.
(04-01-2016, 07:20 PM)StrictlyBiz Wrote: [ -> ]They were losing 15-0 after 3 quarters and only came back after the Steelers put in their back up QB. Hardly "manhandling"
(04-01-2016, 11:55 PM)Beaker Wrote: [ -> ]Except for the fact that your team didnt put in your back up....the Bengals took out your starter. Manhandled.
(04-01-2016, 11:55 PM)Beaker Wrote: [ -> ]Except for the fact that your team didnt put in your back up....the Bengals took out your starter. Manhandled.
(04-02-2016, 01:47 PM)6andcounting Wrote: [ -> ]The Steelers had the lead and all the back-up had to do was not lose the game. He blew that.
Then he had a chance to redeem himself just by getting the offense in field goal range. He blew that even worse.
Ben returned, playing at about 25%, and single-handed won the game. Manhandled.
(04-02-2016, 02:32 PM)BigPapaKain Wrote: [ -> ]If by won the game you mean sailed a pass and got his best reciever killed in the process than sure.
(04-02-2016, 01:47 PM)6andcounting Wrote: [ -> ]The Steelers had the lead and all the back-up had to do was not lose the game. He blew that.
(04-01-2016, 12:28 PM)Griever Wrote: [ -> ]yeah they really need to stop playing down to their competition when it comes to bad teams
(04-02-2016, 06:09 PM)Beaker Wrote: [ -> ]Nope. Your defense gave up the points....to our backup QB. And you played the next game without your #1 rb, #1 WR and #1 Qb gimpy, all due to the Bengals manhandling them.
(04-02-2016, 02:41 PM)6andcounting Wrote: [ -> ]Won - as in something the Bengals haven't done in the playoffs.
(04-02-2016, 07:39 PM)StrictlyBiz Wrote: [ -> ]Urban legend has it that they did win a few playoff games a long time ago. Not sure whether it's true or not since it's been a so many generations since it supposedly happened.
(04-02-2016, 02:41 PM)6andcounting Wrote: [ -> ]Won - as in something the Bengals haven't done in the playoffs.
(04-02-2016, 06:41 PM)6andcounting Wrote: [ -> ]Sounds like a moral victory the Bengals claimed in their offseason to me.
(04-02-2016, 10:30 PM)Beaker Wrote: [ -> ]Nothing moral about the Bengals physically battering your steelers.But did you win?
(04-03-2016, 08:53 AM)6andcounting Wrote: [ -> ]But did you win?
(04-03-2016, 03:13 PM)Beaker Wrote: [ -> ]Nobody won that game.
[attachment=190 Wrote: 6andcounting pid='200748' dateline='1459639973']
That and the folklore about the origins of the noodles in cincinnatti spaghetti are my two favorite southwestern Ohio myths.
(04-03-2016, 05:14 PM)StrictlyBiz Wrote: [ -> ]![]()
I could've sworn the Steelers scored more points that game and then played the next week in Denver.