I believe their response was that it opens up teams to having any decal on their helmet or logo on their uniform that is not NFL related, something that could eventually cause issues.
Someone correct me if I am wrong, but usually it is limited to teams honoring people within the NFL community (dead owners or players, etc).
Yes but they allowed Beyoncé to push her BLM agenda and they allowed players on the Rams to walk out with their hands up...
(08-12-2016, 06:11 PM)Trademark Wrote: [ -> ]Yes but they allowed Beyoncé to push her BLM agenda and they allowed players on the Rams to walk out with their hands up...
Very different things and characterizing this as things they "allowed" is dishonest. The first is a halftime performance. The second was something players chose to do in the heat of the moment, not something the NFL approves ahead of time.
(08-16-2016, 07:17 PM)fredtoast Wrote: [ -> ]WTF?

One of her newer songs made references to police brutality and this
![[Image: 30328462.sf.jpg]](http://thumbnail.newsinc.com/30328462.sf.jpg)
It wasn't a big deal for most people
(08-12-2016, 05:46 PM)Trademark Wrote: [ -> ]Of course, all the NFL cares about is money, Goodell is selfish
(08-12-2016, 06:11 PM)Trademark Wrote: [ -> ]Yes but they allowed Beyoncé to push her BLM agenda and they allowed players on the Rams to walk out with their hands up...
So how exactly did Goodell make more money from the BLM agenda and letting players raise their hands than he would from allowing a decal to honor fallen police?
Seems that you are not really concerned about the financial aspects at all. Gee, I wonder what you are really upset about?

(08-16-2016, 10:09 PM)fredtoast Wrote: [ -> ]That was an homage to the Black Power movement of the 60's, not BLM. And she never mentioned police violence during the halftime as far as I could tell.
It's all the same for some people.