Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise

Blatant holding on Hunt

That was holding versus hunt but either way need to contain him

Holding

Saw 2 blatant no holding calls there. Pathetic

(09-18-2016, 02:26 PM)jj22 Wrote: [ -> ]Dennard looking slow

Hard to cover anyone for that long. Not sure how no holding is being called right in front of the refs face. 

Refs supposed to be awake today

Instead of trying to make excuses like holding face the fact that the secondary coverage was comically bad. No receiver should ever be that open especially on third down.

We're already playing the refs.

Easy to "be Ben" when your line is allowed to hold.

(09-18-2016, 02:27 PM)TSwigZ Wrote: [ -> ]That was holding versus hunt but either way need to contain him

Can't wait for him to get ahold of Ben.  

(09-18-2016, 02:28 PM)masonbengals fan Wrote: [ -> ]Refs supposed to be awake today

as it pertains to fighting.....not the typical Stoolers love calls!!

(09-18-2016, 02:26 PM)jfkbengals Wrote: [ -> ]The dline was running in place for christs sake.  How is there not a flag????????????

The Steelers have to rip their jerseys all the way off for it to be holding. 

(09-18-2016, 02:28 PM)Joelist Wrote: [ -> ]Instead of trying to make excuses like holding face the fact that the secondary coverage was comically bad. No receiver should ever be that open especially on third down.

There was holding hipster

I guess the refs thought Margus was just trying to tackle with one arm.

did he have control the whole way down? Isnt that the rule going into the end zone?

Well...great.

Since when is an arm across the front of the defender not holding

Of Course.....Ben picking us apart !!

Too easy.

And....easy TD.

So much for the defense playing good. Our only hope now is the offense suddenly decides to play football.