Would love to know what it is.
Will bet it's less than .500
The more time we have to plan, the more guaranteed we are to lose. Lol
More proof: Ever notice when the next play looks like a bust; OR is just a very important one in the game - we wisely take a time out - then FAIL. Lol
I blame this on he coaches.
Preparation and motivation for critical moments I put more on the coaches than anything.
This includes games after bye weeks, 4th quarter decisions, prime time games, and playoff games. Mah-vin Lewis.
I'm only going as far back as 2011, cause there's no point going back any further since that was before the core of our team now.
2011: W
2012: L
2013: W
2014: L (This was the infamous "We're on to Cincinnati" L to the Pats)
2015: W
(10-03-2016, 08:30 PM)mikehayman Wrote: [ -> ]I'm only going as far back as 2011, cause there's no point going back any further since that was before the core of our team now.
2011: W
2012: L
2013: W
2014: L (This was the infamous "We're on to Cincinnati" L to the Pats)
2015: W
With the current coach, sure there is!
2003 - 2010 record after the bye...
2 wins
5 losses
1 tie
(10-03-2016, 08:24 PM)reuben.ahmed Wrote: [ -> ]Preparation and motivation for critical moments I put more on the coaches than anything.
This includes games after bye weeks, 4th quarter decisions, prime time games, and playoff games. Mah-vin Lewis.
Amen brother
(10-03-2016, 08:32 PM)PDub80 Wrote: [ -> ]With the current coach, sure there is!
2003 - 2010 record after the bye...
2 wins
5 losses
1 tie
Thank you for finding that
I rest my case.
Play the game. You can't rewrite the past but the future is up to them. Stats can keep you in the cellar if you let them, and that's where you die.
(10-03-2016, 08:30 PM)mikehayman Wrote: [ -> ]I'm only going as far back as 2011, cause there's no point going back any further since that was before the core of our team now.
2011: W
2012: L
2013: W
2014: L (This was the infamous "We're on to Cincinnati" L to the Pats)
2015: W
Three wins to two losses is encouraging, but that pattern does not bode well for our chances this season, though.
(10-03-2016, 08:48 PM)Whacked Wrote: [ -> ]Thank you for finding that
I rest my case.
Overall, 8-17-1
4-2 against the Steelers after a bye.
(10-03-2016, 08:17 PM)Whacked Wrote: [ -> ]Would love to know what it is.
Will bet it's less than .500
The more time we have to plan, the more guaranteed we are to lose. Lol
I blame this on he coaches.
Toldya.
(10-09-2016, 09:10 PM)Whacked Wrote: [ -> ]Toldya.
Just imagine how ugly it could have been today without those extra three days to prepare.
(10-03-2016, 08:30 PM)mikehayman Wrote: [ -> ]I'm only going as far back as 2011, cause there's no point going back any further since that was before the core of our team now.
2011: W
2012: L
2013: W
2014: L (This was the infamous "We're on to Cincinnati" L to the Pats)
2015: W
Oh, so to keep our mediocrity going we're scheduled to lose.
(10-09-2016, 09:10 PM)Whacked Wrote: [ -> ]Toldya.
This wasn't the game after the bye week.
How do you know the Bengals are guaranteed to lay an egg next game? Hobson starts talking about the infamous "self scouting" that always ends up with us changing our scheme and playing terribly for a couple of games until they revert to what was working.