Refs to the rescue. Expected nothing less.
Not a coincidence Roger Godell was in the stands to watch his favorite team get a little assist from the crooked refs for the W.
Makes me sick to my stomach and kills my love for the NFL just a little more.
Leveon Bell had 170 rushing yards on a 5.7 ypc average. Damn refs.
(01-16-2017, 01:19 AM)6andcounting Wrote: [ -> ]Too bad for Kansas City choke holding isn't a legal form of blocking. So sad.
Depends what team you play for. If you're in black and gold it's obviously legal
(01-16-2017, 01:29 AM)6andcounting Wrote: [ -> ]Leveon Bell had 170 rushing yards on a 5.7 ypc average. Damn refs.
You're not aware that it's easier to gain yards when your linemen hold on every play?
Hmm. I'd wager that even a legitimate mental midget knew that. I wonder why you weren't aware?
(01-16-2017, 01:34 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: [ -> ]You're not aware that it's easier to gain yards when your linemen hold on every play?
Hmm. I'd wager that even a legitimate mental midget knew that. I wonder why you weren't aware?
![[Image: ID_Super_Salty_To_The_Rescue_by_DizziKatz.jpg]](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-2NQAkntiwzE/TW5RAkl9WbI/AAAAAAAAAQ8/G_-PCr0KqXg/s1600/ID_Super_Salty_To_The_Rescue_by_DizziKatz.jpg)
(01-16-2017, 01:38 AM)6andcounting Wrote: [ -> ]![[Image: ID_Super_Salty_To_The_Rescue_by_DizziKatz.jpg]](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-2NQAkntiwzE/TW5RAkl9WbI/AAAAAAAAAQ8/G_-PCr0KqXg/s1600/ID_Super_Salty_To_The_Rescue_by_DizziKatz.jpg)
Damn. You confirmed it that quick. Sub-average IQ.

(01-16-2017, 01:39 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: [ -> ]Damn. You confirmed it that quick. Sub-average IQ. 
Bengals. Sub-average winning percentage.
(01-16-2017, 01:28 AM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: [ -> ]Refs to the rescue. Expected nothing less.
Not a coincidence Roger Godell was in the stands to watch his favorite team get a little assist from the crooked refs for the W.
Makes me sick to my stomach and kills my love for the NFL just a little more.
Agree 100%. Quit watching the game because of it.
(01-16-2017, 01:45 AM)6andcounting Wrote: [ -> ]Bengals. Sub-average winning percentage.
Reply = Ineffective message board trolling.
Protip: Make sure your subject cares, at least a little, about your trolling attempt.
*You get 0 points--remains at N00b level*
On a side note; you're either not even trying, or you're really, really bad at this. If i were you, i'd claim "not trying" because your body of work implies the latter.
(01-16-2017, 01:54 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: [ -> ]Reply = Ineffective message board trolling.
Protip: Make sure your subject cares, at least a little, about your trolling attempt.
*You get 0 points--remains at N00b level*
On a side note; you're either not even trying, or you're really, really bad at this. If i were you, i'd claim "not trying" because your body of work implies the latter.
Steelers status = winning
rfaulk status = salty
(01-16-2017, 01:57 AM)6andcounting Wrote: [ -> ]Steelers status = winning
rfaulk status = salty
Either of the two choices given previously, this is way too boring. I will now leave you to lick windows in peace.
(01-16-2017, 01:57 AM)6andcounting Wrote: [ -> ]Steelers status = winning
rfaulk status = salty
i don't understand why rfaulk isn't a kentucky fan. he lives in kentucky......from what i can tell he's a UC OSU or Xavier fan. all good teams. just not winners. either way no one really likes the steelers in any way shape or form if you ARE a true fan of ANYTHING. Not chiefs not patriots not texans not anyone. the Pittsburgh Steelers are hated around the world.
(01-16-2017, 02:00 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: [ -> ]Either of the two choices given previously, this is way too boring. I will now leave you to lick windows in peace.
6andcounting status = tucked rfaulk into bed
Could someone inform this tyke that i'm busy replying to other threads?
I can't seem to get down to his level and make him realize how tedious he is. Thanks in advance and sorry about the headache you're about to have. I will compensate you with many rep points.
Pass rush status = held
![[Image: 16114206_902504766519664_823446069196707...e=58D64A28]](https://scontent.fagc1-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/16114206_902504766519664_823446069196707416_n.jpg?oh=be054c55d0f257f93f74f85f74607833&oe=58D64A28)
(01-16-2017, 01:13 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: [ -> ]If it was Burfict, he would have been hung at the 50 yard line immediately. Then tarred and feathered. Then drawn and quartered.
thats racist
Do any steeler fans think Davis should get a 4 game suspension for the blow to the head of a defenseless WR in a playoff game like Burfict got?
(01-16-2017, 02:38 PM)Beaker Wrote: [ -> ]Do any steeler fans think Davis should get a 4 game suspension for the blow to the head of a defenseless WR in a playoff game like Burfict got?
Absolutely not. The (double) standard is the (double) standard.
(01-16-2017, 02:38 PM)Beaker Wrote: [ -> ]Do any steeler fans think Davis should get a 4 game suspension for the blow to the head of a defenseless WR in a playoff game like Burfict got?
You think a first time offender of a "blow to the head" penalty should get a 4 game suspension, because another guy got a 3 game suspension only after 9-10 previous fines for dirty play?
EDIT:
Beaker is correct. I looked up the word "fair" in the dictionary and the definition is "whatever Beaker thinks up and spews out on his keyboard based on his feelings for various football team." I guess his post checkouts then.
I apologize, you are correct....a 3 game suspension would be fair, not 4. My bad.