What exactly goes into the "top poster" rankings? As it stands right now, the top 3 posters on this entire board are StLucieBengal, fredtoast and a Steelers fans. "Most" posts and "top" posts don't mean the same thing.


Seriously though, it's a nice update.

Meh, you know the rule. They obviously go with quantity over quality. So, I guess that makes you a loser, either way.

(03-20-2016, 03:30 PM)6andcounting Wrote: What exactly goes into the "top poster" rankings? As it stands right now, the top 3 posters on this entire board are StLucieBengal, fredtoast and a Steelers fans. "Most" posts and "top" posts don't mean the same thing.


Seriously though, it's a nice update.

(03-20-2016, 06:29 PM)GMDino Wrote:

Just you wait, I'll get the recognition I deserve and you will still just be "that Steelers fan on a bengals board".

(03-20-2016, 06:56 PM)6andcounting Wrote: Just you wait, I'll get the recognition I deserve and you will still just be "that Steelers fan on a bengals board".

Jokes on you!   That's all I ever wanted to be.  

We need a forum award show. settle this once and for good.

(03-20-2016, 10:39 PM)RoyleRedlegs Wrote: We need a forum award show. settle this once and for good.

I second the motion.
Sounds like fun.

To pad their post count, some people routinely don't hit the multi-quote tab, but just rather post a few separate posts with a different post quoted.

It's a flawed system in those instances, but I guess the post count matters to some people.

(03-21-2016, 03:09 AM)BFritz21 Wrote: To pad their post count, some people routinely don't hit the multi-quote tab, but just rather post a few separate posts with a different post quoted.

Well sometimes you need to differentiate from poster to poster how you will respond to them.

(03-21-2016, 03:09 AM)BFritz21 Wrote: It's a flawed system in those instances, but I guess the post count matters to some people.

I agree.  Some people take it too seriously.

(03-20-2016, 11:35 PM)Rotobeast Wrote: I second the motion.
Sounds like fun.

Thirded

I wanna see a total list of rankings.

A rep per post avg would be a cool stat.

Why's this in Smack Talk anyways? Sup Smack Talk people.

(03-21-2016, 06:44 AM)GMDino Wrote: Well sometimes you need to differentiate from poster to poster how you will respond to them.

That's why it separates them in the reply.

(03-21-2016, 11:00 AM)CageTheBengal Wrote: I wanna see a total list of rankings.

A rep per post avg would be a cool stat.

Why's this in Smack Talk anyways? Sup Smack Talk people.

I feel this would be the closest metric.

Board stats lol.

I wasn't aware we needed to metric for anything related to this board. It's just peeps talking.

(03-21-2016, 02:33 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Board stats lol.  

I wasn't aware we needed to metric for anything related to this board.   It's just peeps talking.

And yet there is rep...a metric...that you fully utilize.  

(03-20-2016, 06:56 PM)6andcounting Wrote: Just you wait, I'll get the recognition I deserve and you will still just be "that Steelers fan on a bengals board".

(03-20-2016, 07:26 PM)GMDino Wrote: Jokes on you!   That's all I ever wanted to be.  

I thought you two were the same person?   You're not? 

(03-21-2016, 02:45 PM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: And yet there is rep...a metric...that you fully utilize.  

How many times banned/suspended and whether it's from the whole board is just a specific forum should be a metric. The winner gets a 3 days suspension as a prize.

(03-21-2016, 02:45 PM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: And yet there is rep...a metric...that you fully utilize.  

Ofc I rep people.   It's fun.   Exactly what the board should be.....  

(03-21-2016, 07:39 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: What I do like when they suspend you they actually tell you why.   Which is nice because I can screen shot all the ridiculous reasons.   Here is a nice sample.   

You're gonna' get in trouble for this, too.