Just throwing this here...

http://www.dallascowboys.com/cheerleaders_squad_2017

(05-11-2018, 03:16 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: I'm not going to get in a back and forth on this, but I'll just say this:

If we're strict, people would complain.
If we're loose, people would complain.

We'll never please everyone.

It is healthy to allow a certain amount of dialogue between what some call the Neanderthal crowd and the Safe Space seeking micro-aggression crowd plus all that fall somewhere else on the spectrum.

Understandable to send to P&R if getting toxic but I like having it allowed to a certain degree. Decent balance.

Funny, 99.9% of those cheerleaders wouldn't give you ugly boneheads the time of day either.....

(05-11-2018, 03:27 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Just throwing this here...

http://www.dallascowboys.com/cheerleaders_squad_2017

Not as many as us, but I count 4 butterfaces.

You can see though, simply from the headshots, their makeup and photography is done MUCH more professionally.

(05-11-2018, 04:07 PM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: Not as many as us, but I count 4 butterfaces.

You can see though, simply from the headshots, their makeup and photography is done MUCH more professionally.

When I used to look at my older brother's girly magazines, I never thought about the make-up or lighting, like Truk does....

(05-11-2018, 03:22 PM)BenZoo2 Wrote: I think if you just worry about me the rest of these Neanderthals will fall in line.  Problem solved.

You’re welcome


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Oh, you're always one step away from a perma-ban. 

I'm usually one of the guys that sticks up for the girls? Best of luck to all of them, but those pics aren't very flattering, to say the least..... Frau Blucher.....(horses whiney in the background!)

(05-11-2018, 04:10 PM)sandwedge Wrote: When I used to look at my older brother's girly magazines, I never thought about the make-up or lighting, like Truk does....

I DON'T care...

(05-11-2018, 04:07 PM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: Not as many as us, but I count 4 butterfaces.

You can see though, simply from the headshots, their makeup and photography is done MUCH more professionally.

That, and Dallas is a much bigger pool of girls to draw from.....

(05-11-2018, 04:06 PM)sandwedge Wrote: Funny, 99.9% of those cheerleaders wouldn't give you ugly boneheads the time of day either.....

Each and every one of us likely think that we would land the .1%.

So you are saying there's a chance !!  

Like any of you losers could do any better.

(05-11-2018, 04:18 PM)Sled21 Wrote: That, and Dallas is a much bigger pool of girls to draw from.....

Cincy has a metro population of 2.1 million. Yeah Dallas is bigger, but any city that big is going to have plenty of hotties to pick from.

(05-11-2018, 01:47 PM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: 100% agree.

As an addendum, the former head chick or head of the dance coreography, whatever she was, was DEFNITELY someone whom the camera was not nice to: I saw her in person numerous times and in videos and she was downright sexy.

But the pictures made her look like an extreme butterface... I'll see if I can find her.

EDIT: Its Megan, who isn't on the Ben-gals anymore, after being here for a long time.

Our photographer:



Professional:



And yes, even though they look different, its the same person indeed.

http://www.bengals.com/media-lounge/videos/Meet-the-Ben-Gals-Lauren-and-Megan-K-/18a029b4-3b04-488c-b5f2-3b5e83c890bc

Reps Truck.

This pretty much says it all, terrible photographer or makeup artist or both.

Sad to do that to such a babe.

Still remember on the old board when a member said how some looked like a hot babe til he looked up
into the face and saw Charles Bronson!

 

Whoever is doing this stuff to these poor babes as Truck here would say just needs to stop. Just stop it.

Hire some professionals. This is what i am mad about, not the lack of an indoor practice facility lol

(05-11-2018, 02:36 PM)fredtoast Wrote: To me the very first post calling our cheerleaders "transgender/transsexual" was over the line.

But my opinion doesn't matter.

I suppose it could be considered "over the line" if you consider it to be a slur. Personally I see nothing wrong with being either.

FWIW, I can provide glamour shots of bfine to prove these girls would be lucky to land me, not the other way around.

(05-11-2018, 04:26 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I suppose it could be considered "over the line" if you consider it to be a slur. Personally I see nothing wrong with being either.

FWIW, I can provide glamour shots of bfine to prove these girls would be lucky to land me, not the other way around.

Please no marble bags....

(05-11-2018, 04:13 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Oh, you're always one step away from a perma-ban. 

Just like the bengals, close but no cigar!

(05-11-2018, 01:47 PM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: 100% agree.

As an addendum, the former head chick or head of the dance coreography, whatever she was, was DEFNITELY someone whom the camera was not nice to: I saw her in person numerous times and in videos and she was downright sexy.

But the pictures made her look like an extreme butterface... I'll see if I can find her.

EDIT: Its Megan, who isn't on the Ben-gals anymore, after being here for a long time.

Our photographer:



Professional:



And yes, even though they look different, its the same person indeed.

http://www.bengals.com/media-lounge/videos/Meet-the-Ben-Gals-Lauren-and-Megan-K-/18a029b4-3b04-488c-b5f2-3b5e83c890bc

Reminds me of that pornstars without makeup thread from the motherboard.

You can't believe anything you see on tv...

(05-11-2018, 02:39 PM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: Indeed, its night and day.

I wanted to make sure that was her for sure, as I was skeptical and THIS picture proves it:



Same bikini. And if people are STILL skeptical, this pic comes from this:

Just Unbelievable. Crazy stuff. Are they using a galaxy to take these photos lol

http://www.therams.com/photos/photo-gallery/PHOTOS-2018-Los-Angeles-Rams-Cheerleaders/9ecf637f-8a74-4baa-95dd-2de58abc2d74#start

Rams might be the gold standard.

I was always hot for the teacher.