+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html)
+--- Thread: Osweiler to start (/thread-4001.html)
Pages:
1
2
Osweiler to start - StLucieBengal - 12-23-2015
Great news.... But really it's great news with either starting. But I will take the timid BO vs our defense. Our line should eat him up.
RE: Osweiler to start - gobobro - 12-23-2015
(12-23-2015, 03:14 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Great news.... But really it's great news with either starting. But I will take the timid BO vs our defense. Our line should eat him up.
I was fine either way, to be honest. I think there isn't reason to think Brock is superior to AJM. However, I was liking the idea of Manning, rusty, in cold weather.
RE: Osweiler to start - StLucieBengal - 12-23-2015
(12-23-2015, 03:16 PM)gobobro Wrote: I was fine either way, to be honest. I think there isn't reason to think Brock is superior to AJM. However, I was liking the idea of Manning, rusty, in cold weather.
Manning won't hold the ball like BO. Even though he will throw more ducks. He will be hard to fool mentally.
RE: Osweiler to start - corpjet - 12-23-2015
I would have preferred a rusty, soft tossing Manning but hey here we go.......
RE: Osweiler to start - WeezyBengal - 12-23-2015
Brock hasn't looked like anything special so far this season. This game will be a defensive one. I think whoever wins the turnover battle wins the game.
RE: Osweiler to start - XenoMorph - 12-23-2015
(12-23-2015, 03:16 PM)gobobro Wrote: I was fine either way, to be honest. I think there isn't reason to think Brock is superior to AJM. However, I was liking the idea of Manning, rusty, in cold weather.
is there gonna be any cold weather?
RE: Osweiler to start - StLucieBengal - 12-23-2015
(12-23-2015, 03:47 PM)XenoMorph Wrote: is there gonna be any cold weather?
Dan hoard says 19 with precipitation
RE: Osweiler to start - Benton - 12-23-2015
(12-23-2015, 03:16 PM)gobobro Wrote: I was fine either way, to be honest. I think there isn't reason to think Brock is superior to AJM. However, I was liking the idea of Manning, rusty, in cold weather.
Agreed. We've done well with Manning in the past. I was looking forward to intercepting a slower, weaker version.
RE: Osweiler to start - Earendil - 12-23-2015
(12-23-2015, 03:50 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Dan hoard says 19 with precipitation
Yeah, it will definitely be a cold evening. I'm actually glad I'm not going.
RE: Osweiler to start - bengals73 - 12-23-2015
It may be the old emotional scars from the past "Big Games" but I am just not optimistic about this Game.
It's Prime Time... 1st round Bye and AFC North Crown is on the line. I think we have the players to win, just unsure about the Coaches.
RE: Osweiler to start - Nebuchadnezzar - 12-23-2015
Whoever kicks the first field goal will win the game
Nebuchadnezzar has spoken
Let it be written
Let it be so
RE: Osweiler to start - Whacked - 12-23-2015
(12-23-2015, 04:05 PM)bengals73 Wrote: It may be the old emotional scars from the past "Big Games" but I am just not optimistic about this Game.
It's Prime Time... 1st round Bye and AFC North Crown is on the line. I think we have the players to win, just unsure about the Coaches.
^x2
RE: Osweiler to start - Bengal Dude - 12-23-2015
(12-23-2015, 03:50 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Dan hoard says 19 with precipitation
Going to be a lot of handoffs in that weather. Hopefully our run game steps up.
RE: Osweiler to start - StLucieBengal - 12-23-2015
(12-23-2015, 06:13 PM)Bengal Dude Wrote: Going to be a lot of handoffs in that weather. Hopefully our run game steps up.
Ikr.... Hopefully the rear end chewing will affect these guys.
RE: Osweiler to start - BengalChris - 12-23-2015
(12-23-2015, 04:05 PM)bengals73 Wrote: It may be the old emotional scars from the past "Big Games" but I am just not optimistic about this Game.
It's Prime Time... 1st round Bye and AFC North Crown is on the line. I think we have the players to win, just unsure about the Coaches.
I understand that.
We are 1-2 so far this year in prime time. The rest of the time we are 9-1.
Maybe McCarron can be enough to change this.
RE: Osweiler to start - Whacked - 12-23-2015
I would have LOVED for PM to be the QB. This blows
RE: Osweiler to start - BURROWorBUST - 12-23-2015
I'm more concerned with Denver's running game. The way Draughn ran on us in the 49ers game, we'd better seriosuly step it up if we want to stop Hillman and CJ Anderson (if he's back).
RE: Osweiler to start - StLucieBengal - 12-23-2015
(12-23-2015, 07:33 PM)BengalChris Wrote: I understand that.
We are 1-2 so far this year in prime time. The rest of the time we are 9-1.
Maybe McCarron can be enough to change this.
We lost by 4 and by 3 on a last second FG. It's not like we laid an egg. Even the Texans game they just chucked it up and got lucky.
This Primetime narrative is bogus. It's not like in the past where they have just been blasted.
RE: Osweiler to start - BFritz21 - 12-23-2015
(12-23-2015, 06:13 PM)Bengal Dude Wrote: Going to be a lot of handoffs in that weather. Hopefully our run game steps up.
Just hope that Hill doesn't oversleep and miss another meeting because we'll need him to set the tone.
I'm happy with either QB starting because we just need to get pressure on them and force mistakes.
Osweiller looked good in the first half against the Steelers, but get him rattled and he'll fold.
We need to limit our mistakes and not set them up with short fields, so I'm hoping that we run the ball a lot.
RE: Osweiler to start - StLucieBengal - 12-23-2015
(12-23-2015, 07:47 PM)Shady Wrote: I'm more concerned with Denver's running game. The way Draughn ran on us in the 49ers game, we'd better seriosuly step it up if we want to stop Hillman and CJ Anderson (if he's back).
They can't run because their line is bad... They struggle in pass pro as well. Too many injuries.