(03-27-2018, 02:19 AM)Jakeypoo Wrote: 1.) Our defense was ranked 11th in sacks with 41 last year how is that Garbage? 
2.) 1 that stud might be the best LB in the game and 2 why doesn't Lawson count again simply because it goes against your point? By the way I am on the bandwagon for drafting a LB in the first RD. RD. Preston Brown should be a solid addition to the core.
3.) What? 
4.) Yeah our safeties are solid not sure what you are watching. Would I like to see more play making sure but there not bad at all. 
5.) If my opinion on QBs is so bad then why have 2 out of the last 3 Superbowl winners been a broken down QB and a backup QB. If my opinion on QBs is so bad then can you answer me why does Eli Manning have the same amount of Titles as Peyton Manning? Why does Terry Bradshaw have the same amount of Titles as Joe Montana? Why does Jeff Hostileter have more titles than Dan Marino?  History has shown that teams with Average QBs win Superbowls all the time not sure how you missed that?

(03-26-2018, 10:35 PM)The Real Deal Wrote: No they aren’t. I was watching nfl network earlier too and it was a hypothetical tweet sent out by an nfl network staff member about the browns trading for him using their 4th and 33rd picks. Jarvis Landry, for good reason,then  tweeted out interest in it happening. None of that in any way lends support to the browns being “about to land Odell Beckham jr.”

(03-27-2018, 09:41 AM)jj22 Wrote: Except you failed to mention the secret lunch/meeting between the two GM's at the meetings this week that was suspicious.

And the fact that the Browns are the only ones left with enough ammunition and cap space.

But sure it's all speculation. Isn't everything until it's actually done. Why so serious?

(03-27-2018, 09:41 AM)jj22 Wrote: Except you failed to mention the secret lunch/meeting between the two GM's at the meetings this week that was suspicious.

And the fact that the Browns are the only ones left with enough ammunition and cap space.

But sure it's all speculation. Isn't everything until it's actually done. Why so serious?

(03-10-2018, 09:48 AM)t3r3e3 Wrote: Missing the point.  Barkley is the best RB prospect in the last 15-20 years.  The gap between Darnold/ Rosen to Mayfield/Allen/Jackson is not that wide.  Also, Big Ben is a future HoF’er.  Obviously you take the HoF QB.  We don’t know if the rookie QB’s will be HoF’ers.

(03-28-2018, 01:47 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: He can't be the best RB prospect in the last 15-20 years, AP was drafted in 2007, and SB is no where near the RB that AP is/was.
But every year, someone is always the best at their position in the last 10-15 years. Let's ask Montee Ball, Ron Dayne, Lawrence Phillips, Trent Richardson, Blair Thomas, Ronnie Brown William Green, Kevin Jones, Beanie Wells, David Wilson (I think you get the picture now). Almost all of those RB's were "can't misses" and "best RB's in years to hit the NFL".
So forgive me if I don't buy the Barkley "Hype" for now.

(03-28-2018, 02:06 PM)McC Wrote: Barkley is so special because he never has to come off the field.  He's a three down back.  Run, catch, pass pro.  He's got it all.   It ain't hype.  It's reality.  He's the best player in the draft and that is damn near unanimous. 

Just pray along with me he does not end up in Cleveland.

(03-28-2018, 02:06 PM)McC Wrote: Barkley is so special because he never has to come off the field.  He's a three down back.  Run, catch, pass pro.  He's got it all.   It ain't hype.  It's reality.  He's the best player in the draft and that is damn near unanimous. 

Just pray along with me he does not end up in Cleveland.

(03-28-2018, 02:06 PM)McC Wrote: Barkley is so special because he never has to come off the field.  He's a three down back.  Run, catch, pass pro.  He's got it all.   It ain't hype.  It's reality.  He's the best player in the draft and that is damn near unanimous. 

Just pray along with me he does not end up in Cleveland.

(03-28-2018, 02:20 PM)Nately120 Wrote: The Browns are going QB at 1 and probably the best defensive player at 4, so it's pretty safe to say Barkley won't end up in Cleveland.  If Barkley is so amazing there will be multiple teams looking to deal into the top 5 or 6 picks to get him.  Actually, if we would have stayed at 12 we could have had a chance to trade up a reasonable amount to get him ourselves but we didn't.

(03-28-2018, 03:41 PM)McC Wrote: My fear is that the QB's are similar enough that Cleveland takes Barkley first and still gets one of the QB's, possibly even the one they really wanted all along.

(03-28-2018, 01:47 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: He can't be the best RB prospect in the last 15-20 years, AP was drafted in 2007, and SB is no where near the RB that AP is/was.
But every year, someone is always the best at their position in the last 10-15 years. Let's ask Montee Ball, Ron Dayne, Lawrence Phillips, Trent Richardson, Blair Thomas, Ronnie Brown William Green, Kevin Jones, Beanie Wells, David Wilson (I think you get the picture now). Almost all of those RB's were "can't misses" and "best RB's in years to hit the NFL".
So forgive me if I don't buy the Barkley "Hype" for now.

(03-27-2018, 10:07 AM)jeremydc Wrote: I wouldn't be surprised if the Browns end up 3rd in the division.

(03-28-2018, 07:59 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: I'm not saying I don't buy the Barkley hype, but they do say this a lot.

Trent Richardson, Todd Gurley, Zeke Elliott and Leonard Fournette were all supposedly "the best RB in 10 years".

That said, 3 of those 4 guys wound up being pretty damn good. And some of those guys you listed weren't really hyped like that (Beanie, Ronnie Brown, William Green, David Wilson, etc.)

(04-01-2018, 09:35 AM)CornerBlitz Wrote: Not only are 3 of the 4 guys pretty damn good but they all made a very positive impact on their team.  A stellar RB in his prime can change the entire dynamics of an offense. I'm fearful Barkely will do the same for Cleveland.