(08-02-2019, 05:34 PM)Au165 Wrote: Perception isn’t reality, I’m going with the organization who is contracted by NFL teams and Casinos on this one. Even if you use PfF data, haven’t seen it from them for last year, over the previous three years no one runs any coverage more than roughly 75% of the time, and that has never included an Austin defense.

(08-02-2019, 05:36 PM)Synric Wrote: I would like to see the data. Link?

(08-02-2019, 05:45 PM)Au165 Wrote: Here is a tweet from a writer referencing the man stats through 16 weeks.

https://mobile.twitter.com/KeeganAbdoo/status/1078722411338522624/photo/1

(08-02-2019, 05:45 PM)Au165 Wrote: Here is a tweet from a writer referencing the man stats through 16 weeks.

https://mobile.twitter.com/KeeganAbdoo/status/1078722411338522624/photo/1

(08-02-2019, 05:48 PM)Synric Wrote: So according to their data they were in man 43% and zone 41%.

(08-02-2019, 05:45 PM)Au165 Wrote: Here is a tweet from a writer referencing the man stats through 16 weeks.

https://mobile.twitter.com/KeeganAbdoo/status/1078722411338522624/photo/1

(08-02-2019, 05:54 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: What in the name of common core math is going on there?  If you pick any team, add up their percentages of attempts faced in zone and man, it never comes to 100%.  And what's worse?  The combined total varies from team to team..

(08-02-2019, 05:42 PM)grampahol Wrote: Maybe I'm wrong, but I think Austin's scheme was the infamous, "Stand around and get torched and blame it on someone else soon as you get fired scheme" .. 

(08-02-2019, 05:52 PM)Au165 Wrote: Doesn’t include screens prevent or combo coverages, if our wondering why it isn’t 100%.

(08-02-2019, 05:58 PM)Synric Wrote: Don't know why they would discount screens but prevent and combos are mostly zones also would love to see how it breaks down by game because they were alot heavier in man coverage under Marvin.

(08-02-2019, 05:54 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: What in the name of common core math is going on there?  If you pick any team, add up their percentages of attempts faced in zone and man, it never comes to 100%.  And what's worse?  The combined total varies from team to team..

(08-02-2019, 05:42 PM)grampahol Wrote: Maybe I'm wrong, but I think Austin's scheme was the infamous, "Stand around and get torched and blame it on someone else soon as you get fired scheme" .. 

(07-30-2019, 06:47 PM)NKURyan Wrote: I love how you're always so negative here but you were still a total fangirl about going to the first practice of training camp and getting Eifert's autograph.

(08-03-2019, 12:08 PM)McC Wrote: From yesterday's practice--

https://www.bengals.com/news/camp-report-band-on-the-run

A few things--

The offense got their manhood back against the defense yesterday.

Jeff Driskel having a very good camp.  Hitting on about 80% of his passes, which seems a far cry from his scatter gun passing last year.

John Ross day to day, says he is ready to go but coaches being cautious with him.

Josh Malone making plays but still struggling some with consistency.

(08-02-2019, 02:27 PM)Joelist Wrote: No one said zone is universally bad, however it is bad for us with the players we have in our secondary. Dre, Jackson and Dennard are all better when playing Man. And it is especially bad when you play the kind of soft zones we were doing especially with Austin.

Thanks for the updates Holic and McC and whoever else has been updating. Been reading them but was out of town last week again and don't like posting on my phone. Hope Ross gets healthy and on track with Dalton for heck sake. Getting tired defending the guy. I do think our Offense will be much better this year regardless as long as the O-line plays okay. Definitely think the Defense will be much better than last season. Exciting times, football is back baby.