(03-10-2017, 11:32 AM)Okeana Wrote: What they should do is require that all cap space is used by a team before Revenue sharing kicks in.

(03-10-2017, 03:58 PM)yellowxdiscipline Wrote: So someone answer this for me. When all the dust is settled and we've paid everyone, rookies, extensions, etc and we roll into the offseason with still about 10 million left of cap space. Then the league says you can only roll over 6 million into next seasons cap, what happens to the other 4 million? Does it go into Mikes pockets or do we lose it?

(03-10-2017, 04:08 PM)OrlandoBengal Wrote: It is insulting to the fans.  Somehow they think that we either cannot do simple math or do not have access to the internet and the independent sites which do the math for us.

Yesterday I told my wife about losing Whit and Zeitler.  Her response "can we finally root for a team that is good and cares about winning"?

(03-10-2017, 03:58 PM)yellowxdiscipline Wrote: So someone answer this for me. When all the dust is settled and we've paid everyone, rookies, extensions, etc and we roll into the offseason with still about 10 million left of cap space. Then the league says you can only roll over 6 million into next seasons cap, what happens to the other 4 million? Does it go into Mikes pockets or do we lose it?

(03-10-2017, 04:12 PM)Wyche Wrote: ......and isn't she from Brazil?  Oh my.....how stupid are we?

(03-10-2017, 07:11 PM)OrlandoBengal Wrote: Yep, my Brasilian bombshell!  What's funny is that eight years ago she knew absolutely nothing about football, today she knows more than some fans...

This does not apply to most of the people on this board, but I've been reading through Cincy Jungle posts on FB the last couple days and am amazed at how many people tow the Mike Brown/company line.  I've always wondered if there is anyone who actually buys the BS that Hobson puts out... turns out there are a lot

(03-10-2017, 05:51 PM)wolfkaosaun Wrote: I don't want to hear the whole "Oh we don't have enough money to sign players".

The Eagles had $11 million in cap space. Meanwhile, they come out with Alshon Jeffrey, Torrey Smith, and Chance Warmack.
What did they do for that to happen? They cut Conner Barwin. Saves them a little over $7 million.

Or look at the Ravens. They had $10 million. Yet re-sign Brandon Williams to the highest contract for a NT and also signs Tony Jefferson.
What did they do for this to happen? They cut Dumervil, Lewis, and Wright. Dumervil gave them $8 million alone.

Meanwhile we still have Maualuga and Pacman on our team. But even then, we still have around the same numbers as those two teams AFTER signing our own guys.

(03-10-2017, 10:30 AM)Okeana Wrote: per

http://www.bengals.com/news/article-1/Dre-plays-on-with-Bengals-Whats-next/a87a5caf-4f9d-4764-a06e-bc76b7801261

discussion

http://www.cincyjungle.com/2017/3/10/14877174/bengals-2-3-million-left-spend-free-agency



I can't understand how the front office is coming up with these numbers.  I'm not seeing the details on the Kirkpatrick deal yet, but even if we did eat 15 million in a cap hit for this year this still only accounts for 15 mil of 38-42 million of space they had.  I can understand if they want to allocate that money to Burfict and Eifert, but why not extend them now and eat as much cap this year so next year you can clear some of it off.

One thing the bengals really need to improve upon is learning when to move on from players to keep their stars.  Michael Johnson, Peko, Rey Mal all should be gone by this point.  Pacman is debatable, but I think its clear at this point we need that money and not an aging CB with off the field issues.

(03-10-2017, 11:03 AM)Okeana Wrote: I understand we are a small market team and we will never be able to spend like one of the premier teams, but even after draft contracts about 15 million is still clear before cuts.

Cuts :

Hill 1.2 million
Sims 1 million
Pacman 6.3 million
Rey Mal 3.6 million
Michael Johnson 2.6 million

Total space cleared 14.7 million

leaving a total cap after rookie contracts somewhere in the 30 million range.

(03-10-2017, 07:45 PM)t3r3e3 Wrote: There is a salary cap.  The Bengals are on equal financial terms with all teams in terms of allocatable salary.  They just choose to pocket some and not spend what they could.  Small market is only an issue in baseball, where there is no salary cap.  Mike Brown is, and will continue to be, cheap.  It's how he's been able to buy out the other team owners and maximize family earnings.

(03-10-2017, 10:30 AM)Okeana Wrote: per

http://www.bengals.com/news/article-1/Dre-plays-on-with-Bengals-Whats-next/a87a5caf-4f9d-4764-a06e-bc76b7801261

discussion

http://www.cincyjungle.com/2017/3/10/14877174/bengals-2-3-million-left-spend-free-agency



I can't understand how the front office is coming up with these numbers.  I'm not seeing the details on the Kirkpatrick deal yet, but even if we did eat 15 million in a cap hit for this year this still only accounts for 15 mil of 38-42 million of space they had.  I can understand if they want to allocate that money to Burfict and Eifert, but why not extend them now and eat as much cap this year so next year you can clear some of it off.

One thing the bengals really need to improve upon is learning when to move on from players to keep their stars.  Michael Johnson, Peko, Rey Mal all should be gone by this point.  Pacman is debatable, but I think its clear at this point we need that money and not an aging CB with off the field issues.

(03-13-2017, 03:26 PM)Hammerstripes Wrote: Keep in mind one thing:

The Bengals (or Hobson) have never said that they only have $2million left under the cap, they have only said that they only have 2-3 million left under what they budgeted for free agency.