Nate's 2nd Mock... - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: Draft Central (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-9.html) +--- Thread: Nate's 2nd Mock... (/thread-10845.html) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Nate's 2nd Mock... - Crowe - 04-25-2017 (04-24-2017, 04:11 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Howard just wasn't used as much of a pass catching TE at Bama. Doesn't mean he couldn't be a great pass True. I just think TE is not a major need unless Eifert were to miss extended time this season. Howard could blossom into a star, but I want Uzo to get more snaps as he played well in his limited time last season, plus think we could get an efficient TE in the mid rounds. Our first round pick needs to be a homerun in an area we desperately need and Howard would be more of a luxury pick this season than a need pick. I think if we double dip anywhere it needs to be pass rusher and oline. I think we draft 1 WR and 1 RB and then look at our own guys on the PS. Overall good post Nate! RE: Nate's 2nd Mock... - ochocincos - 04-25-2017 (04-19-2017, 01:45 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: I think his main reason for falling (potentially) is because the athleticism he demonstrated at the Combine doesn't show up on tape. I'm hopeful that the time he trained from the end of the season through the Combine actually means he will show more bend the NFL, but I understand those hesitant on him based on his tape. Whether he has bend or not, he still had 20.0 sacks and 31.5 TFL the past two seasons against the Big 12, which is known for its high powered offenses and weaker defenses. Derek Barnett had only 3.0 more sacks and the same TFLs as Willis in the past two seasons. I think they are similar players on the field, but Willis showed to be a (much) better athlete at the Combine. RE: Nate's 2nd Mock... - XenoMorph - 04-25-2017 (04-25-2017, 09:56 AM)Crowe Wrote: True. I just think TE is not a major need unless Eifert were to miss extended time this season. Howard could blossom into a star, but I want Uzo to get more snaps as he played well in his limited time last season, plus think we could get an efficient TE in the mid rounds. Our first round pick needs to be a homerun in an area we desperately need and Howard would be more of a luxury pick this season than a need pick. While eifert is great. I think we can get buy a few games if hes out with Hewitt kroft and Uz RE: Nate's 2nd Mock... - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 04-25-2017 (04-25-2017, 09:56 AM)Crowe Wrote: True. I just think TE is not a major need unless Eifert were to miss extended time this season. Howard could blossom into a star, but I want Uzo to get more snaps as he played well in his limited time last season, plus think we could get an efficient TE in the mid rounds. Our first round pick needs to be a homerun in an area we desperately need and Howard would be more of a luxury pick this season than a need pick. Well i cannot disagree with this Crowe, good post yourself. RE: Nate's 2nd Mock... - bengalsdude - 04-25-2017 (04-18-2017, 03:17 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: 1st round - OJ Howard TE Alabama - This is sounding more and more likely with Eifert's injuries, this guy is the best TE Big fan. Top 2 guys have measurables to support being (potentially) pro bowl caliber players. Solid guys in the mid rounds and a nice set of projects and potential role players late. Checks all the boxes for me! :andy: RE: Nate's 2nd Mock... - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 04-25-2017 (04-25-2017, 08:27 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: Looooove this draft. Would be doing backflips. My only concern is that I haven't seen a lot of two TE sets out of Zampese, and I really like what I saw in Uzomah in limited action. Also, if they don't sign Eifert, are we basically just trading paint and are the same team? Howard is probably higher rated as a prospect than Ross, so I could see the Bengals doing this, but I really, really like what I think Ross could do for this team. Thanks dude, i understand the OC questions cause i have them too with Zamp. We will see, i did it as a mixture of what i see and what i want happening. (04-25-2017, 08:59 AM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: So, I just did a SIM draft and our drafts are extraordinarily similar haha. So, I take back the criticism . I need to check that out brother. Getting close and i am getting a bit excited. Drinking a beer loving life as we speak. Lots of ways to go in this draft. Saw Hobspin went Howard/Kpassagnon 1,2 which is a reach IMO on Kpass at 41, would rather have the more polished Willis. RE: Nate's 2nd Mock... - CJD - 04-25-2017 (04-25-2017, 11:01 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Thanks dude, i understand the OC questions cause i have them too with Zamp. http://thebengalsboard.com/Thread-CJD-Mock-0 I agree that Kpass is a reach in round 2. He just screams Margus to me. RE: Nate's 2nd Mock... - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 04-25-2017 (04-25-2017, 11:09 PM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: http://thebengalsboard.com/Thread-CJD-Mock-0 Just saw yours, pretty cool it played out so similar lmao. Like them both and both are very realistic from what i am seeing so close to draft day. Agreed on Kpass, he is another project, i would take him in the 3rd or later. Take the more polished End in the 2nd. You would think we would of learned from Hunt wouldn't you? RE: Nate's 2nd Mock... - Crowe - 04-26-2017 (04-25-2017, 11:24 AM)XenoMorph Wrote: While eifert is great. I think we can get buy a few games if hes out with Hewitt kroft and Uz I agree. I think drafting Howard next year would be more ideal, doing it this year could send a message to Eiftert that we want to replace you. I also think that if Eifert is healthy than Howard sits the bench more often than not. I personally want to see Uzo, Kroft, and Hewitt get more reps as they've all shown nice things, but in small sample sizes due to Eifert being the main guy. If we take Howard than we drop one of those guys and now we have nothing to show for it. Grabbing a guy like Hodges or Butt or Shaheen in the mid rounds would be ideal for me and it's not like I hate Howard, I just don't like him this year in the first. RE: Nate's 2nd Mock... - Crowe - 04-26-2017 (04-25-2017, 05:17 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Well i cannot disagree with this Crowe, good post yourself. Lol thanks brother! Looking forward to draft day this year! RE: Nate's 2nd Mock... - pledgi - 04-27-2017 (04-18-2017, 03:17 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: 1st round - OJ Howard TE Alabama - This is sounding more and more likely with Eifert's injuries, this guy is the best TE I'd be psyched with the first six picks. After that give me Gonzalez and BPA's and I'm a happy camper. RE: Nate's 2nd Mock... - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 04-27-2017 (04-27-2017, 02:59 AM)pledgi Wrote: I'd be psyched with the first six picks. After that give me Gonzalez and BPA's and I'm a happy camper. Yeah, i have been just leaving out a kicker hoping Bullock is the guy. Might be the wrong strategy but hey, this is my last mock and i had to take the players i like the best. Kickers, meh. RE: Nate's 2nd Mock... - Emeritus - 04-27-2017 If we get it!!! Wow Love the mock |