+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html)
+--- Thread: Stock Market "Buy" signals - 2016 deficiencies seem Upgraded in most areas for 2017 (/thread-11954.html)
Pages:
1
2
RE: Stock Market "Buy" signals - 2016 deficiencies seem Upgraded in most are... - Luvnit2 - 08-10-2017
(08-10-2017, 12:44 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: According to Hobspin. Please stop spreading that lie. We've seen how in the past that's not always as exactly the same as they have claimed.
Unless they offered a $5m signing bonus, they didn't offer the exact same 2017 money. If the Rams cut him after 2017, he walks away with $12.5m. That's not the exact same money as offering a guy a 1yr/$9m deal with $0 signing bonus and $0 guaranteed money.
Actually had a conversation with former Bengals OL who told us Whittworth turned down the Bengals guaranteed 1 year deal that was a little higher than the Rams 2017 offer, but he wanted a 2 year deal and Bengals would not do a 2 year deal due to his age. What is your scource?
RE: Stock Market "Buy" signals - 2016 deficiencies seem Upgraded in most are... - THE PISTONS - 08-10-2017
(08-10-2017, 10:43 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Actually had a conversation with former Bengals OL who told us Whittworth turned down the Bengals guaranteed 1 year deal that was a little higher than the Rams 2017 offer, but he wanted a 2 year deal and Bengals would not do a 2 year deal due to his age. What is your scource?
I read something similar too. They offered him a 1 year deal for somewhere around the Rams offer...but wouldn't go to 2 years.
RE: Stock Market "Buy" signals - 2016 deficiencies seem Upgraded in most are... - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-11-2017
(08-10-2017, 10:43 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Actually had a conversation with former Bengals OL who told us Whittworth turned down the Bengals guaranteed 1 year deal that was a little higher than the Rams 2017 offer, but he wanted a 2 year deal and Bengals would not do a 2 year deal due to his age. What is your scource?
(08-10-2017, 10:45 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: I read something similar too. They offered him a 1 year deal for somewhere around the Rams offer...but wouldn't go to 2 years.
Heard this as well and makes me think they didn't want to pizz off Whit by franchise tagging him either.
This way he had a shot at a multiple year deal. MB and company are loyal to players like Whit and you don't want to stifle
the man if he gets a better deal elsewhere. No point bringing the man back if he is angry.
They might of made the right decision, sure as hell hope so and Og plays decent.