Michael Johnson - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Michael Johnson (/thread-12004.html) |
RE: Michael Johnson - Socal Bengals fan - 08-13-2017 (08-13-2017, 09:19 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: 19. Cincinnati Bengals But but but, Marvin lewis says hes good . And he knows more than us RE: Michael Johnson - NATI BENGALS - 08-13-2017 I was an MJ fanboy. He was good at one point. Just like Geathers. Teams move on. Looking like its that time RE: Michael Johnson - Atomic Orange - 08-14-2017 Maybe he needs to grow the hair back out and get some better glasses. He lost his edge when he got paid. Went studious and soft. It's my opinion he is trying to save his brain because he has plans after the game. Which is fine but i think he thinks about it too much. RE: Michael Johnson - samhain - 08-14-2017 Doubt they'll cut him this season, but maybe they can at least limit his snaps. There are now viable options now, unlike in previous seasons. Willis and Lawson will be hard to deny if MJs play continues to drop off. I look for him to be cut after this season. Less dead money and a good cap hit avoided. Might need it to re-up Burfict and/or Eifert. RE: Michael Johnson - Shake n Blake - 08-14-2017 (08-13-2017, 09:59 PM)RoyleRedlegs Wrote: Welp. lol. I think we have something with those guys (Lawson/Willis). Time to trim the fat. I'd keep Clarke over MJ as he costs a lot less. RE: Michael Johnson - CornerBlitz - 08-14-2017 (08-13-2017, 07:46 PM)OrangeLacroix Wrote: I dont understand why he's on the team I think just looking at his sack numbers and making conclusions based upon only that is not fair. With that said, he is overrated, most games I barely notice him, he makes very little impact in the pass rush department. Even if he is above average at playing the run and/or holding the edge, I'm not a fan. I want my starting 4-3 end to get to the QB consistently. RE: Michael Johnson - Housh - 08-14-2017 He literally disappeared when he left for Tampa. Who would've thought playing with Atkins and Dunlap made him better RE: Michael Johnson - Housh - 08-14-2017 If you teach a guy to do nothing but seal the edge I bet we could get a guy in 1 off-season who could MATCH MJs production Dude just Isn't worth starting over a younger high draft pick. RE: Michael Johnson - muskiesfan - 08-14-2017 There are many reasons to cut Johnson, but cap space isn't one of them. The Bengals are still sitting on almost $18m in cap space. Upgrades and extensions are/were possible without cutting Johnson. RE: Michael Johnson - Au165 - 08-14-2017 I saw one play where MJ spun and fell down without much effort from the lineman...that's when I knew it was over. I think we Keep Dunlap, Clarke, Willis and if he keeps playing well Chris Smith. We can the bring Lawson in as a swing DE to give us extra depth. RE: Michael Johnson - Hoofhearted - 08-14-2017 (08-14-2017, 09:12 AM)Au165 Wrote: I saw one play where MJ spun and fell down without much effort from the lineman...that's when I knew it was over. I think we Keep Dunlap, Clarke, Willis and if he keeps playing well Chris Smith. We can the bring Lawson in as a swing DE to give us extra depth. This one? https://twitter.com/BillyM_91/status/896155153266393088?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cincyjungle.com%2F2017%2F8%2F11%2F16136788%2Fbengals-vs-buccaneers-6-winners-2-losers-from-preseason-opener Worst spin move ever. Just spins in place. Dude isn't even giving effort anymore. RE: Michael Johnson - SHRacerX - 08-14-2017 (08-13-2017, 08:35 PM)Socal Bengals fan Wrote: Hes been a non factor since he left to Tampa Bay. How can someone be so unproductive with Atkins and Dunlap getting so much attention. I would have cut him yesterday. Hes soft and just not very good at football. I was a hater on Maualuaga , peko n MJ. Need one more for trifecta This is the point I have made so many times. Fred would always quote a stat of MJ getting a "hurry" where he was 10 yards upfield, totally out of the play, and a QB would scramble towards him and be like "what are you doing up here"? before running off. The synergy across the front four when a QB has fear of his blind side rush has been something I've been waiting for and we now have it. MJ and Gilberry won't likely be let go because of the Bengal's loyalty, but this whole recognition of a lack of speed and the additions of Smith and Willis should at least regulate those guys to the bench. If MJ is starting over Willis, we clearly have lost our minds. RE: Michael Johnson - Au165 - 08-14-2017 (08-14-2017, 09:19 AM)Hoofhearted Wrote: This one? Yep, that is the moment Michael Johnson's career ended haha RE: Michael Johnson - bengals73 - 08-14-2017 (08-14-2017, 09:19 AM)Hoofhearted Wrote: This one? I think he was just practicing his ballet for after football. RE: Michael Johnson - ochocincos - 08-14-2017 (08-13-2017, 09:14 PM)RoyleRedlegs Wrote: People have conformed to the Bengals way of "Familiarity is more important than being good" HOLY CRAP IT'S ROYLE! GLAD YOU'RE BACK!! :andy: RE: Michael Johnson - Socal Bengals fan - 08-14-2017 MJ was pancacked 4 times in a series n half. Any other team would have cut him hy now RE: Michael Johnson - Socal Bengals fan - 08-14-2017 Geathers, peko, 58, MJ , thornton, crocker all guys that should have been cut rather then letting them play out their contacts RE: Michael Johnson - SHRacerX - 08-14-2017 (08-14-2017, 09:19 AM)Hoofhearted Wrote: This one? I always wondered why he never tried inside pass rushing moves...after seeing that the other night, I know why. RE: Michael Johnson - Au165 - 08-14-2017 (08-14-2017, 10:00 AM)Socal Bengals fan Wrote: MJ was pancacked 4 times in a series n half. Any other team would have cut him hy now Like I said, I think he gets cut but they are going to make sure the young guys can handle everything over the next couple weeks first. RE: Michael Johnson - OrangeLacroix - 08-14-2017 So, had the Bengals just released PacMan and MJ, how much savings would that equate to? 13 mill/year? |