![]() |
Best Bengal to wear #82 - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Best Bengal to wear #82 (/thread-16024.html) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Best Bengal to wear #82 - Shake n Blake - 05-21-2018 No disrespect to Holman (he was very good), but we have people on here saying he was an all-time great and FAR better than McGee, but the stats say otherwise. He wasn't even the best TE in team history (Trumpy was), but he's an all-time great? Far better than a guy that put up similar stats with far inferior QB play? Put Tony on that team with Boomer and all that play action, and I bet he'd be the one people remember fondly. Heck, he put up nearly identical numbers to Holman with QB's like Klingler, Akili and Frerotte. RE: Best Bengal to wear #82 - rfaulk34 - 05-21-2018 (05-20-2018, 06:02 PM)Go Cards Wrote: Holman hands down Ditto. RE: Best Bengal to wear #82 - Truck_1_0_1_ - 05-21-2018 (05-21-2018, 02:56 PM)shanebo Wrote: This. Loved Tony McGee, but Holman was just on another level -- in the conversation of all-time great TEs, IMO. (05-21-2018, 05:30 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: As someone who watched every game that Rodney played as a Bengal and knows the respect he earned around the league as both a talented receiver and an very effective blocker - it was just weird to hear someone say he wasn't a 'good blocker'. I stand corrected, will shut up and crawl back into the hole, whence I came from. RE: Best Bengal to wear #82 - rfaulk34 - 05-22-2018 (05-20-2018, 02:55 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: McGee played with better receivers (Pickens and Darnay). Still produced similar numbers to Holman with inferior QB play. It's kind of amazing how similar those eras were. Both TEs were young and in their prime. They both had very good #1 and #2 receivers (who both only participated in 5 of the 6 years i'll post below), young and in their prime and they both had really good QBs (holman more the mcgee) throwing the ball for a period of time. Holman had the benefit of a QB that put up good numbers every year, while he had the disadvantage of playing along side of not only good receivers but also Mr. James Brooks, who had a lot of catches and yards in those years. It's hard to pick one over the other because how similar they are, but Holman is going to get the nod because of the era he played in and the guys he played with that won playoff games and went to a SB. Just gonna throw these numbers in since i spent the time putting them together. 2 different 6 year spans which were the prime of the 2 TEs. catches, yards, TDs holman 85-90 235 3346 28 brown 304 5307 39 mcgee (5 years) 183 3318 17 brooks 223 2396 23 mcgee 93-98 233 2994 16 pickens 447 5824 56 scott (5 years) 261 4134 27 RB?? (by committee) RE: Best Bengal to wear #82 - John Shaft - 05-22-2018 Rodney Holman hands down. There is no grading curve based on playing on crappy teams. RE: Best Bengal to wear #82 - shanebo - 05-22-2018 (05-21-2018, 11:30 PM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: I stand corrected, will shut up and crawl back into the hole, whence I came from. LOL. Don't get me wrong, I love McGee -- he was a very good player for the Bengals, but generally more of a "safety valve"/third-option type player. Holman was dynamic. When they spread him wide and he beat a cb or fs on a flag or post it was awesome. From the late 80s until the early 90s, after Winslow and Christensen had retired and Newsome had begun to fade, Holman was the best TE in the NFL not named Keith Jackson (and that was a close call). Certainly the best in the AFC, probably until Shannon Sharpe came into his own. RE: Best Bengal to wear #82 - Truck_1_0_1_ - 05-23-2018 (05-22-2018, 12:26 PM)shanebo Wrote: LOL. Don't get me wrong, I love McGee -- he was a very good player for the Bengals, but generally more of a "safety valve"/third-option type player. Holman was dynamic. When they spread him wide and he beat a cb or fs on a flag or post it was awesome. From the late 80s until the early 90s, after Winslow and Christensen had retired and Newsome had begun to fade, Holman was the best TE in the NFL not named Keith Jackson (and that was a close call). Certainly the best in the AFC, probably until Shannon Sharpe came into his own. Essentially, I'll never trust videogames again (where I was getting that he wasn't a good blocker) in a conversation like this! |