We have a problem at RB - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: We have a problem at RB (/thread-20799.html) |
RE: We have a problem at RB - psychdoctor - 08-18-2019 (08-18-2019, 02:00 PM)pally Wrote: Per Zac presser...Williams out the remainder of preseason with a foot injury. Seattle game not guaranteed I would not feel comfortable keeping T. Williams on the 53 roster. Yes, he is talented but two games, two injuries. Williams has had "5" carries for 9 yards compared to Elllis's 18 carries for 63 yards. Small sample size I know but still, I would like players to be able to play and not worry every time the player gets hit. RE: We have a problem at RB - masonbengals fan - 08-18-2019 Ellis has showed he belongs. RE: We have a problem at RB - bengalfan74 - 08-18-2019 (08-18-2019, 02:58 PM)pally Wrote: He can't go on PUP. He has practiced and played Well there goes that. The reserve injury to return list ? I dunno RE: We have a problem at RB - psychdoctor - 08-18-2019 (08-18-2019, 03:09 PM)bengalfan74 Wrote: Well there goes that. The reserve injury to return list ? I dunno I believe only one player can return from IR mid season. They may need it for AJ Green. Let's hope not. J. Williams has the fantasy that he will be back before season end. Not sure about that either. Seems like options are limited for the talented RB. RE: We have a problem at RB - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-18-2019 (08-18-2019, 02:59 PM)psychdoctor Wrote: I would not feel comfortable keeping T. Williams on the 53 roster. Yes, he is talented but two games, two injuries. I worry more about Anderson than Traveon. Way bigger history of injuries than Traveon. I keep Traveon for his talent on the roster, he would just not dress. This happens with a lot of players. No way i cut Traveon Williams cause of two bad luck injuries in Preseason before he even gets 10 carries. Way too talented. Dude could be a legitimate star. RE: We have a problem at RB - psychdoctor - 08-18-2019 (08-18-2019, 05:16 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: I worry more about Anderson than Traveon. Way bigger history of injuries than Traveon. Anderson's injury history has been sort of freakish. Hopefully he can play because Anderson is special talent. Graceful bull-dog on the run. RE: We have a problem at RB - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-19-2019 (08-18-2019, 11:42 PM)psychdoctor Wrote: Anderson's injury history has been sort of freakish. Hopefully he can play because Anderson is special talent. Graceful bull-dog on the run. Traveon is even more talented, much faster and can break a big run any second. Led all of college in TD's and yards. I like Rodney but his injury history is crazy concerning. Not going to throw Traveon in his category after 2 injuries where he misses a few games. Anderson missed seasons in college and is not near the explosive threat Traveon is. RE: We have a problem at RB - yellowxdiscipline - 08-19-2019 (08-16-2019, 09:06 PM)jj22 Wrote: And a good one to have. Well Williams is pretty banged up and could get pup'd. Ive liked what ive seen out of Ellis so far. I think overall we did a good job drafting running backs this year. RE: We have a problem at RB - SunsetBengal - 08-19-2019 (08-19-2019, 08:00 AM)yellowxdiscipline Wrote: Well Williams is pretty banged up and could get pup'd. Ive liked what ive seen out of Ellis so far. I think overall we did a good job drafting running backs this year. Pup'd? I always understood it to be that if a player practiced or played, he was ineligible for the P.U.P. list. RE: We have a problem at RB - yellowxdiscipline - 08-19-2019 (08-19-2019, 08:28 AM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Pup'd? I always understood it to be that if a player practiced or played, he was ineligible for the P.U.P. list. Does preseason count? I thought that only was a regular season thing. I could be wrong though. RE: We have a problem at RB - grampahol - 08-19-2019 I have doubts Ellis makes it, but I've been wrong before. I see nothing to indicate Taveon's injury is serious enough to preclude him from much other than preseason games, but on the other hand just the very mention of the word "dinged" with the Bengals can mean anything from double amputations of both legs to a minor scratch shaving.. I hate vague terminology like "dinged". It's meaningless and misleading at best. It sounds like something that happens to a refrigerator during shipment. a ding and dent sale.. RE: We have a problem at RB - jj22 - 08-19-2019 (08-19-2019, 08:28 AM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Pup'd? I always understood it to be that if a player practiced or played, he was ineligible for the P.U.P. list. You are correct. He's practiced (and played). He won't be eligible for PUP. RE: We have a problem at RB - Bengalitis - 08-19-2019 I'd take Ellis over Anderson. Kinda like the Colts, how's Luck doing for you? The Colts have been none factor while nursing their talented QB for years now. If you can't play, you can't win. RE: We have a problem at RB - jj22 - 08-19-2019 There was really no reason to rush Anderson into action. Ellis reminds me of a young CJ Anderson. But a much bigger weapon in the passing game. RE: We have a problem at RB - Au165 - 08-19-2019 There are 100 backs in the NFL just like Ellis, nothing really special about the guy. He doesn't make guys miss and his vision is pretty limited. As the last back on the roster you could do worse I guess, but I'm not going to get super excited about a guy carving up 2nd and 3rd team defenses. He kind of reminds me of Cedric Peerman. A guy who runs really hard right at guys and sometimes will break one. RE: We have a problem at RB - SunsetBengal - 08-19-2019 (08-19-2019, 10:52 AM)jj22 Wrote: There was really no reason to rush Anderson into action. He plays hard. Tough to not like that in a prospect. RE: We have a problem at RB - Bengalitis - 08-19-2019 (08-19-2019, 10:53 AM)Au165 Wrote: There are 100 backs in the NFL just like Ellis, nothing really special about the guy. He doesn't make guys miss and his vision is pretty limited. As the last back on the roster you could do worse I guess, but I'm not going to get super excited about a guy carving up 2nd and 3rd team defenses. He kind of reminds me of Cedric Peerman. A guy who runs really hard right at guys and sometimes will break one. We need healthy RBs... that is the reason we still have Gio after all these years. RE: We have a problem at RB - Au165 - 08-19-2019 (08-19-2019, 11:00 AM)Bengalitis Wrote: We need healthy RBs... that is the reason we still have Gio after all these years. The only way he gets on the roster is if Williams goes to IR, upside over a totter all day. Like I said you can go out on the street and find guys like him. If I am going youth they better have huge upside because there will be a bunch of unemployeed veteran HB's week 1 that are better than him that you can get cheap. RE: We have a problem at RB - BengalsRocker - 08-19-2019 (08-17-2019, 02:05 PM)mallorian69 Wrote: Does anyone that has good LB depth need a RB? If so as much as I love Gio trade him and get a decent LB. Back when they picked Williams I thought it should be a strong possibility for parting with Gio. Especially if it involved signing/trading for a serviceable linebacker. Now I'm not so sure. Gio might just need to be here for his durability as well as his talent. Oh well... RE: We have a problem at RB - McC - 08-19-2019 (08-19-2019, 10:48 AM)Bengalitis Wrote: I'd take Ellis over Anderson. Kinda like the Colts, how's Luck doing for you? The Colts have been none factor while nursing their talented QB for years now. If you can't play, you can't win. Uh...hello...the Colts were in the playoffs last year and Luck threw 39 TD passes. Does the truth even fit in your mouth? |