![]() |
Glasgow gone - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Glasgow gone (/thread-23293.html) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Glasgow gone - ochocincos - 03-17-2020 (03-17-2020, 07:49 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Agree on many points. I will add that I don't get Mike Brown's fascination with players that line up furthest from the ball, being the highest priority on his list of people to pay. I get what you mean, but SF completely gashed the Bengals last season by going outside with their RBs. It was embarrassing. They need edge defense too. RE: Glasgow gone - SunsetBengal - 03-17-2020 (03-17-2020, 07:54 PM)ochocincos Wrote: I get what you mean, but SF completely gashed the Bengals last season by going outside with their RBs. It was embarrassing. They need edge defense too. A great set of LBs and Safeties would put a stop to that shit.. RE: Glasgow gone - ochocincos - 03-17-2020 (03-17-2020, 08:01 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: A great set of LBs and Safeties would put a stop to that shit.. It would. Which is why I really was hoping/expecting an upper-tier LB in FA. With Littleton, Collins, Kirksey, Kwiatkoski, and Van Noy all gone, I don't see any upper-tier LBs left. Makes me think they address on Day 2 of the draft, but they also need a good starter at LG (don't talk about hopes and dreams of Jordan), so it will be interesting to see how they address everything. RE: Glasgow gone - Synric - 03-17-2020 (03-17-2020, 08:34 PM)ochocincos Wrote: It would. Which is why I really was hoping/expecting an upper-tier LB in FA. They have met with a few of linebackers through the draft process. Queen, Murray, AGD, Evans. |