Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake (/thread-26301.html) |
RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - SuperBowlBound! - 12-30-2020 (12-30-2020, 05:35 PM)wildcatnku24 Wrote: It's no surprise, but I think ZT is gonna make a believer outta ya'll next year. It takes more than one year to fix the BS that he started with. This city is broken in terms of professional sports. It's gonna take some work. We knew that before, we need to know that now. I second this thought! Let the man have time to get it done. This year was a very difficult year for a team that really needed a pre season. I also like that Burrow likes him and his team plays hard for him. Not like we were getting blown out every game. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - Sled21 - 12-30-2020 (12-30-2020, 10:06 PM)SuperBowlBound! Wrote: I second this thought! Let the man have time to get it done. This year was a very difficult year for a team that really needed a pre season. I also like that Burrow likes him and his team plays hard for him. Not like we were getting blown out every game. Yep, everyone knows where I stand on it, I still think Taylor will be the guy that takes us back to the Super Bowl, it's just going to take time. But, he has to produce at least 9 wins next year RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - SuperBowlBound! - 12-30-2020 (12-30-2020, 05:55 PM)wildcatnku24 Wrote: Flores is a hell of a coach, and I don't even wanna argue that one. Ha! I do like Flores as a coach but he has been lucky this year with injuries. He has 3 guys on IR. Davon Godchaux (NT) makes 650K a year, Vince Biegel (OLB) has a 1 year contract making 2,133,000 and Preston Williams (WR) making 588,000 a year. Coaching is a lot easier when you are coaching the same guys every week. None of the Miami Dolphins injuries were to guys in their top 40 salary commitments to. Zak Taylor and his staff have 10 players out for the year. 6 out of their top 10 salary commitments have not played most of the year. Some weeks I was not sure who they would even have to fill in for all of the injured players. Very tough year for all of the NFL especially teams who have lost a lot players to injuries. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 12-30-2020 (12-30-2020, 09:53 PM)Nately120 Wrote: ZT and Adam Gase have both clearly "gotten it" in these past few weeks and will be vying for the AFC Championship in 2021. Book it.* Yes sir. Good teams with good coaches win close games, don't make excuses for losing them. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - Sled21 - 12-30-2020 (12-30-2020, 10:36 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Yes sir. Good teams with good coaches win close games, don't make excuses for losing them. And coaches, like players, imrove with time. Players tend to hit their groove in the 3rd year. Not sure the timeline for coaches, but Taylor is definitely drafting well and his play calling is getting better. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - SuperBowlBound! - 12-30-2020 (12-30-2020, 10:27 PM)SuperBowlBound! Wrote: I do like Flores as a coach but he has been lucky this year with injuries. He has 3 guys on IR. Davon Godchaux (NT) makes 650K a year, Vince Biegel (OLB) has a 1 year contract making 2,133,000 and Preston Williams (WR) making 588,000 a year. Coaching is a lot easier when you are coaching the same guys every week. None of the Miami Dolphins injuries were to guys in their top 40 salary commitments to. Zak Taylor and his staff have 10 players out for the year. 6 out of their top 10 salary commitments have not played most of the year. Some weeks I was not sure who they would even have to fill in for all of the injured players. Very tough year for all of the NFL especially teams who have lost a lot players to injuries. The only other team with as many injuries to their top 10 existing contracts is ironically the Jacksonville Jaguars. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - THE PISTONS - 12-30-2020 (12-30-2020, 06:25 PM)Hammerstripes Wrote: The 5 win stat is a little dicey for me as we surely would have had 6-7 wins if Burrow hand't gotten hurt, but either way, I don't know that keeping Taylor is a great idea. Maybe Zac chucks it 55 times versus the Steelers and we lose. Same with the Texans game. Not as easy as thinking we win the same games plus more. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - THE PISTONS - 12-30-2020 (12-30-2020, 08:11 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: Even if you bump it to 6 wins or less in the first 2 years, since 2000, 15 of the 24 coaches didn't make it past year 3. Of the 9 who did, 6 didn't make it past a 4th. Turner had 7 (3 winning years), Schwartz had 5 (1 winning year) and Kyle Shanahan. This is the Bengals...6-10 in year 3 probably gets him another year if some of those wins are late in the year. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - THE PISTONS - 12-30-2020 (12-30-2020, 09:53 PM)Nately120 Wrote: ZT and Adam Gase have both clearly "gotten it" in these past few weeks and will be vying for the AFC Championship in 2021. Book it.* Yeah the Chiefs were a little luck away from being 7-8 with Reid talking about how close they were. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 12-30-2020 (12-30-2020, 10:38 PM)Sled21 Wrote: And coaches, like players, imrove with time. Players tend to hit their groove in the 3rd year. Not sure the timeline for coaches, but Taylor is definitely drafting well and his play calling is getting better. If we keep Zac I sure hope this is the case but what Holic just shown sure doesn't make it look likely Sled. Very good Drafting though since ZT got here except for the Finley pick have to admit. Love the Jonah, Pratt, Burrow, Higgins, Wilson, ADG, Adeniji picks for damn sure. Sample isn't as bad as some say either. Of course everyone would of rather had DK Metcalf, but Sample is decent. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - THE PISTONS - 12-30-2020 (12-30-2020, 10:06 PM)SuperBowlBound! Wrote: I second this thought! Let the man have time to get it done. This year was a very difficult year for a team that really needed a pre season. I also like that Burrow likes him and his team plays hard for him. Not like we were getting blown out every game. What qb wouldnt like a coach that throws 50 times a game. Zac calls plays like Madden. Doesnt mean it's the right approach to win. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - Nately120 - 12-30-2020 (12-30-2020, 10:38 PM)Sled21 Wrote: And coaches, like players, imrove with time. Players tend to hit their groove in the 3rd year. Not sure the timeline for coaches, but Taylor is definitely drafting well and his play calling is getting better. If coaches improve with time we might be in trouble because despite having no pre-season, losing their best WR to injury, and having issues related to covid the Browns managed to win 10+ games with a rookie HC. That's the issue with playing the waiting game with ZT. We are the odd-man out any way you slice it. Ravens/Harbaugh 12 years as HC - 1 SB ring Regular season: 127–79 (.617) Postseason: 10–7 (.588) Career: 137–86 (.614) Steelers/Tomlin 13 years as HC - 1 SB ring Regular season: 145–77–1 (.652) Postseason: 8–7 (.533) Career: 153–84–1 (.645) Browns/Stefanski 1st year as HC Regular season: 10–5 (.667) Postseason: TBD probably 0-1 Bengals/ZT 2 years as HC Regular season: 6–24–1 (.210) Postseason: 0-0 It was easier to play the "wait and see" game when we at least had the Browns flopping with Fatty Kitchens and Hue. Now that they've rebooted their team with a rookie HC we have one team that turned on a dime and two teams that have had the same HC for over a decade and have championships and winning records in the regular and post season. No one else in this division had to wait 3+ years for their HC to "get it" so why did we? Is Stefanski going to improve? If so the Browns could give us trouble for a long time. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - THE PISTONS - 12-30-2020 (12-30-2020, 10:38 PM)Sled21 Wrote: And coaches, like players, imrove with time. Players tend to hit their groove in the 3rd year. Not sure the timeline for coaches, but Taylor is definitely drafting well and his play calling is getting better. Ridiculous. Coaches improve like players. Totally ridiculous. Good coaches are generally good coaches from the start and dont take a 6 win team to a 2 win team. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - THE PISTONS - 12-30-2020 (12-30-2020, 10:42 PM)SuperBowlBound! Wrote: The only other team with as many injuries to their top 10 existing contracts is ironically the Jacksonville Jaguars. What you're missing is we sucked when guys like Burrow and Reader were healthy. It's not like we started well then injuries derailed the year. Injuries are an excuse. AJ and Jonah were the excuses last year. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - GreenCornBengal - 12-30-2020 I wish we knew more about Zac’s contribution to the signings of Dunlap, Atkins and Green. If he pushed for it, then he is a moron. If they reluctantly wrote up those contracts against ZTs suggestions/wishes then I still have faith in the guy. He’s been hamstrung to start his coaching career. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - THE PISTONS - 12-30-2020 (12-30-2020, 10:56 PM)Nately120 Wrote: If coaches improve with time we might be in trouble because despite having no pre-season, losing their best WR to injury, and having issues related to covid the Browns managed to win 10+ games with a rookie HC. That's the issue with playing the waiting game with ZT. We are the odd-man out any way you slice it. Dont tell him how the Steelers are 12-3 either with 2 really good LBs hurt too. We're the only team with injuries and only our coaches improve! Year 3 baby! Zac is entering his prime!!! RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - THE PISTONS - 12-30-2020 (12-30-2020, 11:04 PM)GreenCornBengal Wrote: I wish we knew more about Zac’s contribution to the signings of Dunlap, Atkins and Green. If he pushed for it, then he is a moron. If they reluctantly wrote up those contracts against ZTs suggestions/wishes then I still have faith in the guy. He’s been hamstrung to start his coaching career. How about when we signed BW Webb, Wynn, and a bunch of scrub free agents from the coaches former teams? Think that had a hand in that? RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 12-30-2020 (12-30-2020, 10:56 PM)Nately120 Wrote: If coaches improve with time we might be in trouble because despite having no pre-season, losing their best WR to injury, and having issues related to covid the Browns managed to win 10+ games with a rookie HC. That's the issue with playing the waiting game with ZT. We are the odd-man out any way you slice it. Reps Nately. No time to wait around while you might have the next great QB. This coaching staff under ZT got him injured, the ones responsible need to be held as such. We need to be at the very least be contending with all these teams with our players. Losing close games doesn't make me feel better, wouldn't make Andy Reid feel better, not Belichick or Tomlin or Harbaugh. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - Nately120 - 12-30-2020 (12-30-2020, 11:04 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: Dont tell him how the Steelers are 12-3 either with 2 really good LBs hurt too. I'm not going to mock anyone for hoping ZT can get it, particularly since it's clear he's going to be here at least 1 more year. With that being said, the reality that we are in a division with two teams with long-term successful coaches and another team that has a 10+ win rookie HC makes it hard to look at ZT as needing more time and more like he's just not all that good. The Browns didn't wait for Kitchens or Hue to snap out of it and get better, and their first year into hiring a guy who actually had a shot at being good has done them wonders. We are hoping our HC can do in year 3 what the Browns did in year 1? That's not the sort of scenario Bengals fans would have gladly accepted, I fear. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - SuperBowlBound! - 12-30-2020 (12-30-2020, 11:01 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: What you're missing is we sucked when guys like Burrow and Reader were healthy. It's not like we started well then injuries derailed the year. We may have started slow due to no preseason and rookie QB. We were in almost every game. I believe we would have been 7-9 or 8-8 if we only had 2-3 injuries to similar players the Dolphins had injured. Love to see how many games Dolphins would have won had they had injuries to 6 of their top 10 player contracts like us. |