Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) (/thread-27639.html) |
RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - SHRacerX - 05-03-2021 (05-03-2021, 06:48 AM)WhoDey Wrote: "Are" Could have been Aaaargh...and you would think this was the Buccaneers message board. RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - yang - 05-03-2021 (05-03-2021, 09:05 AM)Schmitbuck Wrote: I agree that more free agents will likely be added. It does seem that the UDFA signings are down compared to other years. Agreed on Kerrigan, but I am not sure on the 3T. There is a lot of talk about moving to some new fronts in a 3-4 hybrid that Shelton could anchor and use Hubbard and Sample in the 3T as inside rushers. Ossai and even ADG can be used to rush from various spots. We need to figure out how to stop the run in this division along with getting pressure on passing downs. RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Cicero - 05-03-2021 (05-02-2021, 10:49 PM)Murdock2420 Wrote: What do you see on the Bengals roster that the Eagles would even want? I think we still have the rights to Sean Brewer. RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 05-03-2021 (05-03-2021, 10:43 AM)yang Wrote: Agreed on Kerrigan, but I am not sure on the 3T. There is a lot of talk about moving to some new fronts in a 3-4 hybrid that Shelton could anchor and use Hubbard and Sample in the 3T as inside rushers. Ossai and even ADG can be used to rush from various spots. We need to figure out how to stop the run in this division along with getting pressure on passing downs. You mean Shelvin, but yeah. He can man Nose in a 3-4 set no question. Hubert too can fit in this scenario. We speak about this every year lol but we might be seeing more 3-4 sets with these selections. Ossai and ADG are a lot alike honestly in their athleticism and body types it is just Ossai is WAY more pro ready as a rookie. I bet this guy can be a game changer right off the bat. RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Hammerstripes - 05-03-2021 (05-03-2021, 03:43 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: You mean Shelvin, but yeah. He can man Nose in a 3-4 set no question. Hubert too can fit in this scenario. We speak about this Yeah, the reality is that we will have 2 or fewer linebackers on the field 80% of the time. All these 3-4 and 4-3 sets people talk about are only used about 10-12 plays per game. RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 05-03-2021 (05-03-2021, 03:46 PM)Hammerstripes Wrote: Yeah, the reality is that we will have 2 or fewer linebackers on the field 80% of the time. All these 3-4 and 4-3 sets people talk about are only used about 10-12 plays per game. Just saying we might see it a little more now with these selections. I agree, we definitely aren't going to a primary 3-4 set. Will be in a 5-2 set most of the time with Wilson and the best other LB IMO. Lots of competition now I just think Wilson is the main man after what he shown as a rookie and us not bringing back Bynes. Need to use Ossai as a pass rusher and as a down hill defender. Guy is great at getting TFL... RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - OSUfan - 05-03-2021 (05-02-2021, 09:32 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: I have been saying it for month, trade for Zac Ertz, a complete TE. Sample and Uzomah both are three down TEs. RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Chezaugie - 05-03-2021 (05-03-2021, 04:28 AM)EasyPeasy Wrote: I'm genuinely concerned that anyone with English as a first language cannot differentiate between "are" and "our." I don't even care about were/we're. Or starting a contentless thread with a bullshit title implying there's actual content. It's inconceivable. A troll? Speach-to- text gaffe?You were doing OK until "Speach-to-text." Is English your first language? JK RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - EasyPeasy - 05-03-2021 (05-03-2021, 05:28 PM)Chezaugie Wrote: You were doing OK until "Speach-to-text." Is English your first language? JK I could of done better RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Go Cards - 05-03-2021 (05-03-2021, 03:43 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: You mean Shelvin, but yeah. He can man Nose in a 3-4 set no question. Hubert too can fit in this scenario. We speak about this Looking forward to seeing Ossai in Stripes RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Shouldamapads - 05-03-2021 I had a dream that the Bengals bought a time machine and went and got a young Gene Upshaw to play guard. I’m sure it will come true. RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Chezaugie - 05-04-2021 (05-03-2021, 06:57 PM)EasyPeasy Wrote: I could of done better Welcome to the club! RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 05-05-2021 (05-03-2021, 07:39 PM)Go Cards Wrote: Looking forward to seeing Ossai in Stripes He wasn't in any of my thoughts cause I thought he would be gone in the 2nd and I thought we HAD to take an OL in the 2nd. For Ossai to drop to us in the 3rd and grab him up was insane in a great way. Can cover, tackle, rush the passers is great at getting tackles for loss, takes great angles with speed. Will be fun watching this guy. RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 - 05-06-2021 (05-03-2021, 03:46 PM)Hammerstripes Wrote: Yeah, the reality is that we will have 2 or fewer linebackers on the field 80% of the time. All these 3-4 and 4-3 sets people talk about are only used about 10-12 plays per game. Or against Baltimore. RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - fredtoast - 05-28-2021 (05-03-2021, 04:28 AM)EasyPeasy Wrote: I'm genuinely concerned that anyone with English as a first language cannot differentiate between "are" and "our." I don't even care about were/we're. Or starting a contentless thread with a bullshit title implying there's actual content. It's inconceivable. A troll? Speach-to- text gaffe? If you want to play grammar Nazi you should learn how to write complete sentences and not use made up words like "contentless" RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Yogo - 05-28-2021 (05-02-2021, 09:32 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: I have been saying it for month, trade for Zac Ertz, a complete TE. So.... no Moss? RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 05-28-2021 (05-28-2021, 05:27 PM)fredtoast Wrote: If you want to play grammar Nazi you should learn how to write complete sentences and not use made up words like "contentless" He had multiple gaffes in his grammar Nazi critique lol RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 05-28-2021 (05-28-2021, 05:30 PM)Yogo Wrote: So.... no Moss? Thaddeus makes the team, Ertz is Luvnit's pipe dream. RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - SunsetBengal - 05-28-2021 (05-28-2021, 05:27 PM)fredtoast Wrote: If you want to play grammar Nazi you should learn how to write complete sentences and not use made up words like "contentless" Agreed, but I can imagine that he's simply expressing his discontent with the lack of content in the OP.. RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - felis tigris - 05-28-2021 (05-28-2021, 05:27 PM)fredtoast Wrote: If you want to play grammar Nazi you should learn how to write complete sentences and not use made up words like "contentless" Recognizing this to be excessively pedantic, I believe there should be a comma after "Nazi," "made up" should be hyphenated, and "contentless" is, in fact, recognized by both Merriam-Webster and Oxford Dictionaries as a legitimate word. |