![]() |
Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets) - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets) (/thread-27823.html) |
RE: Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets) - SHRacerX - 06-03-2021 (06-03-2021, 02:52 PM)ochocincos Wrote: The shorter the routes, usually the higher the completion percentage. That's a little harsh. He made a one-handed grab last season that would have been on a ton of highlight reels if it were someone like Gronk. RE: Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets) - ochocincos - 06-03-2021 (06-03-2021, 03:36 PM)SHRacerX Wrote: That's a little harsh. He made a one-handed grab last season that would have been on a ton of highlight reels if it were someone like Gronk. Fair enough. I was referring more to gaining a good chunk of yardage on a play. His longest yards gained on a reception was 23 last year and 21 the year before. By comparison, Uzomah's longest reception was 54 yards, Eifert's longest was 71 yards, and Gresham's longest was 55 yards. RE: Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets) - BengalChris - 06-03-2021 (06-03-2021, 08:51 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: I was looking up the RB numbers on targets to try and project how many will go Mixon's way if he would be healthy all season. (I settled on 60 targets with 50 receptions...but I digress). My guess was Sample, which obviously turned out to be right. However, catch % is just one stat and not enough of one for me to believe he should start. I don't know how many targets he had and haven't looked up a thing, but my guess is that he wasn't a factor as a receiver. RE: Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets) - BengalsRocker - 06-03-2021 (06-03-2021, 02:01 PM)SHRacerX Wrote: I know a couple of those were my personal favorite: The TE screen. Sample is underrated here as both a blocker and as a receiver. Probably the fact that he was "overdrafted" in the minds of many in Rd 2. That's all fine and good but I've seen flashes from Uz his whole career that makes me want to see more. Not a single one from Sample except maybe that grab you mentioned. I hope the guy proves me wrong but if you looked up the definition of "meh" in the dictionary Drew's picture should be beside it. Hey at least I'm not throwing the "B" word in this discussion. RE: Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets) - SunsetBengal - 06-03-2021 (06-03-2021, 11:24 AM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: It should be no surprise he lead the team in catch percentage. When the ball travels and average of 3.8 yards and you're usually completely uncovered it's only logical that you're going to have a higher catch percentage than those who actually running legitimate routes in legitmate coverages. Okay, so he did really well at what he was asked to do. Is it really his fault that the team only asked him to be a blocker and dump off guy? RE: Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets) - Synric - 06-03-2021 (06-03-2021, 11:24 AM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: Here's some interesting stats from Drew Sample, which you can check here in the "Advanced Receiving and Rushing": Deeper TE-Y routes depend on play action. RE: Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets) - Shake n Blake - 06-03-2021 I guessed Sample because TEs almost always have a higher catch % than WR's, because they generally run shorter/easier routes. Then I guessed that the TE would be Sample because it's implied that you were surprised. Easy peezy. RE: Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets) - Wes Mantooth - 06-03-2021 (06-03-2021, 08:44 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Okay, so he did really well at what he was asked to do. Is it really his fault that the team only asked him to be a blocker and dump off guy? We'll have to agree to disagree on the "he did really well at what he was asked to do" part. Almost any TE could do really well at catching 4 yard passes. The question I have is why they asked him to do so little. CJ Uzomah, who on his very best day is average at best, was asked to do something very different in weeks 1 and 2 playing in the same exact offense, with the same playbook and with the same personnel. Why would they completely change how the position is used once Sample became TE1? My guess is because he's an absolutely garbage receiving threat and they know it. I'm sorry, but whoever called for this pick needs to be removed from football decisions immediately. They ought to be out of the league. You don't draft a guy in the 2nd round that is this much of a nobody in the pass game. You can find players like this in the late rounds, if not as UDFA's. RE: Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets) - sandwedge - 06-03-2021 (06-03-2021, 08:44 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Okay, so he did really well at what he was asked to do. Is it really his fault that the team only asked him to be a blocker and dump off guy? Took the words out of my mouth. Guy does what is asked of him. RE: Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets) - sandwedge - 06-03-2021 (06-03-2021, 09:35 PM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: We'll have to agree to disagree on the "he did really well at what he was asked to do" part. Almost any TE could do really well at catching 4 yard passes.You'd be surprised at how wrong you are. Finding a TE that is very good at blocking and very good at catching the ball is rare. RE: Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets) - BengalsRocker - 06-03-2021 (06-03-2021, 10:23 PM)sandwedge Wrote: Took the words out of my mouth. Guy does what is asked of him. Man I hope you're right. Wasn't targeted in college. Used in sparse receiving role in pros. Just a victim of circumstances? We shall see... RE: Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets) - Wes Mantooth - 06-03-2021 (06-03-2021, 10:29 PM)sandwedge Wrote: You'd be surprised at how wrong you are. Finding a TE that is very good at blocking and very good at catching the ball is rare. He's not very good at catching the ball. (????????) Have you looked at his numbers? He's a complete non-factor in the pass game. Despite finishing top 5 in snaps played he's sub 30 in production. RE: Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets) - impactplaya - 06-03-2021 Defensive coordinators arent afraid of Sample.when.the ball.is In his hands. Even in.the red.zone Sample is a non.factor to DCs RE: Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets) - Shake n Blake - 06-03-2021 (06-03-2021, 11:05 PM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: He's not very good at catching the ball. ???????? I'm not sure we have a big enough Sample size to judge him yet. ![]() RE: Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets) - grampahol - 06-03-2021 I have no issues with Sample. Short passes? Tom Brady makes a pretty good living with short passes all day.. RE: Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets) - SHRacerX - 06-04-2021 (06-03-2021, 06:04 PM)ochocincos Wrote: Fair enough. Good point. Sample is, after one complete season (his rookie year was mostly injured), a better blocker than either of the other three. RE: Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets) - Essex Johnson - 06-04-2021 (06-03-2021, 11:55 AM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: Here's a list of the top 41 Tight Ends in 2020 (I included Uzomah for the +1) and their Average Yards Before Catch: Though it was just 2 games.. CJ showed early returns in those two games that he might be headed to a very solid top 10 TE year.. hope he starts off this year like last year... RE: Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets) - ochocincos - 06-04-2021 (06-04-2021, 07:39 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: Good point. Sample is, after one complete season (his rookie year was mostly injured), a better blocker than either of the other three. He's a good blocker. But what good teams nowadays don't deploy a TE who at least has decent pass catching ability? If your TE on the field is often being kept in as a blocker and/or not much of a threat in the passing game, you're losing a playmaker. Sample may be one of the best blockers, but he's one of the worst in terms of receiving production. The Bengals don't even have a TE on the list of Top 32 preseason rankings on PFF - https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-pff-tight-end-rankings-2021-nfl-season It's pretty bad when you don't even make it above a guy like Blake Jarwin. Jarwin was a UDFA who had 307-3 in 2018 and 365-3 in 2019 with DAL before only playing a single game last year due to injury. Jarwin still had a better 2019 than Sample had in 2020. Not good if a 2nd round pick is less productive as a pass catcher than a UDFA on another team. And before anyone says Sample was just used as a blocker so much, he had the 15th-most receiving snaps out of all TEs (433). He had more receiving snaps than Mark Andrews, who put up 701-7 last year. RE: Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets) - sandwedge - 06-04-2021 (06-03-2021, 11:05 PM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: He's not very good at catching the ball. (????????) He was targeted 53 times and caught 40 balls. That is 75%. RE: Don't cheat: Which Bengal had the highest catch% (receptions/targets) - bengalfan74 - 06-04-2021 The only thing I can say is I hope with an improved line, healthy JB, and ZT get his play calling together We see improved numbers from Sample. Is he ever going to be a top tier TE ? I doubt it |