Reiff and Hopkins inactive - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Reiff and Hopkins inactive (/thread-29511.html) |
RE: Reiff and Hopkins inactive - PlayadLc - 12-05-2021 We’ll be fine. RE: Reiff and Hopkins inactive - pally - 12-05-2021 Keaton Sutherland is taking reps at center during warmups RE: Reiff and Hopkins inactive - rfaulk34 - 12-05-2021 (12-05-2021, 02:01 PM)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: This could be the first regret game for: Doubtful. If i'm being honest, i'd rather they sit Trey and Riley to get healthy for a stretch run instead of risking further injury and it lingering. One game, at home. No need for anyone to panic just yet. RE: Reiff and Hopkins inactive - Bengalitis - 12-05-2021 (12-05-2021, 02:01 PM)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: This could be the first regret game for: lol... nah. But it will give us an easy what-to-draft next season B) RE: Reiff and Hopkins inactive - Tony - 12-05-2021 Why not Play Carmen at RT? RE: Reiff and Hopkins inactive - Tony - 12-05-2021 (12-05-2021, 02:01 PM)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: This could be the first regret game for: Both bad takes.. Both these guys playing horrible this year. Especially Price. Have you even watched the Giants? I'd much rather have BJ Hill , who is producing.. RE: Reiff and Hopkins inactive - bfine32 - 12-05-2021 Welp, that Hill dude is not the answer RE: Reiff and Hopkins inactive - TheFan - 12-05-2021 (12-05-2021, 02:18 PM)PlayadLc Wrote: We’ll be fine. We were not fine. RE: Reiff and Hopkins inactive - PlayadLc - 12-05-2021 (12-05-2021, 06:46 PM)TheFan Wrote: We were not fine. Nope. I honestly thought they’d be better. The difference between Hopkins and Reiff compared to Hill and Prince was far greater than I imagined. Those two got worked all game today. RE: Reiff and Hopkins inactive - Frank Booth - 12-05-2021 (12-05-2021, 02:42 PM)Tony Wrote: Both bad takes.. Both these guys playing horrible this year. Especially Price. Have you even watched the Giants? I'd much rather have BJ Hill , who is producing.. This is half a bad take. Price is horrible, Hill is good. I agree Sewell is having a very good rookie campaign and is the real deal RE: Reiff and Hopkins inactive - Big_Ern - 12-05-2021 (12-05-2021, 07:32 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: This is half a bad take. Price is horrible, Hill is good. I agree Not as good as slater. RE: Reiff and Hopkins inactive - Frank Booth - 12-05-2021 (12-05-2021, 07:51 PM)Big_Ern Wrote: Not as good as slater. ? Ok ? Are you going to get into a 2021 draft pissing contest again? Give it a break RE: Reiff and Hopkins inactive - TheLeonardLeap - 12-05-2021 (12-05-2021, 07:51 PM)Big_Ern Wrote: Not as good as slater. Don't think anyone expected him to be as good as Slater his rookie year. Slater always had the higher starting point, but Sewell was the one with the much higher ceiling. Both were expected to be good. Slater is 1.5 years older than Sewell. Sewell actually turned 21 AFTER Week 4 this year. - - - - - - - - - As for Reiff, hopefully that is the only game he'll miss this year. We pretty much knew he was going to miss at least 1 at some point. He hadn't played a full season since 2015. Hopefully he plays the rest. RE: Reiff and Hopkins inactive - Fan_in_Kettering - 12-05-2021 (12-05-2021, 07:32 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: Sewell is having a very good rookie campaign and is the real deal He’s a Lion; wrong species of cat. At this point the offensive line is so broken in Cincinnati merely drafting Penei Sewell would not have cured all ills. Every quarterback in the league seems to have more time to throw and gets hit less than Joe Burrow. Joe Mixon had a great week against the Steelers and performed terribly against the Chargers badly-ranked rush defense. RE: Reiff and Hopkins inactive - Frank Booth - 12-05-2021 (12-05-2021, 07:58 PM)Fan_in_Kettering Wrote: He’s a Lion; wrong species of cat. I was simply responding to tony who said that Sewell is playing horrible this year that’s just false. I would’ve corrected him if he said something false about some guy on the 49ers RE: Reiff and Hopkins inactive - Big_Ern - 12-05-2021 (12-05-2021, 07:52 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: ? Ok ? Lol. You brought it up. I was pointing out he wasn't the best option RE: Reiff and Hopkins inactive - Big_Ern - 12-05-2021 (12-05-2021, 07:56 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Don't think anyone expected him to be as good as Slater his rookie year. Slater always had the higher starting point, but Sewell was the one with the much higher ceiling. Both were expected to be good. Slater is 1.5 years older than Sewell. Sewell actually turned 21 AFTER Week 4 this year. He is but he's playing at an all pro level at Lt. Sewell ain't passing him RE: Reiff and Hopkins inactive - Frank Booth - 12-05-2021 (12-05-2021, 08:02 PM)Big_Ern Wrote: He is but he's playing at an all pro level at Lt. Sewell ain't passing him Yea you don’t seem biased at all lol RE: Reiff and Hopkins inactive - TheLeonardLeap - 12-05-2021 (12-05-2021, 08:02 PM)Big_Ern Wrote: He is but he's playing at an all pro level at Lt. Sewell ain't passing him Whitworth still playing better than both right now. RE: Reiff and Hopkins inactive - Big_Ern - 12-05-2021 (12-05-2021, 08:08 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: Yea you don’t seem biased at all lol I'm not. Many guys in the first would have served us well. Including Parsons |