![]() |
Bengals D message to the naysayers-FEA - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Bengals D message to the naysayers-FEA (/thread-31055.html) |
RE: Bengals D message to the naysayers-FEA - PhilHos - 02-11-2022 (02-11-2022, 12:32 PM)fredtoast Wrote: The guys who have been here more than three weeks know that they deserved to be "doubted" coming into the playoffs because they looked weak during the season. Sure, doubted coming into the PLAYOFFS, but they should NOT be doubted/ignored heading into the Super Bowl considering the defense has played pretty darn well in the playoffs. Hell, people are STILL claiming Mahommes imploded but giving almost not credit to the Bengals D for causing the implosion. Everyone's talking about the Rams defensive line (deservedly so) but no one's pointing out that the Bengals defense has twice as many sacks this postseason than the Rams defense (almost no one, anyway, I got the stat from somewhere, obviously). So, sure, the defense heading into the playoffs couldn't really complain about being overlooked, but now, going into the Super Bowl? Yes, they can. RE: Bengals D message to the naysayers-FEA - fredtoast - 02-11-2022 (02-11-2022, 12:54 PM)PhilHos Wrote: Sure, doubted coming into the PLAYOFFS, but they should NOT be doubted/ignored heading into the Super Bowl considering the defense has played pretty darn well in the playoffs. People don't forget an entire season just because of how you perform in the playoffs. How many Bengal fans here are ignoring the fact that Stafford has outplayed Burrow in the postseason? RE: Bengals D message to the naysayers-FEA - PhilHos - 02-11-2022 (02-11-2022, 01:05 PM)fredtoast Wrote: People don't forget an entire season just because of how you perform in the playoffs. Don't know but I bet the number is not nearly as many pundits, analysts, and fans who are ignoring the fact that Trey Hendrickson outplayed Aaron Donald in the regular season. RE: Bengals D message to the naysayers-FEA - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 02-11-2022 (02-11-2022, 12:54 PM)PhilHos Wrote: Sure, doubted coming into the PLAYOFFS, but they should NOT be doubted/ignored heading into the Super Bowl considering the defense has played pretty darn well in the playoffs. Hell, people are STILL claiming Mahommes imploded but giving almost not credit to the Bengals D for causing the implosion. No doubt. That 2nd half Mahomes just imploded, had nothing to do with us changing it up and going with a 3 man front and covering everything down the field while getting pressure. Had absolutely nothing to do with it. ![]() ![]() Bengals D message to the naysayers-FEA - BenZoo2 - 02-11-2022 (02-10-2022, 08:05 PM)Interceptor Wrote: It's the Joe Burrow Effect. I’m down with this . And F.E.A! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk RE: Bengals D message to the naysayers-FEA - J24 - 02-11-2022 (02-10-2022, 09:55 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: I think you are right, Lou just had to have the right personnel and a good DL in front of the LB's and his Secondary.Truth be told our defense has played well when healthy when he has been at the helm. The problem is we were not healthy in 2019(first part) and after week 5 last season. This year the unit has been healthy for the most part and we have seen success because of it. RE: Bengals D message to the naysayers-FEA - fredtoast - 02-11-2022 (02-11-2022, 04:27 PM)J24 Wrote: This year the unit has been healthy for the most part and we have seen success because of it. Bottom half of the league in both points and yards allowed. Improved, but not very good. Definitely not as good as we have looked in the playoffs. And if that carries through the Super Bowl then it is all that matters. RE: Bengals D message to the naysayers-FEA - fredtoast - 02-11-2022 (02-11-2022, 02:29 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: No doubt. That 2nd half Mahomes just imploded, had nothing to do with us changing it up and going with a 3 man front Actually there have been multiple video breakdowns posted here that shows that a lot of it really was Mahommes playing poorly in the second half. Kurt Warner pointed out multiple plays were a receiver was open and Pat just threw the ball the wrong place. Our defense was not covering everyone as perfectly as you think. RE: Bengals D message to the naysayers-FEA - motoarch - 02-11-2022 I mean he's not wrong but ehh I'm not a fan of the execution and also who? RE: Bengals D message to the naysayers-FEA - fredtoast - 02-11-2022 (02-11-2022, 01:28 PM)PhilHos Wrote: Don't know but I bet the number is not nearly as many pundits, analysts, and fans who are ignoring the fact that Trey Hendrickson outplayed Aaron Donald in the regular season. Trey Hendrickson did not come close to outplaying Donald. Donald had twice as many tackles and almost as many sacks PLAYING DT. RE: Bengals D message to the naysayers-FEA - PhilHos - 02-11-2022 (02-11-2022, 04:45 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Trey Hendrickson did not come close to outplaying Donald. Donald also played in more games than Trey. RE: Bengals D message to the naysayers-FEA - fredtoast - 02-11-2022 (02-11-2022, 04:46 PM)PhilHos Wrote: Donald also played in more games than Trey. Doesn't matter. You can't compare Trey's sack numbers playing DE to Donald's numbers playing DT. RE: Bengals D message to the naysayers-FEA - PhilHos - 02-11-2022 (02-11-2022, 04:51 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Doesn't matter. You can't compare Trey's sack numbers playing DE to Donald's numbers playing DT. Yes, I can. I can also point out that Donald got more than half his sacks and most of his tackles AFTER the Rams acquired Von Miller. RE: Bengals D message to the naysayers-FEA - rfaulk34 - 02-11-2022 (02-11-2022, 04:35 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Bottom half of the league in both points and yards allowed. (02-11-2022, 04:38 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Actually there have been multiple video breakdowns posted here that shows that a lot of it really was Mahommes playing poorly in the second half. Kurt Warner pointed out multiple plays were a receiver was open and Pat just threw the ball the wrong place. (02-11-2022, 04:45 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Trey Hendrickson did not come close to outplaying Donald. Why do you hate the Bengals? RE: Bengals D message to the naysayers-FEA - fredtoast - 02-11-2022 (02-11-2022, 04:54 PM)PhilHos Wrote: Yes, I can. I can also point out that Donald got more than half his sacks and most of his tackles AFTER the Rams acquired Von Miller. 6 sacks in 9 games without Miller. 6.5 sacks in 8 games with Miller. Aaron Donald was First Team All Pro 6 straight years and was NFL Defensive Player of the Year 3 times before Miller arrived. RE: Bengals D message to the naysayers-FEA - PhilHos - 02-11-2022 (02-11-2022, 05:03 PM)fredtoast Wrote: 6 sacks in 9 games without Miller. 6.5 is "more than half" his sack total. Thank you for proving my point. ![]() (02-11-2022, 05:03 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Aaron Donald was First Team All Pro 6 straight years and was NFL Defensive Player of the Year 3 times before Miller arrived. Yep, and still got outplayed by Trey Hendrickson on the frickin' BENGALS this past season. RE: Bengals D message to the naysayers-FEA - fredtoast - 02-11-2022 (02-11-2022, 05:03 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Why do you hate the Bengals? Why do you hate the truth? I can like the Bengals and still admit our defense was not very good during the regular season. And I actually feel sorry for anyone who tries to claim Hendrickson is better than Aaron Donald. Being a Bengal fan does not require me to deny reality and blindly believe stupid BS that other Bengal fans post. This is just a fanbase, not a political party. RE: Bengals D message to the naysayers-FEA - fredtoast - 02-11-2022 (02-11-2022, 05:07 PM)PhilHos Wrote: Yep, and still got outplayed by Trey Hendrickson on the frickin' BENGALS this past season. But the Rams have Sony Michel who outplayed Joe Burrow Michel........845 rushing yards Burrow.......118 rushing yards RE: Bengals D message to the naysayers-FEA - Tony - 02-11-2022 Rams D line is being overrated... They have 5 sacks in 3 postseason games... RE: Bengals D message to the naysayers-FEA - fredtoast - 02-11-2022 (02-11-2022, 05:17 PM)Tony Wrote: Rams D line is being overrated... They have 5 sacks in 3 postseason games... Joe Burrow only has 4 td passes in 3 postseason games. You have to be careful when you are talking about such a small sample size. |