![]() |
Combine participants - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: Draft Central (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-9.html) +--- Thread: Combine participants (/thread-31420.html) |
RE: Combine participants - Synric - 03-03-2022 (03-03-2022, 07:48 PM)Au165 Wrote: Reminds be of Donald Parham (little thicker but faster), think he’s potentially an early day 3 guy that would be worth a chance. I went back and watched Woods after the All Star games. He reminds me of a bit taller Jermaine Gresham. RE: Combine participants - NATI BENGALS - 03-03-2022 (03-03-2022, 10:34 PM)Au165 Wrote: Lot of speed in this class. We need a developmental WR 4 as weird as I know that sounds to people. I think day 3 in the 4th or 5th we will look for speed to add as a potential future Boyd replacement down the road. If it's there I would love if we cemented #1 WR corps in the NFL status. Why not? We won't go into the draft needing a starter anywhere. RE: Combine participants - Nicomo Cosca - 03-03-2022 Alec Pierce…wow.
RE: Combine participants - WVUHomer - 03-04-2022 (03-03-2022, 11:33 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: I really only pay attention to who the Bengals talk to. So far I’ve seen Cade Mays and Daniel Faalele. Yea, that's really who I'm curious about but if there's any prospects you're looking at and think they are going to be a sleeper, maybe you raise the round ranking a tier if you see other teams are interested (if he's YOUR guy) RE: Combine participants - Nicomo Cosca - 03-04-2022 John Ross’ record is still safe.
RE: Combine participants - Synric - 03-04-2022 Ouch...
RE: Combine participants - TecmoBengals - 03-04-2022 (03-04-2022, 02:44 PM)Synric Wrote: Ouch... So if him being undersized causes him to fall to 31, is that spot worth taking him at 31 or a waste of pick? RE: Combine participants - Goalpost - 03-04-2022 O-line bench results at this moment. I don't know if they are completed or just filtering in. https://www.nfl.com/combine/tracker/live-results/bench-press/ol/all-colleges/ RE: Combine participants - TecmoBengals - 03-04-2022 (03-04-2022, 02:59 PM)Goalpost Wrote: O-line bench results at this moment. I don't know if they are completed or just filtering in. Johnson from BC with 32 reps. He's been mocked as available for the Bengals at pick 31. Does he eat glass as well? RE: Combine participants - bfine32 - 03-04-2022 Lots of folks have Rainmann mocked the Cincy at 31. Good bench at 30 reps, great height 6'6", light weight at 303, bad arm length at 32.89" Meanwhile a couple favs: Penning: 6'7', 325, 34.25" Kinnard: 6'5", 322, 35.0" RE: Combine participants - Goalpost - 03-04-2022 https://www.nfl.com/prospects/cole-strange/32005354-5219-1447-a46e-56c3beaaebab Cole Strange surprised me with his strength. He's a potential center prospect. RE: Combine participants - Synric - 03-04-2022 (03-04-2022, 03:20 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Lots of folks have Rainmann mocked the Cincy at 31. Good bench at 30 reps, great height 6'6", light weight at 303, bad arm length at 32.89" Ugh Raimann with sub 33' arms and slow hands not a good combination. RE: Combine participants - bfine32 - 03-04-2022 (03-04-2022, 03:29 PM)Synric Wrote: Ugh Raimann with sub 33' arms and slow hands not a good combination. I'm not tOSU homer, but I think I'd take N P-F over Rainmann. Also their other olineman (Thayer) had a great weigh-in (6'6", 328, 35.18") RE: Combine participants - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 03-04-2022 (03-04-2022, 02:44 PM)Synric Wrote: Ouch... I saw that. Cue the arm length debate. And I saw yesterday he isn’t doing drills at the combine because he is still recovering from foot injury during bowl game. RE: Combine participants - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 03-04-2022 (03-04-2022, 02:58 PM)TecmoBengals Wrote: So if him being undersized causes him to fall to 31, is that spot worth taking him at 31 or a waste of pick? I think his play indicates the arm length isn’t an issue. But, I don’t remember an arm length that short at the combine. And I think it is probably more of an issue for OTs than IOL. But, I ain’t no expert. RE: Combine participants - Synric - 03-04-2022 (03-04-2022, 03:43 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: I saw that. Cue the arm length debate. It's not end all but Arm Length matters. A guy with 31' arms like Tyler Linderbaum will need lightning fast hands to compensate for his lack of length... See Creed Humphrey. RE: Combine participants - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 03-04-2022 (03-03-2022, 09:53 PM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: Also had the most reps on the bench press (24, IIRC), so he's no weakling either. I like it. That would be one big target for Burrow in the Red Zone where we need improvement. (03-03-2022, 10:29 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Dude from Baylor ran an unofficial 4.21 Wheww, caught Ross? ![]() RE: Combine participants - Stewy - 03-04-2022 (03-03-2022, 10:03 AM)TecmoBengals Wrote: Most of the pro sports leagues have bleh features with their websites. Maybe they pay the web guys bottom dollar. Like the refs RE: Combine participants - Stewy - 03-04-2022 (03-04-2022, 04:04 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Wheww, caught Ross? Too bad Ross couldn't.... RE: Combine participants - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 03-04-2022 (03-03-2022, 07:27 PM)Synric Wrote: McBride and Wydermyer definitely look like the top 2 TEs of the group. Smoth routes and Smooth vs the sled. Woods looks good but he had trouble sinking his hips in his in-route and comeback his body control looked very good in his flat route though. After the Senior Bowl I thought Dulcich would be one of my mid to late round sleepers. I don’t think that’s happening now. |