(11-13-2015, 03:14 AM)TRsome Wrote: I think of all smack, my favorite has to be "you're always talking about the Steelers" smack - from Steeler fans on a Bengals board.

(11-12-2015, 03:52 PM)bengals73 Wrote: Wouldn't it be hard to sweep an Opponent that already beat you? 

(11-13-2015, 03:14 AM)TRsome Wrote: YI think of all smack, my favorite has to be "you're always talking about the Steelers" smack - from Steeler fans on a Bengals board.

(11-13-2015, 09:08 AM)6andcounting Wrote: I don't know if I should thank you for agreeing with me or smack you for not being able to read.

(11-13-2015, 10:26 AM)bengals73 Wrote: Must be Pukesburgh speak .. Stillers *Will not* sweep the Bengals. Sounds like they might have a chance.  - Better word would be "cannot"

Consider this your English lesson for the week. 

(11-13-2015, 10:30 AM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: He said they won't.  Which means ... They won't. Sounds pretty definite to me.  

But let's try your theory out: the Browns won't win the Super Bowl.  

Gosh, you're right!  I definitely implied that they could win it all right there, didn't I?  

Just admit you read it wrong and move on.  You're not going to talk yourself out of this one.

(11-13-2015, 11:23 AM)bengals73 Wrote:

(11-13-2015, 11:28 AM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: I'll take that as an admission of wrong-ness.

(11-13-2015, 12:18 PM)bengals73 Wrote: No, just unable to understand straightforward English

(11-13-2015, 12:46 PM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: Fixed it. 

Seriously, man: in what world does "They won't do that" imply "They might do that" ? 

It takes a whole lot more than "nuance" to make that leap. 

(11-13-2015, 01:16 PM)bengals73 Wrote: Doesn't take an English major to understand that "they cannot sweep" sounds much better than "will not sweep" 

However, the Bengals CAN sweep the Stoolers. 

(11-12-2015, 03:14 PM)GMDino Wrote: You'd think Bengals fans would be talking more about them than the Steelers given the Texans knocking the Bengals out of the playoffs two years in a row.

Or playing on Monday when the Bengals have a dismal record in prime time games under Marvin Lewis.

Discuss.

(11-13-2015, 08:25 PM)crispy Wrote: Why do people put "Discuss" at the end of the OP.  It's a ******* message board, of course they are going to discuss.

(11-13-2015, 08:25 PM)crispy Wrote: Why do people put "Discuss" at the end of the OP.  It's a ******* message board, of course they are going to discuss.

(11-13-2015, 10:51 PM)GMDino Wrote: Why do people not put question marks at the end of their questions?

(11-13-2015, 08:25 PM)crispy Wrote: Why do people put "Discuss" at the end of the OP.  It's a ******* message board, of course they are going to discuss.

(11-13-2015, 08:25 PM)crispy Wrote: Why do people put "Discuss" at the end of the OP.  It's a ******* message board, of course they are going to discuss.

(11-13-2015, 10:51 PM)GMDino Wrote: Why do people not put question marks at the end of their questions?

(11-13-2015, 11:07 PM)crispy Wrote: To get you to discuss the lack of question marks at the end of a question.

Discuss

(11-13-2015, 10:10 AM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: ... Said the guy who posted on the only sub-forum that was purposely created to host fans of other teams. In case you hadn't noticed, most of the people who come in here do it because they want to read or post about the Bengals' biggest rival - namely, the Steelers.  What else do you think a smack forum is, Einstein?  

'You're on our board' smack in a smack forum is my favorite type of smack.

(11-12-2015, 03:14 PM)GMDino Wrote: You'd think Bengals fans would be talking more about them than the Steelers given the Texans knocking the Bengals out of the playoffs two years in a row.

Or playing on Monday when the Bengals have a dismal record in prime time games under Marvin Lewis.

Discuss.