This is encouraging... - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: This is encouraging... (/thread-34888.html) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: This is encouraging... - casear2727 - 02-10-2023 (02-10-2023, 12:40 AM)Nately120 Wrote: Does Mikey still love him some comp picks? Mikey is not the only consideration, Burrow is a major one to consider. Also, you guys need to look back at all of our cuts previously, any that weren't injury or disgruntled players we had the backup ready to go for any cut. We do not have a a replacement for Mixon even with Perine and we have no one to take Boyd's spot. Im only stating our historical procedures. If cutting Mixon gets us a very solid OT I'm all for it. I thought we had a much better chance at trading Boyd before last season with 2 years left on his contract so, there's that. RE: This is encouraging... - TheLeonardLeap - 02-10-2023 (02-10-2023, 12:24 AM)Luvnit2 Wrote: One thing I have yet to hear is keeping Boyd, I hear a lot about JB, Chase and Higgins. Because he's making a very reasonable amount and just quietly does his job and does it well. He makes a little less than Tim Patrick and Nelson Agholor and a little more than Russell Gage, DJ Chark, and Marquez Valdez-Scantling. I actually wouldn't be terribly surprised if Boyd gets a relatively cheap 2-3 year extension if they decide to trade Higgins. There's no point in trading Boyd, because you're not going to get much for him, he's not a #1 WR, so nobody is giving up much for him. There's absolutely no point in cutting Boyd because you either cut a player because they're not good/productive (he's good and productive) or you cut them for the money, but it's a contract year, so you're only saving money in 2023, which they have plenty of. Trading or cutting Boyd just doesn't make sense to me. RE: This is encouraging... - Sled21 - 02-10-2023 (02-09-2023, 09:53 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: I don't. Corey Dillon, Carson Palmer.... RE: This is encouraging... - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 02-10-2023 (02-09-2023, 07:08 PM)Speedy Thomas Wrote: I see some parallels here with Tee and Housh. TJ has owned that he made a mistake chasing money and the opportunity to be a "Number One" receiver in Seattle. I would imagine that Tee is well aware of this. Yes, made me feel better about the situation Speedy, thanks. RE: This is encouraging... - bengals67 - 02-11-2023 Priorities Burrow Chase O line Game wrecker pass rusher Bell Much lower Signing tee, hurst , Boyd Bates, or any running backs to second contracts They really tried to fix o line last year but burrow would carve up anyone with the chiefs or eagles o lines. Sub par o line play cost us one Super Bowl and possibly a second. There is only so much money. RE: This is encouraging... - Speedy Thomas - 02-11-2023 (02-11-2023, 02:50 PM)bengals67 Wrote: Priorities Agree with everything you say, 67. We have to keep hitting on the draft and in free agency. Some very hard choices have to be made. I think you have the priorities in correct order. RE: This is encouraging... - Luvnit2 - 02-11-2023 (02-11-2023, 02:50 PM)bengals67 Wrote: Priorities Chase is not a priority in 2023, they can't extend him. Burrow and Higgins are a priority. Knowing Chase will be priority in 2024, Boyd's 9 million net in cap in 2023 may be needed to sign our QB of the defense Bates, Bell may be cheaper, but easier to replace than Bates. Tough decisions await the FO, is Boyd worth 12 million as a 3rd receiver. I say no, grab a TE that can be game changing with 1st round pick. Then the TE because the 3rd down target. RE: This is encouraging... - Soonerpeace - 02-11-2023 (02-11-2023, 04:04 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Chase is not a priority in 2023, they can't extend him. Burrow and Higgins are a priority. Knowing Chase will be priority in 2024, Boyd's 9 million net in cap in 2023 may be needed to sign our QB of the defense Bates, Bell may be cheaper, but easier to replace than Bates. I’m leaning towards the third receiver being a tight end and a one year rental as the third wide receiver every year. To play with Burrow should be enticing. Would love to get Mayer from ND. But I’m leaning towards resigning Hurst ( second year with Burrow I think will help) and getting Broderick Jones UGA OT would be my direction. RE: This is encouraging... - Luvnit2 - 02-11-2023 (02-11-2023, 04:41 PM)Soonerpeace Wrote: I’m leaning towards the third receiver being a tight end and a one year rental as the third wide receiver every year. To play with Burrow should be enticing. Would love to get Mayer from ND. But I’m leaning towards resigning Hurst ( second year with Burrow I think will help) and getting Broderick Jones UGA OT would be my direction. I agree, but if we get Mayer, we may not need Hurst (cap issues). I like Jones from Georgia, it would be a huge help to have him line up next to our right or left tackle, like another OL. RE: This is encouraging... - Soonerpeace - 02-11-2023 (02-11-2023, 08:34 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: I agree, but if we get Mayer, we may not need Hurst (cap issues). I like Jones from Georgia, it would be a huge help to have him line up next to our right or left tackle, like another OL. Drafting Jones should ramp up Williams, Carman, and Collins. |