(02-16-2023, 10:54 AM)casear2727 Wrote: Wow, our defense had barely 100 yards more in penalties as ST.  Terrible.

(02-15-2023, 03:42 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: I hope so. Simmons needs to have a rebound year with the ST in 2023.

McPherson got scary at times.
Punting was a completely predictable disaster that the team just allowed to happen.
Punt coverage was really bad (allowed 6th highest ret avg in the NFL, might be in part because of bad punting).
Kick returning was bad (27th in kick return avg).

(02-16-2023, 10:47 AM)George Cantstandya Wrote: According to this site they had 18 ranking them 5th for most ST penalties:

https://www.nflpenalties.com/phase.php?view=total&year=2022

Panthers, Raiders, Packers, and Steelers had more.  The Chiefs and Commanders were tied with the Bengals at 18.  Per the same website the Bengals had 7 special teams penalties in 2021.  So the ST penalties increased significantly in 2022.   In 2020 they had 6.

(02-14-2023, 09:23 PM)Housh Wrote: That was lame as hell

I looked at him different after that

(02-16-2023, 06:03 PM)pally Wrote: Lammons has been indicted as part of the Alvin Kamara assault case in Vegas from the 2022 Pro Bowl.
It will be interesting to see what Zac will do with this one


Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

(02-16-2023, 06:03 PM)pally Wrote: Lammons has been indicted as part of the Alvin Kamara assault case in Vegas from the 2022 Pro Bowl.
It will be interesting to see what Zac will do with this one


Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

(02-16-2023, 10:46 PM)Nepa Wrote: Just great. Barely became a Bengal and already they list him as a Bengals cornerback committing an assault:

"New Orleans Saints running back Alvin Kamara, Cincinnati Bengals cornerback Chris Lammons and two other men have been indicted by a grand jury for allegedly assaulting a man at a Las Vegas nightclub in February 2022."

And the top headline on ESPN to boot:

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/35674372/saints-alvin-kamara-4-men-indicted-battery-case

(02-16-2023, 11:48 PM)bfine32 Wrote: What should they list him as?

(02-17-2023, 12:45 AM)Nepa Wrote: i worded the sentence poorly. I was trying to indicate barely became a Bengals player and already the organization is getting tied to some bad press. 

I don't know if they can turn around and waive him or cut him, after picking him up on a waiver. And since they picked him up knowing about the alleged assault, they can't claim ignorance or that he broke some code of conduct that nullifies his contract.

(02-16-2023, 11:48 PM)bfine32 Wrote: What should they list him as?

(02-17-2023, 10:29 AM)RunKijanaRun Wrote: I would hope they were aware of his involvement before they picked him up and had reason to believe he didn't do anything worthy of a conviction.

I barely recall the details of this affair, but I'm not crazy about the fact that they picked up a special teamer who had a hand in this.

(02-17-2023, 09:48 AM)Rubekahn29 Wrote: Probably could have given some context, but that’s not what they do. “Newly acquired”  “former Chiefs and newly acquired Bengal”

It’s not hard to come up with brief context.

(02-17-2023, 09:48 AM)Rubekahn29 Wrote: Probably could have given some context, but that’s not what they do. “Newly acquired”  “former Chiefs and newly acquired Bengal”

It’s not hard to come up with brief context.

(02-17-2023, 11:55 AM)TecmoBengals Wrote: I don't know dude. Formally educated journalists or fanboys pretending to be journalists struggle to write anything decent.

(02-17-2023, 01:40 PM)Rubekahn29 Wrote: Very true.