![]() |
Free Agency Prediction Game - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Free Agency Prediction Game (/thread-5278.html) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Free Agency Prediction Game - Shake n Blake - 02-29-2016 (02-29-2016, 08:32 PM)BengalChris Wrote: Eifert would be a great extension. Zietler would also be a nice one to get done. Gio, for all intents and purposes can wait. I don't see any reason to sign a backup RB to an early extension unless it's very team favorable. I was reading an article that claimed Gio should come cheap. They said that backs of his type (receiving backs that get 1000+ total yards but aren't relied on heavily as runners) aren't really getting paid much right now. I'm thinking he makes somewhere around 3-4 million per. People will be surprised. RE: Free Agency Prediction Game - Essex Johnson - 02-29-2016 (02-29-2016, 09:09 PM)BengalChris Wrote: Adam Jones CIN, 2 years, $6.5m AAV [top cover corners are expensive and $6.5M is cheap] I don;t see Rey leaving or Bengals not signing him.. he already is a starter.. he sees the field more than anyone except Burfict RE: Free Agency Prediction Game - BengalChris - 03-01-2016 (02-29-2016, 10:34 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: I was reading an article that claimed Gio should come cheap. They said that backs of his type (receiving backs that get 1000+ total yards but aren't relied on heavily as runners) aren't really getting paid much right now. I'm thinking he makes somewhere around 3-4 million per. People will be surprised. 3-4M is about right. Decided to look up some numbers. Darren Sproles $4.5M Mark Ingram $4M Danny Woodhead $3M Locking up Gio this year isn't critical as meeting those type of contract numbers isn't anything that's going to cause cap trouble. It's really if the team is willing. Woodhead had 80 catches for 755 yards and 6 TD receiving compared to Bernard's 49 catches for 472 yards and 0TDs receiving. Woodhead carried the ball 98 times for 336 and 3TDs compared with Bernard's 154 carries for 730 yards and 2TDs. Total yards are about the same, but TDs are way off. And, if Hill gets his act together there will be fewer carries for Bernard. For me, the team just doesn't use Bernard very well for extended stretches. RE: Free Agency Prediction Game - Shake n Blake - 03-01-2016 (03-01-2016, 01:22 AM)BengalChris Wrote: 3-4M is about right. Decided to look up some numbers. I think Bernard is a key element to this team and he's another weapon for us that won't cost much, so I really hope we lock him up. That said, it does seem like Bernard disappears from the game plan at times. RE: Free Agency Prediction Game - Bengal Dude - 03-01-2016 (03-01-2016, 04:36 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: I think Bernard is a key element to this team and he's another weapon for us that won't cost much, so I really hope we lock him up. Bernard is basically what Chris Perry was supposed to be. RE: Free Agency Prediction Game - Shake n Blake - 03-01-2016 (03-01-2016, 05:16 PM)Bengal Dude Wrote: Bernard is basically what Chris Perry was supposed to be. No doubt. Perry had 51 catches in 2005 and he really added an exciting element, mostly for the passing game. Too bad he was made of glass. |