Red zone offense - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Red zone offense (/thread-7861.html) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Red zone offense - Hammerstripes - 09-23-2016 Has the fade worked in Cincinnati since Carl Pickens was in town? RE: Red zone offense - Nicomo Cosca - 09-23-2016 (09-23-2016, 10:45 AM)Hammerstripes Wrote: Has the fade worked in Cincinnati since Carl Pickens was in town? I posted several links of AJ catching fades for TD's. Im sure I could find some of Eifert as well. RE: Red zone offense - yellowxdiscipline - 09-23-2016 Calling it. Eifert dresses Sunday, and gets a red zone TD. RE: Red zone offense - Hammerstripes - 09-23-2016 (09-23-2016, 10:47 AM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: I posted several links of AJ catching fades for TD's. 25% success rate isn't very good. More often than not, this gets thrown well out of bounds. RE: Red zone offense - 3wt - 09-23-2016 (09-21-2016, 10:16 PM)Derrick Wrote: Fisher was also used with devastating effectiveness as a lead blocker from the FB position. RE: Red zone offense - 3wt - 09-23-2016 (09-23-2016, 10:43 AM)yellowxdiscipline Wrote: No Eifert and Uzomah cant seem to get open in the red zone is a problem.. Personally I like Kroft better than Uzomah. They need to use him more. He had a drop in the Steelers game but he did well when he was in. I think he's more polished than Uzomah. I mean I know it's hard not to use a 6'7" 270 lb. guy who runs a 4.6 forty but measurable are only part of the story. RE: Red zone offense - Nicomo Cosca - 09-23-2016 (09-23-2016, 01:57 PM)Hammerstripes Wrote: 25% success rate isn't very good. Which makes it a low risk, high reward type play (as far as not turning it over that is). It's worth a try once in a while when we have guys as big as AJ and Eifert. That's all I'm saying. |