![]() |
Would anyone be upset with WR in the 1st? - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: Draft Central (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-9.html) +--- Thread: Would anyone be upset with WR in the 1st? (/thread-10273.html) |
RE: Would anyone be upset with WR in the 1st? - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 03-08-2017 (03-07-2017, 10:41 AM)Jpoore Wrote: im expecting williams to run a 4.48-4.52. My problem with thomas was most of his production was from the inside. As an end he had barely any production. I get his athleticsm but my point was i named who i think will be second rounders. Do we think thomas at 9 will be so much more better than those plauers i named at 41? Bc if the answer is no then go somewhere else. For example will malik hooker and jamaal adams be so much more better than a safety in the second round? Tight now the answer is yes. That was my point. That's a big difference from what you claimed he runs earlier. RE: Would anyone be upset with WR in the 1st? - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 03-08-2017 (03-07-2017, 03:02 AM)TKUHL Wrote: What about Engram, can we just make him our #2 WR and put Boyd in the slot. I'm not sure I would like a WR at 9, depends who came off the board already. I wouldn't hate the pick as much as I would if we take another CB. For some reason I really would like for us to get Cooper in the 2nd, no doubt in the 3rd if he's still there. I think this kid is going to be awesome. I would prefer Evan Engram in the 2nd and a defensive player or Olineman in the first. I would use Engram similarly to Jimmy Graham. RE: Would anyone be upset with WR in the 1st? - McC - 03-09-2017 I'll be happy with anybody who's a bad mofo. That's what I'm looking for--a bad mofo and it doesn't take him three years to reach his badness. We have so many needs that the actual position probably isn't the most important thing. |