+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html)
+--- Thread: Nate burleson is right... (/thread-21358.html)
RE: Nate burleson is right... - Destro - 09-28-2019
(09-27-2019, 05:20 PM)RunKijanaRun Wrote: Kay Adams is a snack.
That's my contribution to this thread.
Yes, she is.
RE: Nate burleson is right... - Socal Bengals fan - 09-29-2019
Nate is wrong , ain’t fooling anyone.
RE: Nate burleson is right... - leonardfan40 - 09-29-2019
Bills D even shut down Tom Brady and the pats offense. Only got 1 FG and 1 TD from the offense. Bengals did more than that last week. That one doesn’t look so bad. Browns beat Ravens so a win tomorrow and bengals are a game out of first place with a week schedule ahead.
There are still reasons to believe. Unfortunately our defense and o line look terrible. And it’s the bengals, that’s another reason not to believe
RE: Nate burleson is right... - Truck_1_0_1_ - 09-29-2019
(09-29-2019, 08:37 PM)leonardfan40 Wrote: Bills D even shut down Tom Brady and the pats offense. Only got 1 FG and 1 TD from the offense. Bengals did more than that last week. That one doesn’t look so bad. Browns beat Ravens so a win tomorrow and bengals are a game out of first place with a week schedule ahead.
There are still reasons to believe. Unfortunately our defense and o line look terrible. And it’s the bengals, that’s another reason not to believe
Defense looked terrible in a hangover game; they've had 2 games with good tackling, turnovers and sacks, while not giving up the world in yards, while they've only had 1 awful game.
Our D is NOT terrible.
RE: Nate burleson is right... - CardCounterChris - 09-30-2019
(09-26-2019, 10:07 PM)Tlawsonmariat82 Wrote: He said his reasoning comes from the schedule the Bengals have played so far noting the 8-1 combined record of the Bengals first 3 opponents...
I don't like using the 8-1 record stat...it doesn't really mean anything. If Cincy won its first 3 games, we'd just be saying, well Cincy is 3-0 but their opponent's combined record through three weeks is only 5-4. Our games play a huge impact on that. However, I'll take solace in a win over the Steelers.
RE: Nate burleson is right... - SHRacerX - 09-30-2019
(09-27-2019, 02:50 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: I found it.
OMG, that is hilarious. "Skype in to my custody hearings? and "there are only three kinds of ties: Mai Tai's in Turks, Pad Thai, and paying someone to tie me up once in a while"....That's some funny shit.
RE: Nate burleson is right... - SHRacerX - 09-30-2019
(09-29-2019, 08:45 PM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: Defense looked terrible in a hangover game; they've had 2 games with good tackling, turnovers and sacks, while not giving up the world in yards, while they've only had 1 awful game.
Our D is NOT terrible.
The game where the offense sustained drives, the D held their own. There has to be balance.
I wish SF was a divisional foe and we got to play them again. I would love to see how the coaches went after them a second game.