![]() |
QB or the WR which is it ? - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: QB or the WR which is it ? (/thread-24047.html) |
RE: QB or the WR which is it ? - bengalfan74 - 05-27-2020 (05-27-2020, 08:30 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: I think one of Dalton's biggest weaknesses (mobility and downfield vision while manipulating the pocket) is one of Burrow's biggest strengths. Now, will Joe be able to feel as confident behind this offensive line? I actually believe he will. He made the LSU line look a lot better than it was, and I think the way he maneuvers around in the pocket will have a big effect on the receiving stats of the WRs, TEs, and RBs. Agree, but 2015 also for the first 9 games or so Dalton was manipulating the pocket fairly well and even throwing on the run a bit. But after the injury he never really got it back for 16 or 17. Burrow hasn't played an NFL snap yet so it's just speculation at this point. But I strongly feel a large part of out lack of production from our receivers/backs can be laid at the feet of our QB's. I can't wait to see it either ! ![]() RE: QB or the WR which is it ? - Shake n Blake - 05-27-2020 (05-21-2020, 01:34 PM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: I mean, you're accounting for poor QB play in regards to other positions, but it seems you're not doing the same in regards to QB play. Great post. As Fred said, the true answer is that it goes both ways. A bad QB can drag you down, but a bad team can drag down a QB as well. Or maybe you could say a bad team is just a bad team? ![]() I think most have agreed that Dalton is somewhere around average as a starter through his career. He's not a top 5 elite guy that's required to drag a bad roster to 10 wins (although even guys like Pig Ben and Brees haven't done that, either). He's also not the reason we went 21-42-1 over the last 4 seasons. The Bengals allowed the roster to rot around Dalton for 4 years. We had draft busts on the o-line. As you pointed out, Green has missed a ton of time. We did little to nothing in free agency. Our once elite defense fell off a cliff. The run game has been spotty to put it very kindly. Our highlight addition last year was a tackle who missed the season. What QB (let alone an average one) wins in that situation?? So I suppose if we start winning again in 2020, people will point to the QB. Depending on the season Burrow has, that could be partially correct...but it would be ignoring the off-season we just had. We just spent more money on free agents than we ever did under Dalton. If AJ Green is healthy, the run game improves and the defense makes a jump forward, do we attribute those wins 100% to the QB? I think some people will, but if we want to try and be fair and reasonable about this, our improvement will likely be due to all of the above. Improved QB play, healthy (and improved) receivers, a huge make-over on defense via free agency, and hopefully improved o-line play. If Dalton were the QB in 2020, I'm positive he'd win way more than 2 games. Burrow - if as advertised - should take us another step beyond that. RE: QB or the WR which is it ? - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 05-28-2020 (05-27-2020, 08:30 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: I think one of Dalton's biggest weaknesses (mobility and downfield vision while manipulating the pocket) is one of Burrow's biggest strengths. Now, will Joe be able to feel as confident behind this offensive line? I actually believe he will. He made the LSU line look a lot better than it was, and I think the way he maneuvers around in the pocket will have a big effect on the receiving stats of the WRs, TEs, and RBs. Well said. Said it before I could about the comparison of Jefferson to Boyd. Plus Boyd is a big 6'2" practically 6'3" and a crisp route runner with great hands. Boyd has had some very good seasons with Dalton throwing to him, I cannot imagine how good of a season he can have with Burrow. Boyd is the one Receiver we seem to be able to count on health wise and he is clutch. Mixon should also have a monster season catching the ball. Burrow loves throwing to the RB as well as the Slot. RE: QB or the WR which is it ? - SHRacerX - 05-29-2020 (05-28-2020, 12:00 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Well said. Throwing to our RBs is the single greatest improvement that I think will happen this year on offense. Stupid to take Mixon off the field on 3rd down and just keep Gio in to pass protect. Even if Gio was adept at pass protection and Mixon was not, they are better served attacking the defense by spreading them out with more targets. Burrow is so quick and decisive. This will be a huge improvement. Sure hope they actually stick with that idea. RE: QB or the WR which is it ? - jfkbengals - 05-29-2020 (05-29-2020, 11:02 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: Throwing to our RBs is the single greatest improvement that I think will happen this year on offense. Stupid to take Mixon off the field on 3rd down and just keep Gio in to pass protect. Even if Gio was adept at pass protection and Mixon was not, they are better served attacking the defense by spreading them out with more targets. Burrow is so quick and decisive. This will be a huge improvement. Sure hope they actually stick with that idea. On third down last season, Gio averaged 9.2 yards per catch on 11 catches. Mixon had 3 catches at a 1 yard average. So maybe there is more to it than just pass protection. RE: QB or the WR which is it ? - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 05-29-2020 (05-29-2020, 11:02 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: Throwing to our RBs is the single greatest improvement that I think will happen this year on offense. Stupid to take Mixon off the field on 3rd down and just keep Gio in to pass protect. Even if Gio was adept at pass protection and Mixon was not, they are better served attacking the defense by spreading them out with more targets. Burrow is so quick and decisive. This will be a huge improvement. Sure hope they actually stick with that idea. Agreed, plus it wouldn't be a bad idea to use Gio on early downs at times to change things up. Too damn predictable bringing in Gio on 3rd downs all the time. (05-29-2020, 12:49 PM)jfkbengals Wrote: On third down last season, Gio averaged 9.2 yards per catch on 11 catches. Mixon had 3 catches at a 1 yard average. So maybe there is more to it than just pass protection. This is because of the predictability and the fact that they were used that little speaks volumes. RE: QB or the WR which is it ? - ochocincos - 05-29-2020 The answer is both, as both are needed to make a successful catch. But a QB is probably more important because the ball starts in the hands of the QB. RE: QB or the WR which is it ? - fredtoast - 05-29-2020 (05-29-2020, 12:49 PM)jfkbengals Wrote: On third down last season, Gio averaged 9.2 yards per catch on 11 catches. (05-29-2020, 01:30 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: This is because of the predictability So I am confused. You are saying predictability is a good thing? RE: QB or the WR which is it ? - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 05-29-2020 (05-29-2020, 02:07 PM)fredtoast Wrote: So I am confused. You are saying predictability is a good thing? No I am saying it was predictable the way we used our Backs. If we used Mixon more on 3rd downs and Gio more on early downs it would be less predictable. Use both more in the passing game and the QB has so many more options which makes us less predictable. It is very predictable when we ALWAYS use Gio on 3rd downs. |