Three winners and three losers - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Three winners and three losers (/thread-25566.html) |
RE: Three winners and three losers - Nicomo Cosca - 11-02-2020 (11-02-2020, 11:21 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: ADG is just a raw rookie. He has shown he can cover at times and be fast and make plays on ST's then he gets burnt cause he Pratt really hasn’t been any better. The only LBer even showing flashes of being something has been Logan Wilson. Hell, between a couple INT’s, a sack, and a few TFL he’s probably already done as much as any LBer we’ve had since Burfict. Must be something about #55... RE: Three winners and three losers - SHRacerX - 11-03-2020 (11-02-2020, 10:08 PM)ElkValleyBengal Wrote: According to the commercial, you should have called your doctor about 20 hours ago. Haha, I remember the SNL skit that said: "If you have an erection lasting more than four hours, call a friend and brag about it". RE: Three winners and three losers - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 11-03-2020 (11-02-2020, 11:26 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: Pratt really hasn’t been any better. The only LBer even showing flashes of being something has been Logan Wilson. Hell, between a couple INT’s, a sack, and a few TFL he’s probably already done as much as any LBer we’ve had since Burfict. Must be something about #55... Disagree on Pratt, he is usually in position, unlike Bynes who nearly always seems to be out of position. Pratt also tackles better, but agree on Wilson, dude looks to be a stud. Hope he lasts longer than Burfict. RE: Three winners and three losers - Nicomo Cosca - 11-03-2020 (11-03-2020, 08:27 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Disagree on Pratt, he is usually in position, unlike Bynes who nearly always seems to be out of position. Disagree with your disagreement. Pratt has been really bad. His PFF grade (40.8) certainly backs up what I’ve been seeing. RE: Three winners and three losers - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 11-03-2020 (11-03-2020, 11:33 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: Disagree with your disagreement. Its all good, I think a lot of Pratt having that rating has something to do with Bynes though brother. Hard to tell who has what to do at times but when Bynes doesn't roll to where the OL is showing run while Pratt does and Bynes isn't making tackles while Pratt does is another reason I question PFF. For the most part they are right till they don't know the player's job told to them by the coaches. In the end I judge missed angles and tackles and Bynes clearly has had more of these than Pratt from what I have seen. |