(01-01-2021, 10:54 PM)Big Boss Wrote: So Smith vs Chase at #5 if Sewell is gone.

(01-01-2021, 11:02 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Fields is playing great so far, so he is looking again like #2 which is great for us.

(01-01-2021, 11:08 PM)tBengal Wrote: I’m also hoping the Jets fall in love with Zach Wilson from BYU. Also, we could be sitting there at 5 and get a call from a team wanting to trade up if Fields or Wilson are still on the board.

(01-01-2021, 10:53 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: I will to try and not get snarky, I respect you too much for that. I never said I would not ask those who opted out the question, Chase, Sewell and many others opted out. As I watched Smith today, the decision may have cost Chase some money and draft position as Smith played and played like a stud, while no one has seen Chase play for a year.

I own a business that has not shut down, but I will not put anyone's job  in jeopardy for not wanting to take the risk due to the virus. Most need to work so even though they may have some fear, they need to support their family. My employees are all stars to me, but not NFL of high level college players. But, in the end, I am not sure it matters if you are rich or poor, everyone has to make decisions that are best for them.

(01-02-2021, 01:30 AM)Socal Bengals fan Wrote: With Fields playing amazing tonight,  there might be 3 quarterbacks in the top 5 in the draft   .   We need to lose and stay in the top 5 in order to get Sewell, Chase, Parsons, Pitts,  Surtain.    We need some generational type talent in this draft.

(01-01-2021, 11:02 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Fields is playing great so far, so he is looking again like #2 which is great for us.

(01-04-2021, 01:14 PM)Hammerstripes Wrote: There's no way I take a WR at #5.  Makes very little sense.

(01-04-2021, 02:52 PM)Beaker Wrote: This is a very deep WR class. We can definitely get a good one later on. We do not take one with a top 5 pick, that would be stupid. We have two good WRs in Boyd and Higgins. With the glaring holes on the O and D lines, we do not need a third WR more than a lineman. At 5, you trade back with some QB hungry team, get an extra pick, and take OT Darrisaw from Va Tech. Started every game since freshman year, got better each year, is massive, has a huge reach and is athletic in both the run and pass blocking depts. If we pick up an OL during FA, then take Pitts.

(01-05-2021, 12:05 PM)shanebo Wrote: Agree.  We have adequate depth at WR, but we desperately need OL and DL help.  We also have no TE, could use a stud LB, and need some CB help if WJIII walks.  My current preference would be Sewell, then Parsons, then Surtain/Farley, then Pitts.  I'd like to see another OT test well and shoot up the board (Slater? Darrisaw? Vera-Tucker?) as well as a couple of DL/pass rushers (Paye? Rosseau?) to give us and other teams some more options.  We just have too many other needs to spend a first on a WR.

BTW, did you know that out of all the 14 playoff teams this year, only 2 have a first-round WR as their leading receiver?  TB (Evans) and Bal (Brown).  Anecdotal, sure, but still interesting. 

(01-05-2021, 12:05 PM)shanebo Wrote: Agree.  We have adequate depth at WR, but we desperately need OL and DL help.  We also have no TE, could use a stud LB, and need some CB help if WJIII walks.  My current preference would be Sewell, then Parsons, then Surtain/Farley, then Pitts.  I'd like to see another OT test well and shoot up the board (Slater? Darrisaw? Vera-Tucker?) as well as a couple of DL/pass rushers (Paye? Rosseau?) to give us and other teams some more options.  We just have too many other needs to spend a first on a WR.

BTW, did you know that out of all the 14 playoff teams this year, only 2 have a first-round WR as their leading receiver?  TB (Evans) and Bal (Brown).  Anecdotal, sure, but still interesting. 

(01-04-2021, 02:52 PM)Beaker Wrote: This is a very deep WR class. We can definitely get a good one later on. We do not take one with a top 5 pick, that would be stupid. We have two good WRs in Boyd and Higgins. With the glaring holes on the O and D lines, we do not need a third WR more than a lineman. At 5, you trade back with some QB hungry team, get an extra pick, and take OT Darrisaw from Va Tech. Started every game since freshman year, got better each year, is massive, has a huge reach and is athletic in both the run and pass blocking depts. If we pick up an OL during FA, then take Pitts.

(01-05-2021, 01:51 PM)BenZoo2 Wrote: Can smith play tackle or guard? He will not make this offense unstoppable if the qb doesn’t have time to get him the ball


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(12-30-2020, 06:52 PM)Okeana Wrote: ah yeah ignore the fact that the combo put up the best QB/receiver record in CFB history and he dropped near 1800 yards out performing the best WR in this years draft who has immediate success in the NFL.  Sorry but no

(01-11-2021, 11:48 PM)QueenCity Wrote: Smith performance tonight........ He just may be the Ross we never had.

(01-11-2021, 11:48 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: He’s not even going to make it to 5 at this rate.