Executives on the draft from The Athletic - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Executives on the draft from The Athletic (/thread-32189.html) |
RE: Executives on the draft from The Athletic - ochocincos - 05-11-2022 (05-11-2022, 05:44 PM)Soonerpeace Wrote: What did you think of some of those play calls to beat KC twice late as well as Tenn? Those weren’t Joe changing the play. Judge Taylor with an OL this year. Taylor is old school football. He’s going to play the percentages I'm excited to see this team with a (hopefully) competent OL. I'm expecting the offense to be Top 5 this year barring some critical injuries. They finished 7th in scoring, 13th in yards last year with that sieve. If Burrow is still in the Top 15 in most times sacked after adding Karras, Cappa, and Collins, that's probably a bad look for Taylor and especially Pollack, IMO. RE: Executives on the draft from The Athletic - Soonerpeace - 05-11-2022 (05-11-2022, 06:03 PM)ochocincos Wrote: I'm excited to see this team with a (hopefully) competent OL. Truly Duke Tobin, His scouting department and even Mike Brown are all involved in acquiring players. Zac has tremendous influence on the individual. But Zac isn’t nor pretends to be an expert on evaluating all positions. He’s going to be interested in their intangibles. He’ll have a say. Mike and Duke liked Frank. If the OL sucks they will all share in the blame. RE: Executives on the draft from The Athletic - ochocincos - 05-12-2022 (05-11-2022, 09:25 PM)Soonerpeace Wrote: Truly Duke Tobin, His scouting department and even Mike Brown are all involved in acquiring players. Zac has tremendous influence on the individual. But Zac isn’t nor pretends to be an expert on evaluating all positions. He’s going to be interested in their intangibles. He’ll have a say. Mike and Duke liked Frank. If the OL sucks they will all share in the blame. They might all share the blame, but it's the coaches' responsibility to get the players performing well on the field. RE: Executives on the draft from The Athletic - 3wt - 05-12-2022 (05-12-2022, 10:10 AM)ochocincos Wrote: They might all share the blame, but it's the coaches' responsibility to get the players performing well on the field. I'm thinking it's going to be a lot better. But they will be going up against NFL quality lines and a lot of playoff teams with good defenses. I don't think we need to expect a miraculous transformation, but I think it's going to be substantial. I'm very excited to see the changes. RE: Executives on the draft from The Athletic - Soonerpeace - 05-12-2022 (05-12-2022, 10:10 AM)ochocincos Wrote: They might all share the blame, but it's the coaches' responsibility to get the players performing well on the field. I think that the revamping of the OL means Taylor and Pollack are on the clock. We were awful getting yardage when teams knew we were running it. We need to be better on third down and in the red zone. There’s just no way around it. But when teams can’t be successful in the run game it sure allows the defense to play a tight man. Our run game will be much improved and stopping us on third and short won’t be easy. I expect Hurst to help a lot in third and short. Good luck on third and short when we go to 01 personnel and Hurst and Mixon go wide. That’s of course after showing we can convert with the run on third and 3. The poor OL play has made us so predictable RE: Executives on the draft from The Athletic - Sled21 - 05-12-2022 (05-11-2022, 10:24 AM)fredtoast Wrote: His last 2 games against the Bengals he has 187 rushing yards on 23 carries. How many TD's? What's his yardage in his last two games against every other team. I believe we shut him down just fine. RE: Executives on the draft from The Athletic - SHRacerX - 05-12-2022 (05-11-2022, 05:36 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Which is strange because according to PFR he allowed only a 78.0 QB Rating in his coverage and had 4 INT and 4 FF. While accurate, they were living on borrowed time in a lot of those wins. Being down 3 scores in the 4th quarter against the Colts and coming back to win was more a reflection of terrible coaching on the Colts than great play by the Rats... |