![]() |
Battle for Seeding or Rest Battered Starters? - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Battle for Seeding or Rest Battered Starters? (/thread-34158.html) |
RE: Battle for Seeding or Rest Battered Starters? - Essex Johnson - 12-23-2022 (12-23-2022, 04:52 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: What does winning a division title mean if we have super bowl aspirations? We all know this team can get to the super bowl. Why does it really matter? History is not on your side with going into playoffs as a Wlid Card.. only 10 teams since 1970 have made it to Super Bowl and there have been some good QBs not make it to Super Bowl on wild card teams... it is a much harder road winning 3 straight games especially all on the road... plus ive read enough about lost chemistry with sitting too many players... starters all the way till last game and if division is on the line, we know history says win the division not rest the starters. RE: Battle for Seeding or Rest Battered Starters? - Rubekahn29 - 12-23-2022 No chance we rest anyone. If we win the next 2, the 1 seed is a dropped KC game away from our grasp and I guarantee we will play the same time KC does. Also, if the Ravens don’t drop the next 2, AFC North is on the line. If we lose one of the next 2 then AFC NORTH will be on the line. RE: Battle for Seeding or Rest Battered Starters? - Rubekahn29 - 12-23-2022 (12-23-2022, 04:52 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: What does winning a division title mean if we have super bowl aspirations? We all know this team can get to the super bowl. Why does it really matter? But would you rather have the Bills come to us in the Divsional Round or go to the Bills in the Divisonal Round (because that is what is likely going to happen if we don’t get the 2 seed). RE: Battle for Seeding or Rest Battered Starters? - JaggedJimmyJay - 12-23-2022 The division isn't won yet. The 2 seed is guaranteed (minimum) if they win out. The 1 seed is a realistic possibility if they win out. They'll go full-throttle, and they should. RE: Battle for Seeding or Rest Battered Starters? - Joelist - 12-23-2022 Quote:We cannot lock up the division title before week 18 unless we win our next two games and Baltimore loses their next 2 games Actually if we beat the Pats tomorrow and the Rats lose to Atlanta then if we win either or the last two or the Rats lose either of the last two the AFCN is ours. RE: Battle for Seeding or Rest Battered Starters? - Frank Booth - 12-23-2022 (12-23-2022, 05:14 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: History is not on your side with going into playoffs as a Wlid Card.. only 10 teams since 1970 have made it to Super Bowl and there have been some good QBs not make it to Super Bowl on wild card teams... it is a much harder road winning 3 straight games especially all on the road... plus ive read enough about lost chemistry with sitting too many players... starters all the way till last game and if division is on the line, we know history says win the division not rest the starters. History does not apply to this year. Nothing is written in stone If the Ravens win the north, this is gonna be one of those weird years where the wild card teams are all better than the 3 and 4 seed. So you would say with a straight face that the Titans and jags are better than Chargers, dolphins, Ravens/bengals? Of course not. And I truly believe the dolphins and chargers are better than the ravens. It’s a new year. RE: Battle for Seeding or Rest Battered Starters? - Frank Booth - 12-23-2022 (12-23-2022, 05:27 PM)Rubekahn29 Wrote: But would you rather have the Bills come to us in the Divsional Round or go to the Bills in the Divisonal Round (because that is what is likely going to happen if we don’t get the 2 seed). The bills scare me less than the chiefs. And the chiefs don’t scare me You’re gonna have to beat these teams one way or the other RE: Battle for Seeding or Rest Battered Starters? - JaggedJimmyJay - 12-23-2022 The 5-seed may legitimately be as good as the 3-seed this year (could even argue better). I don’t think the 5-seed is remotely better than the 2-seed. Hosting a powerhouse in the divisional round is a major edge. RE: Battle for Seeding or Rest Battered Starters? - Essex Johnson - 12-23-2022 (12-23-2022, 05:40 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: History does not apply to this year. Nothing is written in stone if nothing is written in stone how can you say a division championship does not matter? and if nothing is written in stone, how can you say a wild card team that seems better wont still lose on the road.. i will take the history of trying to win three straight away games. RE: Battle for Seeding or Rest Battered Starters? - Frank Booth - 12-23-2022 (12-23-2022, 05:44 PM)JaggedJimmyJay Wrote: The 5-seed may legitimately be as good as the 3-seed this year (could even argue better). Like I said, if the Ravens win the north, and subsequently, the 3rd seed, all of the wildcard teams will be superior to the 3 and 4 seed. It’s just a weird year No wildcard team scares me more than the chargers though. I’d hate to see cincy face them in the first round with Joey Bosa and Khalil Mack going up against Collins and Jonah RE: Battle for Seeding or Rest Battered Starters? - Synric - 12-23-2022 (12-23-2022, 05:49 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: Like I said, if the Ravens win the north, and subsequently, the 3rd seed, all of the wildcard teams will be superior to the 3 and 4 seed. It’s just a weird year I hate Mike Williams vs the Bengals corners matchup. Really Mike Williams and Keenan Allen size are just to very bad matchups for the Bengals secondary. RE: Battle for Seeding or Rest Battered Starters? - Frank Booth - 12-23-2022 (12-23-2022, 05:48 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: if nothing is written in stone how can you say a division championship does not matter? You’re saying it matters because history says so... I’m saying screw history. Bengals are clearly a top 3 team in the conference. The afc south is a joke, and the Ravens are clearly paper tigers. A weaker afc version of the Vikings RE: Battle for Seeding or Rest Battered Starters? - Frank Booth - 12-23-2022 (12-23-2022, 05:53 PM)Synric Wrote: I hate Mike Williams vs the Bengals corners matchup. Really Mike Williams and Keenan Allen size are just to very bad matchups for the Bengals secondary. That too. Plus Josh Palmer and their tight end are also very good. Of course you have to worry about Eckler out of the backfield The chiefs scare me less than the chargers strictly because of match up problems RE: Battle for Seeding or Rest Battered Starters? - QueenCity - 12-23-2022 AFC is stacked.... give me the home games. Win out get the 2 seed with a chance at the 1. Outside of maybe Tennessee now with Malik starting the rest will be tough out regardless. RE: Battle for Seeding or Rest Battered Starters? - Wyche'sWarrior - 12-23-2022 (12-23-2022, 03:28 PM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: They have not locked up the division or the #2 seed yet. The #2 seed is guaranteed a home game in the divisonal round if they win in the wild card round, since the #1 seed will play the lowest of the advancing seeds, which cannot be the #2 seed. (12-23-2022, 03:29 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: Can’t really afford to rest anyone early if the Ravens are only 1 game back headed into week 18 (12-23-2022, 03:30 PM)jason Wrote: What Herm Edwards said... All of this, and I'm typically in the camp where you rest guys as soon as you can. They'll club Hendrickson, he'll be good. CTB had a stinger, those are usually good in 3 or so day's rest. Hilton tweaked an ankle that he finished the game on. They showed extra caution with Tee and Chase. These guys wanna play to run the table. In this instance, I say go for it. Plus, I like keeping up momentum. RE: Battle for Seeding or Rest Battered Starters? - bengalfan74 - 12-23-2022 (12-23-2022, 05:55 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: That too. Plus Josh Palmer and their tight end are also very good. Of course you have to worry about Eckler out of the backfield Out of all of our possible opponents the Chargers and even the Jags our the teams I'd rather not play over the rest. Hey bear and Co. have been getting better all season. Sunshine with the Jags is looking more and more like an NFL QB every week. RE: Battle for Seeding or Rest Battered Starters? - TheFan - 12-23-2022 (12-23-2022, 05:44 PM)JaggedJimmyJay Wrote: The 5-seed may legitimately be as good as the 3-seed this year (could even argue better). I think the projections for making the superbowl from the 5 seed vs 3 seed show that its a higher % chance because of what you mentioned. Especially with how Tennessee has been playing/Tannehill likely being out. Now I'd rather not go to Jacksonville but Chargers are a scary team. RE: Battle for Seeding or Rest Battered Starters? - Frank Booth - 12-23-2022 (12-23-2022, 06:14 PM)bengalfan74 Wrote: Out of all of our possible opponents the Chargers and even the Jags our the teams I'd rather not play over the rest. Hey bear and Co. have been getting better all season. Sunshine with the Jags is looking more and more like an NFL QB every week. Jags defense and o-line don’t scare me. Plus Lawrence isn’t on Herbert’s level just yet RE: Battle for Seeding or Rest Battered Starters? - Rubekahn29 - 12-23-2022 (12-23-2022, 05:43 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: The bills scare me less than the chiefs. And the chiefs don’t scare me Sure- but if you can play them at home vs at their place every team will take it at home. RE: Battle for Seeding or Rest Battered Starters? - Frank Booth - 12-23-2022 (12-23-2022, 06:20 PM)Rubekahn29 Wrote: Sure- but if you can play them at home vs at their place every team will take it at home. I don’t want to hear about being at home or winning the division. It doesn’t matter. This team has proven it does not matter. They have IT. They have the leadership. They have Lou Anorumo. They have Joe Burrow I believe this team to be a super bowl team. If the team is banged up going into week 18, and the 1 seed is out of reach, the smartest thing to do would be to rest up. That wouldn’t happen though because the afc north would most likely be up for grabs week 18, and the bengals just aren’t gonna sit key players in that situation |